Paper · 2012 · Yu, L 2012, 'Response of root fungi in Pisum sativum to plant and soil environmental factors'.

Response of root fungi in Pisum sativum to plant and soil environmental factors

Yu, Lingling

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant roots harbor a large number of fungi that play an important role both in agroecosystems and natural ecosystems. These fungi can be plant pathogenic, parasitic, saprotrophic or mutualistic. The root-associated fungi are involved in various ecological processes in root ecosystems, such as improving plant nutrient uptake, cycling organic carbon, suppressing plant diseases and enhancing plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. In turn, the community and structure of root-associated fungi maybe influenced by rhizosphere conditions such as plant health status, plant growth stage and nutritional status of the plant and soil environments. However, limited information is available about the richness and composition of most of these root-associated fungi as studies of fungal communities remain a challenge because of below-ground high taxonomic and ecological diversity. In the present study, Pisum sativum was used as a model crop to study fungal community structure associated with roots under different environmental conditions. Three individual experiments were conducted in order to study root-associated fungal community structure in relation to root-internal factors in terms of plant health status and plant growth stage and, to a root-external condition in terms of organic fertilization. For identification and semi-quantification of fungal taxa, pyrosequencing combined with DNA barcode technology was applied in this study. Two primer sets (ITS1F/ITS2 and ITS1F/ITS4) from ITS regions were used to generate amplicon reads. Beside the molecular approach, classical fungal identification by microscopy after root staining was also applied. The CLOTU program from the Bioportal package was used for sequence quality control and sequence identification in GenBank. For the statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in the measurement of plant growth parameters and relative abundance of root-associated fungi, and principle component analysis (PCA) was used to examine the response of communities of root fungi to the plant and soil environmental factors. vi The three studies showed that root-associated fungal communities were highly diverse and significantly influenced by plant and soil environmental factors, and results supported the hypotheses that the relative abundance of dominant fungal groups differed between healthy and diseased plants, altered according to plant growth stage and responded significantly to different organic fertilizer dosages. In the study of root fungi in relation to plant health status, the richness and abundance of fungal community structures showed clear differences in roots grown in the four soils employed, whereas fungal richness did not correlate with plant health status. A clear succession pattern of rootassociated fungi was formed in pea during the vegetative, flowering and senescence plant growth stages. Pathogenic and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi dominated during the vegetative growth stage, whereas saprotrophic fungi dominated during senescence, suggesting that fungal species have different strategies for obtaining organic energy from their host plant. The last study was focused on how soil organic amendments regulated fungal community, generally, the distribution of fungal groups revealed their ecological functional traits; thus obligate biotrophic fungi and saprotrophic fungi were markedly increased with organic fertilizer dosages, while root pathogenic fungi were decreased with organic amendments. In conclusion, the present work has shown that root-associated fungal community structure relate to plant and soil environmental factors. The obtained knowledge from this study can provide novel information of communities of root-associated fungi; thus improving the basic understanding of plant-root fungi-environment interactions in agroecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea root fungal communities were highly diverse.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
root-associated fungal communitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root-associated fungal communities were highly diverse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant and soil conditions significantly influenced pea root fungal communities.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
root-associated fungal communitiese0
Setting
plant and soil environmental factorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root-associated fungal communities were highly diverse and significantly influenced by plant and soil environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant fungal groups differed between healthy and diseased pea plants.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
relative abundance of dominant fungal groupse0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
healthy and diseased plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative abundance of dominant fungal groups differed between healthy and diseased plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2294–2387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant fungal groups changed with pea growth stage.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
plant growth stagee0
Outcome
root fungit0
Direction
alterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altered according to plant growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2389–2428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of root fungi in Pisum sativum to plant and soil environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant fungal groups responded significantly to organic fertilizer dosage.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
different organic fertilizer dosagese0
Outcome
root fungit0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“responded significantly to different organic fertilizer dosages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2433–2496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of root fungi in Pisum sativum to plant and soil environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root fungal richness and abundance differed across four soils.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
richness and abundance of fungal community structurese0
Direction
clear differencese0
Setting
four soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the richness and abundance of fungal community structures showed clear differences in roots grown in the four soils employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2561–2685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal richness did not correlate with pea health status.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
fungal richnesse0
Direction
did not correlatee0
Comparator
plant health statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal richness did not correlate with plant health status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2695–2753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea root fungi showed succession across vegetative, flowering and senescence stages.

Organ / stage
vegetative, flowering and senescence plant growth stagese0
Outcome
succession pattern of rootassociated fungie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A clear succession pattern of rootassociated fungi was formed in pea during the vegetative, flowering and senescence plant growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2755–2891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogenic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi dominated at the vegetative stage.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
vegetative growth stagee0
Outcome
Pathogenic and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi dominatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pathogenic and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi dominated during the vegetative growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2893–2986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotrophic fungi dominated during pea senescence.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
senescencee0
Outcome
saprotrophic fungi dominatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“saprotrophic fungi dominated during senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2996–3042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Obligate biotrophic and saprotrophic root fungi increased with organic fertilizer dosage.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
organic fertilizer dosagese0
Outcome
obligate biotrophic fungi and saprotrophic fungie0
Direction
markedly increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“obligate biotrophic fungi and saprotrophic fungi were markedly increased with organic fertilizer dosages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3334–3438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pathogenic fungi decreased with organic amendments.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Outcome
root pathogenic fungie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root pathogenic fungi were decreased with organic amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3446–3506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–39 · show in text ↑

organic · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.