Abstract
The use of cow bone biochar for improving soil chemical properties and tomato quality and shelf life remains relatively unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of biochar on soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality and shelf life of tomato. The experiment, conducted over a period of 120 days, comprised five levels (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 t ha⁻¹) of cow bone biochar arranged in a completely randomised design replicated three times. Results indicated that cow bone biochar increased soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality, shelf life and the percentage weight loss of tomato fruits relative to the control. The 40 t ha −1 biochar level increased yield of tomato by 22%, 97%, 162 and 294%, respectively relative to 30 t ha −1 , 20 t ha −1 , 10 t ha −1 and the control. Also, relative to 30, 20, 10 t ha −1 biochar and control, application of biochar at 40 t ha −1 increased shelf life of tomato by 12%, 23%, 28% and 70% respectively. These findings showed that biochar increases soil productivity, leading to improved tomato yield, quality, and shelf life. Further research is needed to determine if higher biochar rates can yield even greater benefits or if improvements level off beyond 40 t ha⁻¹.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Cow bone biochar increased soil chemical properties, growth and yield of tomato relative to the control
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- cow bone biochare1
- Outcome
- soil chemical properties, growth, yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“cow bone biochar increased soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality, shelf life and the percentage weight loss of tomato fruits relative to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow bone biochar increased tomato quality and shelf life relative to the control
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- cow bone biochare1
- Outcome
- quality, shelf lifee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“cow bone biochar increased soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality, shelf life and the percentage weight loss of tomato fruits relative to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow bone biochar increased the percentage weight loss of tomato fruits relative to the control
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- cow bone biochare1
- Outcome
- percentage weight loss of tomato fruitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“cow bone biochar increased soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality, shelf life and the percentage weight loss of tomato fruits relative to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato yield by 22% relative to 30 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- 40 t ha −1 biochar levele2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 22%e2
- Comparator
- 30 t ha −1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The 40 t ha −1 biochar level increased yield of tomato by 22%, 97%, 162 and 294%, respectively relative to 30 t ha −1 , 20 t ha −1 , 10 t ha −1 and the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato yield by 97% relative to 20 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- 40 t ha −1 biochar levele2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 97%e2
- Comparator
- 20 t ha −1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The 40 t ha −1 biochar level increased yield of tomato by 22%, 97%, 162 and 294%, respectively relative to 30 t ha −1 , 20 t ha −1 , 10 t ha −1 and the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato yield by 162% relative to 10 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- 40 t ha −1 biochar levele2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 162e2
- Comparator
- 10 t ha −1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The 40 t ha −1 biochar level increased yield of tomato by 22%, 97%, 162 and 294%, respectively relative to 30 t ha −1 , 20 t ha −1 , 10 t ha −1 and the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato yield by 294% relative to the control
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- 40 t ha −1 biochar levele2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 294%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The 40 t ha −1 biochar level increased yield of tomato by 22%, 97%, 162 and 294%, respectively relative to 30 t ha −1 , 20 t ha −1 , 10 t ha −1 and the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato shelf life by 12% relative to 30 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume3 - Treatment
- application of biochar at 40 t ha −1e3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 12%e3
- Comparator
- 30e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“relative to 30, 20, 10 t ha −1 biochar and control, application of biochar at 40 t ha −1 increased shelf life of tomato by 12%, 23%, 28% and 70% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato shelf life by 23% relative to 20 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume3 - Treatment
- application of biochar at 40 t ha −1e3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 23%e3
- Comparator
- 20e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“relative to 30, 20, 10 t ha −1 biochar and control, application of biochar at 40 t ha −1 increased shelf life of tomato by 12%, 23%, 28% and 70% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato shelf life by 28% relative to 10 t/ha
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume3 - Treatment
- application of biochar at 40 t ha −1e3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 28%e3
- Comparator
- 10e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“relative to 30, 20, 10 t ha −1 biochar and control, application of biochar at 40 t ha −1 increased shelf life of tomato by 12%, 23%, 28% and 70% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40 t/ha biochar level increased tomato shelf life by 70% relative to the control
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume3 - Treatment
- application of biochar at 40 t ha −1e3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 70%e3
- Comparator
- controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“relative to 30, 20, 10 t ha −1 biochar and control, application of biochar at 40 t ha −1 increased shelf life of tomato by 12%, 23%, 28% and 70% respectively”
The same questions in other papers
biochar · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →biochar · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.