Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Exploring potentials of the physical and biochemical characteristics of Gracilaria gracilis and Gracilaria edulis for enhancing plant growth under abiotic stress

R Rizam; R Jayashree; P Dhevagi; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seaweed may assist agricultural crops to adapt with abiotic stress and are widely used in agriculture, especially as biostimulants that improve plant growth and resistance to abiotic stressors. The study focuses on the biochemical characteristics of these seaweeds and their effect as plant biostimulant to improve germination and crop growth. Seaweeds were collected from Mandapam area of Ramanathapuram district and identified as Gracilaria gracilis and Gracilaria edulis from AJC Bose Indian Botanic Garden, West Bengal and their physico-chemical properties were evaluated. Higher protein levels were obtained in G. edulis (16.72 %), swelling capacity (SWC) in G. gracilis (23.25 mL g-1) is more compared to G. edulis, however, water holding capacity (WHC) of G. edulis (11.31 g g-1) was higher. The findings demonstrate that G. edulis has superior WHC, whereas G. gracilis has higher SWC, which improves soil moisture retention and nutrient availability. Further study shows that the two species' mineral compositions differ significantly, with G. gracilis being higher in potassium (6413.5 ppm) and sodium (1051.5 ppm), which may help with osmotic management in plants. Growth parameters were significantly improved by the treatment (T2–T5). In comparison to control T1, treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %) exhibited the longest roots (51 ± 0.37 cm) and shoots (34 ± 0.35 cm), remarkable seed vigor index (26.88 ± 0.30) and a high germination percentage (96 ± 0.06 %). Overall, the results provide support to the usage of these seaweeds as organic fertilizers in difficult environmental situations to enhance crop growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. gracilis had greater swelling capacity than G. edulis, at 23.25 mL g-1.

Taxon
G. gracilisGracilaria gracilise0
Outcome
swelling capacity (SWC)e0
Direction
moree0
Value
23.25 mL g-1e0
Comparator
G. edulise0

Verbatim

e0

“swelling capacity (SWC) in G. gracilis (23.25 mL g-1) is more compared to G. edulis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–720 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. edulis had higher water holding capacity, at 11.31 g g-1.

Taxon
G. edulisGracilaria edulise0
Outcome
water holding capacity (WHC)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.31 g g-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“water holding capacity (WHC) of G. edulis (11.31 g g-1) was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. gracilis had higher potassium content, at 6413.5 ppm.

Taxon
G. gracilisGracilaria gracilise0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
6413.5 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“G. gracilis being higher in potassium (6413.5 ppm) and sodium (1051.5 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. gracilis had higher sodium content, at 1051.5 ppm.

Taxon
G. gracilisGracilaria gracilise0
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
1051.5 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“G. gracilis being higher in potassium (6413.5 ppm) and sodium (1051.5 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments T2–T5 significantly improved crop growth parameters.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
treatment (T2–T5)e0
Outcome
Growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters were significantly improved by the treatment (T2–T5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the longest roots, 51 ± 0.37 cm, compared with T1.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %)e0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
longeste0
Value
51 ± 0.37 cme0
Comparator
control T1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control T1, treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %) exhibited the longest roots (51 ± 0.37 cm) and shoots (34 ± 0.35 cm), remarkable seed vigor index (26.88 ± 0.30) and a high germination percentage (96 ± 0.06 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced shoots of 34 ± 0.35 cm compared with T1.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %)e0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
longeste0
Value
34 ± 0.35 cme0
Comparator
control T1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control T1, treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %) exhibited the longest roots (51 ± 0.37 cm) and shoots (34 ± 0.35 cm), remarkable seed vigor index (26.88 ± 0.30) and a high germination percentage (96 ± 0.06 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced a seed vigor index of 26.88 ± 0.30 compared with T1.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %)e0
Outcome
seed vigor indexe0
Direction
remarkablee0
Value
26.88 ± 0.30e0
Comparator
control T1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control T1, treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %) exhibited the longest roots (51 ± 0.37 cm) and shoots (34 ± 0.35 cm), remarkable seed vigor index (26.88 ± 0.30) and a high germination percentage (96 ± 0.06 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced germination of 96 ± 0.06% compared with T1.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %)e0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highe0
Value
96 ± 0.06 %e0
Comparator
control T1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to control T1, treatment T5 (10 % papermill effluent + G2 sps @ 7.5 %) exhibited the longest roots (51 ± 0.37 cm) and shoots (34 ± 0.35 cm), remarkable seed vigor index (26.88 ± 0.30) and a high germination percentage (96 ± 0.06 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“germination and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–342 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors supported using the seaweeds as organic fertilizers to enhance crop growth under difficult conditions.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
usage of these seaweeds as organic fertilizers in difficult environmental situations to enhance crop growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“usage of these seaweeds as organic fertilizers in difficult environmental situations to enhance crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1645 · show in text ↑