Paper · 2025 · Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research

Population Dynamic of Fall Armyworm and Stem Borers and Their Impact on Maize: An Approach towards Innovative Management Strategies

Atabong Beza Yuri Fondungallah; Nelson N.Ntonifor

14
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) is one of the major cereal crops grown for its food and feed values. It is one of the most important staple foods providing calories for consumers and income for traders, but pest complex as major constraints to its production. The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda and Lepidopteran stem borers are the most devastating pests of maize. In view of the recent arrival of the fall armyworm in 2016 in Africa, there is paucity of information on the distribution and abundance together with stem borers in Cameroon. This study was conducted to generate baseline information on the effect of fall armyworm and stem borers, distribution, population dynamics and damage on maize in Buea. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Agriculture Teaching and Research Farm, University of Buea. There were 3 treatments including control. (Control (Traps only), Trap + wood ash and Trap + detasseling) replicated thrice and arranged in a randomized complete block design. Two varieties of maize; UBMS0001 and CMS8704 were used in the study and baited traps were deployed in maize fields, hung on wooden poles at an approximate height of about 1.5 m above ground, to assess moth’s population and variations over time. Captured moth species were counted, and the attractant renewed weekly. Wood ash was applied gently on the leaves and stems of the plants manually soon as infestation was detected. Detasseling was done when the maize had tasseled because the 1st and 2nd instar larvae of the pests go up the tassel to feed on the pollen. The incidence of damaged plants abundance was monitored by visual sampling using the following indicators: exit holes on stems, frass, dead heart, lodged plants, irregular damage (cuts) on leaves in each maize variety. The findings of this study indicate that, more insects were found on the maize variety UBMS0001 compared to CMS8704, the mean number of plants damaged by fall armyworm and stem borers was higher for UBMS 0001 compared to CMS8704 but UBMS0001 had a higher yield compared to CMS8704.The results demonstrated that catches increased steadily from time of plants emergence and afterwards, catches declined significantly when the plants were growing into the reproductive stage. The larvae of three species which affects the growth and development of maize were observed in the stems of both maize varieties at harvest: the whitish purple Busseola fusca larvae, the dark to blackish Eldana saccharina and the pink Sesamia calamistis larvae, Eldana saccharina being the most abundant species. A higher number of FAW, Stem borers and damaged plants during the rainy season compared to the dry season was recorded. According to the results of this study, the performance of trap + detasseling on the yield of maize was significantly better than most of the other treatments. There was a higher number of damaged plants of 78 in the rainy season as compared to 55 in the dry season caused by FAW and 19 in the rainy season as compared to 10 in the dry season by stem borers. From the results of this study, the combined effect of trapping and detasseling (Trap + Detasseling) against fall armyworm and stem borers was significantly better than most of the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UBMS0001 had more insects than CMS8704.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Material
UBMS0001e0
Outcome
insectse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CMS8704e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more insects were found on the maize variety UBMS0001 compared to CMS8704”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1885 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UBMS0001 had more plants damaged by fall armyworm and stem borers than CMS8704.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Material
UBMS 0001e0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Second interactor
stem borerse0pest
Outcome
mean number of plants damaged by fall armyworm and stem borerse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CMS8704e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean number of plants damaged by fall armyworm and stem borers was higher for UBMS 0001 compared to CMS8704”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1998 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UBMS0001 yielded more than CMS8704.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Material
UBMS0001e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CMS8704e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UBMS0001 had a higher yield compared to CMS8704”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2050 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth catches increased steadily after maize emergence.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
plants emergencee0
Interactor
mothe2pest
Outcome
moth’s populatione2
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catches increased steadily from time of plants emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
e2

“to assess moth’s population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth catches declined significantly during maize reproductive growth.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Interactor
mothe2pest
Outcome
moth’s populatione2
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catches declined significantly when the plants were growing into the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2154–2241 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
e2

“to assess moth’s population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Busseola fusca larvae were present in stems of both maize varieties at harvest.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse2
Organ / stage
stemse1
Interactor
Busseola fuscaBusseola fuscae0pest
Outcome
were observed in the stemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Busseola fusca
Busseola fusca · InteractorLEMAUX Yves · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the whitish purple Busseola fusca larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2424 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larvae of three species which affects the growth and development of maize were observed in the stems of both maize varieties at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2382 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eldana saccharina larvae were present in stems of both maize varieties at harvest and were most abundant.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse2
Interactor
Eldana saccharinaEldana saccharinae0pest
Outcome
were observed in the stemse1
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eldana saccharina
Eldana saccharina · InteractorKen Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eldana saccharina being the most abundant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2505–2554 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larvae of three species which affects the growth and development of maize were observed in the stems of both maize varieties at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2382 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesamia calamistis larvae were present in stems of both maize varieties at harvest.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse2
Interactor
Sesamia calamistisSesamia calamistise0pest
Outcome
were observed in the stemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pink Sesamia calamistis larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2469–2503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larvae of three species which affects the growth and development of maize were observed in the stems of both maize varieties at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2382 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm abundance was higher in the rainy season than the dry season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Interactor
FAWe0pest
Outcome
number of FAWe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dry seasone0
Setting
rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher number of FAW, Stem borers and damaged plants during the rainy season compared to the dry season was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2556–2674 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem borer abundance was higher in the rainy season than the dry season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Stem borerse0pest
Outcome
Stem borerse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dry seasone0
Setting
rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher number of FAW, Stem borers and damaged plants during the rainy season compared to the dry season was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2556–2674 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall armyworm damaged 78 maize plants in the rainy season versus 55 in the dry season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Interactor
FAWe0pest
Outcome
damaged plantse0
Direction
highere0
Value
78e0
Qualifier
55 in the dry seasone0
Setting
rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher number of damaged plants of 78 in the rainy season as compared to 55 in the dry season caused by FAW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2846–2955 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem borers damaged 19 maize plants in the rainy season versus 10 in the dry season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Interactor
stem borerse0pest
Outcome
damaged plantse2
Direction
highere3
Value
19e0
Qualifier
10 in the dry seasone0
Setting
rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19 in the rainy season as compared to 10 in the dry season by stem borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2960–3033 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of damaged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2855–2879 · show in text ↑
e3

“A higher number of FAW, Stem borers and damaged plants during the rainy season compared to the dry season was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2556–2674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap plus detasseling yielded significantly better maize performance than most other treatments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
trap + detasselinge0
Outcome
yield of maizee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
most of the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance of trap + detasseling on the yield of maize was significantly better than most of the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2716–2834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap plus detasseling controlled fall armyworm and stem borers significantly better than most other treatments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Trap + Detasselinge0
Interactor
fall armywormSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Second interactor
stem borerse0pest
Outcome
against fall armyworm and stem borerse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
most of the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trapping and detasseling (Trap + Detasseling) against fall armyworm and stem borers was significantly better than most of the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3090–3232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

trap barrier · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.