Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Agronomy

Crop response to simulated diflufenican carryover and sprayer contamination with a diflufenican premixture

Matthew C. Woolard; Jason K. Norsworthy; L. Tom Barber; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Palmer amaranth [ Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats] has evolved resistance to nine sites of action (SOAs) globally, leaving producers searching for effective herbicide options. Bayer CropScience has announced intentions to launch a series of Convintro™ brand herbicides, one of which will be a premixture including diflufenican, metribuzin, and flufenacet for preemergence use in soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Diflufenican is a WSSA group 12 herbicide that would add a new SOA for soybean producers. With the anticipated launch of the premixture, research is needed to evaluate the potential for diflufenican carryover or tank contamination from a diflufenican premixture to injure corn, cotton, grain sorghum, rice, and soybean. Carryover experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 in Fayetteville, AR, and near Stuttgart, AR. Diflufenican was applied preplant at 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 g ai ha -1 , with crops being planted after a 1.3 cm irrigation or rainfall event occurred. Injury was <10% for rice and corn, <5% for grain sorghum, and no crop response from cotton at 14 days after emergence (DAE). No detrimental effect was observed on various crops by 28 DAE. Additionally, tank contamination experiments were conducted in Arkansas in Fayetteville, near Stuttgart, near Colt, and in Keiser. A 0.17:0.35:0.48 ratio of a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture, at rates up to 103 g ai ha -1 , was applied at the 3-leaf growth stage for each crop. Injury was ≤30% for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), <20% for corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean, and <5% for grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at 7 days after treatment (DAT). By 28 DAT, injury was <15% for cotton, <10% injury for soybean and rice, and no crop response for corn or grain sorghum. Overall, the potential for diflufenican carryover or risk of injury from sprayer contamination appears low, with no yield reductions occurring in any of the evaluated crops in either set of experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carryover caused less than 10% injury in rice and corn at 14 DAE.

Treatment
Diflufenicane1
Outcome
Injurye0
Value
<10%e0
Qualifier
14 days after emergence (DAE)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was <10% for rice and corn, <5% for grain sorghum, and no crop response from cotton at 14 days after emergence (DAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diflufenican was applied preplant at 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 g ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carryover caused less than 5% grain sorghum injury at 14 DAE.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Diflufenicane1
Outcome
Injurye0
Value
<5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was <10% for rice and corn, <5% for grain sorghum, and no crop response from cotton at 14 days after emergence (DAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diflufenican was applied preplant at 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 g ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton showed no crop response to carryover at 14 DAE.

Treatment
Diflufenicane1
Outcome
crop responsee0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no crop response from cotton at 14 days after emergence (DAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diflufenican was applied preplant at 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 g ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Various crops showed no detrimental carryover effect by 28 DAE.

Taxon
various cropse0
Outcome
detrimental effecte0
Direction
Noe0
Qualifier
by 28 DAEe0

Verbatim

e0

“No detrimental effect was observed on various crops by 28 DAE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank contamination caused at most 30% cotton injury at 7 DAT.

Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
Injurye0
Value
≤30%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was ≤30% for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), <20% for corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean, and <5% for grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at 7 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1669 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank contamination caused under 20% injury in corn and soybean at 7 DAT.

Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
Injurye0
Value
<20%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was ≤30% for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), <20% for corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean, and <5% for grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at 7 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1669 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank contamination caused under 5% injury in sorghum and rice at 7 DAT.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
Injurye0
Value
<5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was ≤30% for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), <20% for corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean, and <5% for grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at 7 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1669 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 28 DAT, tank contamination caused under 15% cotton injury.

Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
injurye0
Value
<15%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 28 DAT, injury was <15% for cotton, <10% injury for soybean and rice, and no crop response for corn or grain sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 28 DAT, tank contamination caused under 10% soybean and rice injury.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
injurye0
Value
<10%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 28 DAT, injury was <15% for cotton, <10% injury for soybean and rice, and no crop response for corn or grain sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 28 DAT, corn and grain sorghum showed no tank contamination response.

Treatment
diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixturee1
Outcome
crop responsee0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no crop response for corn or grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1789 · show in text ↑
e1

“a diflufenican:metribuzin:flufenacet premixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither experiment caused yield reductions in any evaluated crop.

Taxon
evaluated cropse0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
noe0

Verbatim

e0

“no yield reductions occurring in any of the evaluated crops in either set of experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1992 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · crop injury · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 5 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flufenacet · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.