Paper · 2013 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Enhanced Activity of Trichogramma chilonis and Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi on Eggs of Earias vittella and Helicoverpa armigera through Kairomonic Activity of Acetone Extracts of Okra

Murali Baskaran R.K

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Three entries of okra, No. 55, Arka Anamika and AE 9, identified as highly susceptible, susceptible and resistant, respectively to Earias vittella and Helicoverpa armigera during earlier field screening were selected and the kairomone effect of acetone extracts of their plant parts (flowers, tender and mature fruits, tender and mature leaves) to enhance the activity of Trichogramma chilonis and ` was studied under laboratory condition. Acetone extract of flowers of No. 55 (1% or 10,000 ppm) enhanced the parasitism/predation by T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi on eggs of E. vittella, recording 55.33 and 58.33%, respectively while it was 6.67 and 10.67% in control (acetone). Similarly, the flower extract of No. 55 enhanced the activity of T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi by 65.33 and 68.67% on eggs of H. armigera, as compared to 10.67 and 12.55% in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No. 55 okra flower extract increased T. chilonis parasitism of E. vittella eggs to 55.33% versus 6.67% control.

Material
No. 55e0
Treatment
Acetone extract of flowers of No. 55 (1% or 10,000 ppm)e0
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism/predatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
55.33e0
Qualifier
6.67e0
Comparator
control (acetone)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetone extract of flowers of No. 55 (1% or 10,000 ppm) enhanced the parasitism/predation by T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi on eggs of E. vittella, recording 55.33 and 58.33%, respectively while it was 6.67 and 10.67% in control (acetone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No. 55 flower extract increased C. zastrowi silemi predation on E. vittella eggs to 58.33% versus 10.67% control.

Material
No. 55e0
Treatment
Acetone extract of flowers of No. 55 (1% or 10,000 ppm)e0
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Second interactor
C. zastrowi silemiChrysoperla zastrowie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism/predatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
58.33%e0
Qualifier
10.67%e0
Comparator
control (acetone)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetone extract of flowers of No. 55 (1% or 10,000 ppm) enhanced the parasitism/predation by T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi on eggs of E. vittella, recording 55.33 and 58.33%, respectively while it was 6.67 and 10.67% in control (acetone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No. 55 flower extract increased T. chilonis activity on H. armigera eggs to 65.33% versus 10.67% control.

Material
No. 55e0
Treatment
flower extract of No. 55e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
T. chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity of T. chilonise0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
65.33e0
Qualifier
10.67e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the flower extract of No. 55 enhanced the activity of T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi by 65.33 and 68.67% on eggs of H. armigera, as compared to 10.67 and 12.55% in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No. 55 flower extract increased C. zastrowi silemi activity on H. armigera eggs to 68.67% versus 12.55% control.

Material
No. 55e0
Treatment
flower extract of No. 55e0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
C. zastrowi silemiChrysoperla zastrowie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity of T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemie0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
68.67%e0
Qualifier
12.55%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the flower extract of No. 55 enhanced the activity of T. chilonis and C. zastrowi silemi by 65.33 and 68.67% on eggs of H. armigera, as compared to 10.67 and 12.55% in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–183 · show in text ↑

botanical · Helicoverpa armigera · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.