Paper · 2025 · Agriculture Development Journal

Effects of Different Tillage and Nitrogen Management Practices on Maize Yield Parameters, and Soil Properties in Mid Hills of Nepal

Pushpa Pandey; Aakriti Khatri; Akangksha Lamichhane; et al.

16
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in March 2022 at Lamjung Campus, Sundarbazar, Nepal, to study the effects of tillage and nitrogen management practices on soil properties, yield, and yield attributes of the Posilo Makai-1 variety of maize. Two tillage systems (ZT-zero tillage and CT-conventional tillage) and four nitrogen management approaches (N1-traditional farmer’s practice, N2-recommended dose of NPK fertilizer (RDF), N3-50% RDN from urea+50% from FYM (farmyard manure) + recommended dose of phosphorous and potassium, and N4-leaf color chart (LCC)-based application of nitrogen + recommended dose of phosphorus and potassium) as main-plot and sub-plot factors were replicated thrice in a split-plot design. Research results revealed that nitrogen management practices significantly affected yield attributes and yield of the maize. LCC-based nitrogen application produced the highest cob length (15.2 cm), cob diameter (40.70 cm), grains per row (29.7), ear weight (89.0 g), grains per cob (420.03), 100-grain weight (20.70 g), and grain yield (4913.89 kg/ha), while the lowest values for yield attributes and yield were reported from farmer’s practice with the lowest yield (3227.47 kg/ha). Although statistically similar, LCC-managed plots had higher residual soil nitrogen (0.15%), organic matter (2.83%), soil available phosphorus (11.97 kg/ha), and available potassium (142.44 kg/ha), with reduced soil acidity (pH 5.35). However, tillage systems showed no statistically significant effect on yield parameters, yield, and soil parameters. These findings suggest that LCC-based nitrogen management could be a better practice for sustainable soil management and resource conservation in the long run.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen practices significantly affected maize yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nitrogen management practicese0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen management practices significantly affected yield attributes and yield of the maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest cob length, 15.2 cm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
LCC-based nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
cob lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LCC-based nitrogen application produced the highest cob length (15.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest cob diameter, 40.70 cm.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
cob diametere0
Value
40.70 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cob diameter (40.70 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest grains per row, 29.7.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grains per rowe0
Value
29.7e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains per row (29.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest ear weight, 89.0 g.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
ear weighte0
Value
89.0 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ear weight (89.0 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest grains per cob, 420.03.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grains per cobe0
Value
420.03e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains per cob (420.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest 100-grain weight, 20.70 g.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
100-grain weighte0
Value
20.70 ge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100-grain weight (20.70 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC nitrogen gave the highest grain yield, 4913.89 kg/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
4913.89 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4913.89 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer practice gave the lowest grain yield, 3227.47 kg/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
farmer’s practicee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3227.47 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmer’s practice with the lowest yield (3227.47 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC plots had higher residual soil nitrogen, 0.15%.

Outcome
residual soil nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.15%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“LCC-managed plots had higher residual soil nitrogen (0.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC plots had higher soil organic matter, 2.83%.

Outcome
organic mattere0
Value
2.83%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“organic matter (2.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC plots had higher available phosphorus, 11.97 kg/ha.

Outcome
soil available phosphoruse0
Value
11.97 kg/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil available phosphorus (11.97 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC plots had higher available potassium, 142.44 kg/ha.

Outcome
available potassiume0
Value
142.44 kg/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“available potassium (142.44 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC plots had reduced soil acidity, pH 5.35.

Outcome
soil aciditye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
pH 5.35e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil acidity (pH 5.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no statistically significant effect on yield or soil parameters.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
yield parameters, yield, and soil parameterse0
Direction
no statistically significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage systems showed no statistically significant effect on yield parameters, yield, and soil parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest LCC nitrogen management for long-term soil management and resource conservation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
LCC-based nitrogen management could be a better practice for sustainable soil management and resource conservation in the long rune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LCC-based nitrogen management could be a better practice for sustainable soil management and resource conservation in the long run”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.