Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

The endophyte Klebsiella pasteurii BDA134-6 isolated from African rice colonizes durum wheat plants helping them cope with water shortage stress

Maria Laura Amenta; Stefano Varriale; Salvatore Arbucci; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) represents a sustainable strategy to improve the adaptability of plants to water shortage stress. The present study demonstrated that the endophyte Klebsiella pasteurii BDA134-6, isolated from O. glaberrima rice grown in Mali (West Africa), efficiently colonized the durum wheat variety Primadur. Results obtained from laboratory growth chamber, greenhouse phenotyping platform, and tunnel-type greenhouse demonstrated that inoculated Primadur plants improved their response to water shortage stress. When water shortage stress was simulated by treatment with polyethylene glycol, neither a significant decrease in the relative water content of leaves nor a strong inhibition of acetylene reduction was observed for inoculated plants compared to the uninoculated ones. Inoculated plants subjected to water shortage stress showed increased activity of the antioxidant enzymes glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase (up to 38% and 191%, respectively), a proline content 3-fold higher, a reduced hydrogen peroxide accumulation (up to 50%), and no significant alterations in lipids peroxidation and leaf senescence. These findings highlight that BDA134-6 is a promising strain. Field trial experiments will allow to evaluate whether it can be used to improve antioxidant defense systems in a plant species different from the native host plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Klebsiella pasteurii BDA134-6 colonized Primadur wheat.

Material
Primadure0
Interactor
Klebsiella pasteurii BDA134-6Klebsiella pasteuriie0symbiont
Outcome
colonizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Klebsiella pasteurii BDA134-6, isolated from O. glaberrima rice grown in Mali (West Africa), efficiently colonized the durum wheat variety Primadur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Primadur had improved response to water shortage.

Material
Primadure0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
response to water shortage stresse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated Primadur plants improved their response to water shortage stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation prevented significant loss of leaf relative water content under simulated stress.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
relative water content of leavese0
Direction
neither a significant decreasee0
Comparator
uninoculated onese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“neither a significant decrease in the relative water content of leaves nor a strong inhibition of acetylene reduction was observed for inoculated plants compared to the uninoculated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation prevented strong inhibition of acetylene reduction under simulated stress.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
acetylene reductione0
Direction
nor a strong inhibitione0
Comparator
uninoculated onese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“nor a strong inhibition of acetylene reduction was observed for inoculated plants compared to the uninoculated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants increased glutathione reductase activity up to 38%.

Outcome
glutathione reductasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased activity of the antioxidant enzymes glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase (up to 38% and 191%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants increased superoxide dismutase activity up to 191%.

Outcome
superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
191%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased activity of the antioxidant enzymes glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase (up to 38% and 191%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants had threefold higher proline content.

Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
3-folde0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a proline content 3-fold higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants reduced hydrogen peroxide accumulation up to 50%.

Outcome
hydrogen peroxide accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a reduced hydrogen peroxide accumulation (up to 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants showed no significant lipid peroxidation alteration.

Outcome
lipids peroxidatione0
Direction
no significant alterationse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no significant alterations in lipids peroxidation and leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated stressed plants showed no significant leaf senescence alteration.

Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
no significant alterationse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no significant alterations in lipids peroxidation and leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1157 · show in text ↑