Paper · 2025 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Water productivity of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes

Madhu Dhingra; M.S. Kahlon; Jeevanjot Dhaliwal

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mustard (Brassica juncea) being a low water requiring crop provides a good alternative for crop diversification in the over-exploited region of north-west India. A two year field experiment was conducted in split plot design with three irrigation regimes in main plot viz. no post sowing irrigation (I0), one irrigation (I1) at 4 weeks after sowing (WAS) and two irrigations (I2)- one at 4 WAS and second in start of January and two tillage practices in sub-plot – conventional and deep tillage. The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS), SPAD value (45.88 at 105 DAS), number of siliquae plant-1 (409.30), seed (12.05 q ha-1) and stover yield (42.04 q ha-1). However, the seed yield was statistically similar (p=0.05) under I1 and I2 irrigation regime during second year. Reduced mechanical resistance and higher periodic soil moisture content was observed in deep tilled plots. Deep tillage resulted in gain of seed yield (1.12 q ha-1) and stover yield (3.11 q ha-1) compared to conventional tillage. Water productivity was highest in plots with deep tillage and I1 irrigation regime. Seed yield of Brassica juncea with deep tillage and I1 was equivalent to conventional tillage with I2 thus suggesting saving of irrigation water (7.5 cm) with deep tillage. Therefore, study findings demonstrated that deep tillage with supplemental irrigation can be potential option for improving yield and water productivity of mustard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations yielded higher relative leaf water content of 85.65 at 105 DAS.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I2 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
relative leaf water contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
85.65 at 105 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations yielded a higher SPAD value of 45.88 at 105 DAS.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I2 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
45.88 at 105 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS), SPAD value (45.88 at 105 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations yielded a higher number of siliquae per plant, 409.30.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I2 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
number of siliquae plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
409.30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS), SPAD value (45.88 at 105 DAS), number of siliquae plant-1 (409.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations yielded higher seed yield of 12.05 q ha-1.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I2 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.05 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS), SPAD value (45.88 at 105 DAS), number of siliquae plant-1 (409.30), seed (12.05 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations yielded higher stover yield of 42.04 q ha-1.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I2 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.04 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I2 irrigation regime resulted in higher relative leaf water content (85.65 at 105 DAS), SPAD value (45.88 at 105 DAS), number of siliquae plant-1 (409.30), seed (12.05 q ha-1) and stover yield (42.04 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year seed yield was statistically similar under one and two irrigations.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
I1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
statistically similare0
Qualifier
during second yeare0
Comparator
I2 irrigation regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield was statistically similar (p=0.05) under I1 and I2 irrigation regime during second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage reduced soil mechanical resistance.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
deep tilled plotse0
Outcome
mechanical resistancee0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced mechanical resistance and higher periodic soil moisture content was observed in deep tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased periodic soil moisture content.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
deep tilled plotse0
Outcome
periodic soil moisture contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced mechanical resistance and higher periodic soil moisture content was observed in deep tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage raised seed yield by 1.12 q ha-1 over conventional tillage.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
gaine0
Value
1.12 q ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage resulted in gain of seed yield (1.12 q ha-1) and stover yield (3.11 q ha-1) compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage raised stover yield by 3.11 q ha-1 over conventional tillage.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
gaine0
Value
3.11 q ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage resulted in gain of seed yield (1.12 q ha-1) and stover yield (3.11 q ha-1) compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity was highest with deep tillage and one irrigation.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
deep tillage and I1 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
Water productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water productivity was highest in plots with deep tillage and I1 irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage with one irrigation gave equivalent seed yield to conventional tillage with two irrigations, saving 7.5 cm of water.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
deep tillage and I1e0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
equivalente0
Value
7.5 cme0
Comparator
conventional tillage with I2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of Brassica juncea with deep tillage and I1 was equivalent to conventional tillage with I2 thus suggesting saving of irrigation water (7.5 cm) with deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)] in relation to deep tillage and irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend deep tillage with supplemental irrigation to improve mustard yield and water productivity.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
deep tillage with supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
improving yield and water productivitye0

Verbatim

e0

“deep tillage with supplemental irrigation can be potential option for improving yield and water productivity of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1472 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.