Paper · 2025 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Thermal stress in the acclimatization of micropropagated banana plantlets, supplemented with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Natália da S. Dantas; Jackelyne de L. Machado; Antonio P. M. de Brito; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Micropropagated banana plantlets need acclimatization to reduce the stresses caused by the change from in vitro to ex vitro environment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of thermal stress on the acclimatization of micropropagated plantlets of banana cultivar ‘Prata Catarina’, supplemented with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Four applications of the LPPC159 strain, belonging to the genus Bacillus were performed every 15 days. Inoculated plantlets did not show differences in the biometric variables compared to fertilized plantlets. Plantlets acclimatized for seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse showed greater pseudostem diameter, fresh and dry mass, and higher accumulations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Na, B, and Cu. No significant differences were observed between inoculated and non-inoculated plantlets. Inoculations had positive and negative effects only on the accumulations of N and Cu, respectively. The lowest thermal indices were observed for plantlets of T5 (7 days in a controlled environment + 7 days in a tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse) and T1 (14 days in a shade tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse), promoting better thermal comfort for plantlets of these treatments. Using shade in the acclimatization phase combined with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promoted gains in pseudostem diameter, fresh mass, dry mass, and nutrient accumulation in the plantlets. These conditions also allowed reductions in thermal stress in the acclimatization phase of micropropagated plantlets of banana cultivar ‘Prata Catarina’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets inoculated with the Bacillus PGPR did not differ in biometric variables from fertilized plantlets.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Inoculated plantletse0
Outcome
biometric variablese0
Direction
did not show differencese0
Comparator
fertilized plantletse0

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculated plantlets did not show differences in the biometric variables compared to fertilized plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets acclimatized for seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse showed greater pseudostem diameter, fresh mass and dry mass.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhousee0
Outcome
pseudostem diameter, fresh and dry masse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plantlets acclimatized for seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse showed greater pseudostem diameter, fresh and dry mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same acclimatization regime gave higher accumulations of N, P and K.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhousee0
Outcome
accumulations of N, P, Ke1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher accumulations of N, P, K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same acclimatization regime gave higher accumulations of Ca, Mg and S.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhousee0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, Se1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher accumulations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same acclimatization regime gave higher accumulations of Na, B and Cu.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhousee0
Outcome
Na, B, and Cue1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“seven days under controlled conditions, seven days in tunnel and 46 days in greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher accumulations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Na, B, and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences were observed between inoculated and non-inoculated plantlets.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantletse0

Not reportedOutcome

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant differences were observed between inoculated and non-inoculated plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation had a positive effect on the accumulation of N.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Inoculationse0
Outcome
accumulations of Ne0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculations had positive and negative effects only on the accumulations of N and Cu, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation had a negative effect on the accumulation of Cu.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Inoculationse0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculations had positive and negative effects only on the accumulations of N and Cu, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest thermal indices were observed for plantlets of treatment T5 (7 days in a controlled environment, 7 days in a tunnel and 46 days in a greenhouse).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
T5 (7 days in a controlled environment + 7 days in a tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse)e1
Outcome
lowest thermal indicese0

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest thermal indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“T5 (7 days in a controlled environment + 7 days in a tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest thermal indices were observed for plantlets of treatment T1 (14 days in a shade tunnel and 46 days in a greenhouse).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
T1 (14 days in a shade tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse)e1
Outcome
lowest thermal indicese0

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest thermal indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1 (14 days in a shade tunnel + 46 days in a greenhouse)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1205 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cultivation system · growth · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.