Abstract
The present experiment entitled “Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)” was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.). The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design (SPD) with Irrigation methods (03): Main plot, Nutrient management (05): Sub plot treatments and three replications. The treatment consists of I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin) Dept of irrigation 6 cm (IW/CPE =1), I2 (Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)), I3 (Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)) at Main plot: Irrigation methods and N1 (100% RDN (90:60:40 kg NPK/ha)), N2 (100% RDN through (FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Microbial + Consortia + Jivamrit+ Decomposer)), N3 (50% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 50% % RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer), N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer), N5 (Control (No NPK)) at Sub plot: Nutrient management. The results showed at Main plot: Irrigation methods, the I3 (Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)) performed the best in terms of ear length (cm), ear weight (g), number of ears plant-1, physiological maturity, number of grains ear head-1, 1000 grain weight (g), grain yield (q ha-1), biomass yield (q ha-1), harvest index, which was followed closely by the treatment I2 (sprinkler irrigation) and the lowest was observed in the treatment I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin)). The results showed at Sub plot: Nutrient management, the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm), which was followed closely by the treatment N1 (100% RDN) and N2 (100% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Microbial + Consortia + Jivamrit+ Decomposer) and the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Surface plus sprinkler irrigation performed best for ear length, ear weight and number of ears per plant in late sown wheat, compared with surface irrigation (check basin).
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)e2
- Outcome
- ear length (cm), ear weight (g), number of ears plant-1e2
- Direction
- beste2
- Comparator
- I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))e3
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e2“the I3 (Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)) performed the best in terms of ear length (cm), ear weight (g), number of ears plant-1, physiological maturity, number of grains ear head-1, 1000 grain weight (g), grain yield (q ha-1), biomass yield (q ha-1), harvest index”
e3“the lowest was observed in the treatment I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))”
Claim · model-written summary
Surface plus sprinkler irrigation performed best for physiological maturity, grains per ear and 1000 grain weight in late sown wheat, compared with surface irrigation (check basin).
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)e2
- Outcome
- physiological maturity, number of grains ear head-1, 1000 grain weight (g)e2
- Direction
- beste2
- Comparator
- I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))e3
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e2“the I3 (Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)) performed the best in terms of ear length (cm), ear weight (g), number of ears plant-1, physiological maturity, number of grains ear head-1, 1000 grain weight (g), grain yield (q ha-1), biomass yield (q ha-1), harvest index”
e3“the lowest was observed in the treatment I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))”
Claim · model-written summary
Surface plus sprinkler irrigation performed best for grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index in late sown wheat, compared with surface irrigation (check basin).
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)e2
- Outcome
- grain yield (q ha-1), biomass yield (q ha-1), harvest indexe2
- Direction
- beste2
- Comparator
- I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))e3
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e2“the I3 (Surface + Sprinkler Irrigation (Dept of irrigation 3 cm)) performed the best in terms of ear length (cm), ear weight (g), number of ears plant-1, physiological maturity, number of grains ear head-1, 1000 grain weight (g), grain yield (q ha-1), biomass yield (q ha-1), harvest index”
e3“the lowest was observed in the treatment I1 (Surface Irrigation (Check Basin))”
Claim · model-written summary
The N4 nutrient treatment performed best for plant population, plant height and number of tillers in late sown wheat, compared with the control N5.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N4e4
- Outcome
- plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2)e4
- Direction
- beste4
- Comparator
- N5 (Control)e5
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e4“the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)”
e5“the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control)”
Claim · model-written summary
The N4 nutrient treatment performed best for plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering and milking stage in late sown wheat, compared with the control N5.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N4e4
- Outcome
- plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stagee4
- Direction
- beste4
- Comparator
- N5 (Control)e5
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e4“the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)”
e5“the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control)”
Claim · model-written summary
The N4 nutrient treatment performed best for plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering and milking stage in late sown wheat, compared with the control N5.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N4e4
- Outcome
- plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stagee4
- Direction
- beste4
- Comparator
- N5 (Control)e5
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e4“the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)”
e5“the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control)”
Claim · model-written summary
The N4 nutrient treatment performed best for number of active leaves, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate in late sown wheat, compared with the control N5.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N4e4
- Outcome
- number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2)e4
- Direction
- beste4
- Comparator
- N5 (Control)e5
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e4“the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)”
e5“the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control)”
Claim · model-written summary
The N4 nutrient treatment performed best for relative growth rate, water expanse and water expanse efficiency in late sown wheat, compared with the control N5.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N4e4
- Outcome
- relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)e4
- Direction
- beste4
- Comparator
- N5 (Control)e5
- Setting
- Bilaspure1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of irrigation methods and nutrient managements on growth of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“was conducted during rabi season in year 2023-24 at Instructional cum research farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur, (C.G.)”
e4“the N4 (50% RDN through Urea + 25% RDN through enriched FYM with microbial Consortia + 25% RDN through FYM enriched by Rock Phosphate + Consortia + Jivamrit + decomposer) performed the best in terms of plant population (no. m-2), plant height (cm), Number of tillers (no. m-2), plant canopy temperature at CRI, flowering, milking stage, plant canopy humidity at CRI, flowering, milking stage, number of active leaves plant-1, dry matter accumulation (g day-1 plant-1), crop growth rate (CGR) (g day-1 m-2), relative growth rate (RGR) (g g-1 day-1), water expanse (mm) and water expanse efficiency (kg cm)”
e5“the lowest was observed in the treatment N5 (Control)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.