Paper · 2025 · Annals of Applied Biology

Optimizing benzyladenine application for feather formation on unpruned leaders of ‘Gala Mast’ and ‘Oregon Spur’ apple nursery trees

K. L. Kumawat; W. H. Raja; O. C. Sharma; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The use of well‐feathered nursery trees considerably enhances precocity and, consequently, the profitability of apple orchards. This study aimed to develop an efficient technique for feather development in 1‐year‐old apple nursery trees of ‘Gala Mast’ and ‘Oregon Spur’ grafted on MM.106 rootstock by employing benzyladenine (BA). The concentration, spray frequency, and spray interval of BA had a statistically significant impact on tree quality, with the spray interval being the most influential factor. An increase in concentration from 500 to 600 ppm positively affected most of the studied variables. However, the values for these variables decreased with further increasing concentration from 600 to 700 ppm. In ‘Gala Mast’, the greatest positive effect on most of the tree quality determinants was observed with four sprays, and increasing the spray frequency from four to five did not further affect the number of feathers, feathers with the optimum length, and feathering zone. Conversely, an increase in spray frequency from three to five led to a positive response in ‘Oregon Spur’ nursery trees quality in terms of number of feathers, total feather length, and feathering zone. However, statistically significant differences in the number of feathers and feathering zone were not found with four and five sprays. Further, a 1‐week spray interval was found most effective for ‘Gala Mast’, whereas a 2‐week interval was optimal for ‘Oregon Spur’. In conclusion, applying four sprays of 600 ppm BA at 1‐week intervals for ‘Gala Mast’ and 2‐week intervals for ‘Oregon Spur’ resulted in the most favourable effects on the number of feathers and overall quality of the nursery trees. The findings of this study indicated that the frequency of BA sprays depends on the growing period length, while the interval between applications is determined by the cultivar's ability to resume terminal growth after temporary suppression by BA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in BA concentration from 500 to 600 ppm positively affected most studied variables of apple nursery trees

Treatment
concentration from 500 to 600 ppme1
Outcome
most of the studied variablese1
Direction
positively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“An increase in concentration from 500 to 600 ppm positively affected most of the studied variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further increasing BA concentration from 600 to 700 ppm decreased the values of the studied variables in apple nursery trees

Treatment
further increasing concentration from 600 to 700 ppme2
Outcome
values for these variablese2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, the values for these variables decreased with further increasing concentration from 600 to 700 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Gala Mast, four BA sprays gave the greatest positive effect on most tree quality determinants

Material
Gala Maste3
Treatment
four sprayse3
Outcome
tree quality determinantse3
Direction
greatest positive effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“In ‘Gala Mast’, the greatest positive effect on most of the tree quality determinants was observed with four sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Gala Mast, increasing the spray frequency from four to five did not further affect feather number, optimum-length feathers or feathering zone

Material
Gala Maste3
Treatment
spray frequency from four to fivee4
Outcome
number of feathers, feathers with the optimum length, and feathering zonee4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
four sprayse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“In ‘Gala Mast’, the greatest positive effect on most of the tree quality determinants was observed with four sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–840 · show in text ↑
e4

“increasing the spray frequency from four to five did not further affect the number of feathers, feathers with the optimum length, and feathering zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Oregon Spur, increasing spray frequency from three to five gave a positive response in feather number, total feather length and feathering zone

Material
Oregon Spure5
Treatment
spray frequency from three to fivee5
Outcome
number of feathers, total feather length, and feathering zonee5
Direction
positive responsee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e5

“an increase in spray frequency from three to five led to a positive response in ‘Oregon Spur’ nursery trees quality in terms of number of feathers, total feather length, and feathering zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four and five BA sprays did not differ significantly in feather number or feathering zone

Treatment
four and five sprayse6
Outcome
number of feathers and feathering zonee6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e6

“statistically significant differences in the number of feathers and feathering zone were not found with four and five sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1-week BA spray interval was the most effective for Gala Mast

Material
Gala Maste7
Treatment
1‐week spray intervale7
Outcome
most effectivee7
Direction
most effectivee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e7

“Further, a 1‐week spray interval was found most effective for ‘Gala Mast’, whereas a 2‐week interval was optimal for ‘Oregon Spur’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2-week BA spray interval was optimal for Oregon Spur

Material
Oregon Spure7
Treatment
2‐week intervale7
Outcome
optimale7
Direction
optimale7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e7

“Further, a 1‐week spray interval was found most effective for ‘Gala Mast’, whereas a 2‐week interval was optimal for ‘Oregon Spur’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of 600 ppm BA at 1-week intervals gave the most favourable effects on feather number and overall quality of apple nursery trees

Treatment
four sprays of 600 ppm BA at 1‐week intervalse2
Outcome
number of feathers and overall quality of the nursery treese2
Direction
most favourable effectse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“applying four sprays of 600 ppm BA at 1‐week intervals for ‘Gala Mast’ and 2‐week intervals for ‘Oregon Spur’ resulted in the most favourable effects on the number of feathers and overall quality of the nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1698 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The frequency of BA sprays depends on the growing period length (author inference)

Outcome
frequency of BA sprayse2
Qualifier
depends on the growing period lengthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“the frequency of BA sprays depends on the growing period length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1805 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The spray interval is determined by the cultivar ability to resume terminal growth after BA suppression (author inference)

Outcome
interval between applicationse2
Qualifier
cultivar's ability to resume terminal growth after temporary suppression by BAe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“the interval between applications is determined by the cultivar's ability to resume terminal growth after temporary suppression by BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1946 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentration, spray frequency and spray interval of BA had a statistically significant association with apple tree quality

Treatment
concentration, spray frequency, and spray interval of BAe2
Outcome
tree qualitye2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“The concentration, spray frequency, and spray interval of BA had a statistically significant impact on tree quality, with the spray interval being the most influential factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray interval was the most influential factor for apple tree quality under BA treatment

Treatment
spray intervale2
Outcome
tree qualitye2
Qualifier
the most influential factore2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“apple nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“The concentration, spray frequency, and spray interval of BA had a statistically significant impact on tree quality, with the spray interval being the most influential factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–514 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 11 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.