Paper · 2024 · Weed Technology

Residual weed control in cotton utilizing herbicide-coated fertilizer

Brock A. Dean; Charles W. Cahoon; Guy D. Collins; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract An experiment was conducted in 2022 and 2023 near Rocky Mount and Clayton, NC, to evaluate residual herbicide-coated fertilizer for cotton tolerance and Palmer amaranth control. Treatments included acetochlor, atrazine, dimethenamid- P , diuron, flumioxazin, fluometuron, fluridone, fomesafen, linuron, metribuzin, pendimethalin, pyroxasulfone, pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone, S -metolachlor, and sulfentrazone. Each herbicide was individually coated on granular ammonium sulfate (AMS) and top-dressed at 321 kg ha −1 (67 kg N ha −1 ) onto 5- to 7-leaf cotton. The check plots received the equivalent rate of nonherbicide-treated AMS. Before top-dress, all plots (including the check) were treated with glyphosate and glufosinate to control previously emerged weeds. All herbicides except metribuzin resulted in transient cotton injury. Cotton response to metribuzin varied by year and location. In 2022, metribuzin caused 11% to 39% and 8% to 17% injury at the Clayton and Rocky Mount locations, respectively. In 2023, metribuzin caused 13% to 32% injury at Clayton and 73% to 84% injury at Rocky Mount. Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%. Pendimethalin and fluometuron were the least effective treatments, resulting in 58% and 62% control, respectively. As anticipated, early season metribuzin injury translated into yield loss; plots treated with metribuzin yielded 640 kg ha −1 and were comparable to yields after linuron (790 kg ha −1 ) was used. These findings suggest that with the exception of metribuzin, residual herbicides coated onto AMS may be suitable and effective in cotton production, providing growers with additional modes of action for late-season control of multiple herbicide–resistant Palmer amaranth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested herbicides except metribuzin caused transient cotton injury.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
cotton injurye0
Qualifier
transiente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicides except metribuzin resulted in transient cotton injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton response to metribuzin varied by year and location.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
response to metribuzine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton response to metribuzin varied by year and location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused 11% to 39% cotton injury at Clayton in 2022.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
11% to 39%e0
Qualifier
2022e0
Setting
Claytone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2022, metribuzin caused 11% to 39% and 8% to 17% injury at the Clayton and Rocky Mount locations, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused 8% to 17% cotton injury at Rocky Mount in 2022.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
8% to 17%e0
Qualifier
2022e0
Setting
Rocky Mounte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2022, metribuzin caused 11% to 39% and 8% to 17% injury at the Clayton and Rocky Mount locations, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused 13% to 32% cotton injury at Clayton in 2023.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
13% to 32%e0
Qualifier
2023e0
Setting
Claytone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2023, metribuzin caused 13% to 32% injury at Clayton and 73% to 84% injury at Rocky Mount.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused 73% to 84% cotton injury at Rocky Mount in 2023.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
injurye0
Value
73% to 84%e0
Qualifier
2023e0
Setting
Rocky Mounte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2023, metribuzin caused 13% to 32% injury at Clayton and 73% to 84% injury at Rocky Mount.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone controlled Palmer amaranth by 91%.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfonee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
91%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone plus carfentrazone controlled Palmer amaranth by 89%.

Treatment
pyroxasulfone + carfentrazonee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen controlled Palmer amaranth by 87%.

Treatment
fomesafene0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone controlled Palmer amaranth by 86%.

Treatment
fluridonee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin controlled Palmer amaranth by 86%.

Treatment
flumioxazine0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine controlled Palmer amaranth by 85%.

Treatment
atrazinee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controlled Palmer amaranthe0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone (91%), pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone (89%), fomesafen (87%), fluridone (86%), flumioxazin (86%), and atrazine (85%) controlled Palmer amaranth ≥85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin controlled Palmer amaranth by 58%, among the least effective treatments.

Treatment
Pendimethaline0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
58%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin and fluometuron were the least effective treatments, resulting in 58% and 62% control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“Palmer amaranth ≥85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluometuron controlled Palmer amaranth by 62%, among the least effective treatments.

Treatment
fluometurone0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin and fluometuron were the least effective treatments, resulting in 58% and 62% control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“Palmer amaranth ≥85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin injury translated into cotton yield loss, with treated plots yielding 640 kg ha −1.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
640 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early season metribuzin injury translated into yield loss; plots treated with metribuzin yielded 640 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron-treated cotton yielded 790 kg ha −1, comparable to metribuzin-treated plots.

Treatment
linurone0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
790 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
metribuzine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were comparable to yields after linuron (790 kg ha −1 ) was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1586 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots treated with metribuzin yielded 640 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest herbicides other than metribuzin coated on AMS may suit cotton production and control resistant Palmer amaranth.

Treatment
residual herbicides coated onto AMSe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
suitable and effective in cotton productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the exception of metribuzin, residual herbicides coated onto AMS may be suitable and effective in cotton production, providing growers with additional modes of action for late-season control of multiple herbicide–resistant Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1859 · show in text ↑

flumioxazin · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fomesafen · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pendimethalin · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fluometuron · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

carfentrazone · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pyroxasulfone · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Fluridone · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.