Paper · 2025 · FLORA AND FAUNA

Comparative evaluation of insecticides against fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra duringKharif season

Bikash Subba; Sanju Tamang; Dharmendra Kumar Janghel

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted at the Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya research farm in Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India, to evaluate the effectiveness of pesticides against jassid and fruit borer.Except for Neem, the remaining five of the insecticides displayed remarkable efficacy in suppressing fruit borer infestation and reducing damage. An organic insecticide, Agniastra @ 30 ml/L, proved highly effective in significantly suppressing fruit borer populations, resulting in a marketable okra yield of 11.84 t/ha. The use of chemical insecticides imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha) and acephate (600 g a.i./ha) successfully reduced fruit damage and increased yields to 11.72 t/ha. Neem @ 3 g a.i./ha was the least effective, while Spinosad @ 90 g a.i./ha and Emamectin Benzoate @ 30 g a.i./ha demonstrated moderate effectiveness. Agniastra @ 30 ml/L is a promising option for controlling fruit borer damage due to its health benefits and its potential to produce chemical-free export-quality produce. Moreover, Agniastra @ 30 ml/L offers a practical and sustainable solution for safer, chemical-free export-oriented okra production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five insecticides other than Neem suppressed fruit borer infestation and damage.

Treatment
remaining five of the insecticidese0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit borer infestation and reducing damagee0
Direction
suppressinge0
Comparator
Neeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for Neem, the remaining five of the insecticides displayed remarkable efficacy in suppressing fruit borer infestation and reducing damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agniastra significantly suppressed fruit borer populations.

Treatment
Agniastra @ 30 ml/Le0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit borer populationse0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agniastra @ 30 ml/L, proved highly effective in significantly suppressing fruit borer populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agniastra yielded 11.84 t/ha marketable okra.

Treatment
Agniastra @ 30 ml/Le0
Outcome
marketable okra yielde0
Value
11.84 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agniastra @ 30 ml/L, proved highly effective in significantly suppressing fruit borer populations, resulting in a marketable okra yield of 11.84 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced fruit damage.

Treatment
imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha)e0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha) and acephate (600 g a.i./ha) successfully reduced fruit damage and increased yields to 11.72 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate reduced fruit damage.

Treatment
acephate (600 g a.i./ha)e0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha) and acephate (600 g a.i./ha) successfully reduced fruit damage and increased yields to 11.72 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid increased okra yield to 11.72 t/ha.

Treatment
imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.72 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha) and acephate (600 g a.i./ha) successfully reduced fruit damage and increased yields to 11.72 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate increased okra yield to 11.72 t/ha.

Treatment
acephate (600 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.72 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid (30 g a.i./ha) and acephate (600 g a.i./ha) successfully reduced fruit damage and increased yields to 11.72 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem was the least effective insecticide.

Treatment
Neem @ 3 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem @ 3 g a.i./ha was the least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad showed moderate effectiveness.

Treatment
Spinosad @ 90 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
moderate effectivenesse0
Direction
moderate effectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad @ 90 g a.i./ha and Emamectin Benzoate @ 30 g a.i./ha demonstrated moderate effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin Benzoate showed moderate effectiveness.

Treatment
Emamectin Benzoate @ 30 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
moderate effectivenesse0
Direction
moderate effectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad @ 90 g a.i./ha and Emamectin Benzoate @ 30 g a.i./ha demonstrated moderate effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Agniastra for fruit borer control and safer export oriented okra production.

Treatment
Agniastra @ 30 ml/Le0
Interactor
Erias vittellat0pest
Outcome
safer, chemical-free export-oriented okra productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agniastra @ 30 ml/L offers a practical and sustainable solution for safer, chemical-free export-oriented okra production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Agniastra @ 30 ml/L is a promising option for controlling fruit borer damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“fruit borer, Erias vittella on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–82 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

acephate · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acephate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

insecticide · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.