Abstract
The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions. Application of Glomus fasciculatum and G. mosseae at 10 mg was found effective in suppressing final populations of rootknot nematode to the extent of 37.5 and 33.7%, respectively, in a pot experiment conducted in screenhouse. Besides suppressing nematode reproduction parameters, mycorrhizae treatments also augmented plant growth variables. The efficacy of the two Glomus spp. was further examined against M. incognita on cucumber under protected conditions. Each treatment significantly enhanced shoot growth and yield, while it reduced the galls, egg masses, eggs and final nematode population compared to the control. Under protected condition, the nematode population was reduced up to 70.0 and 68.8% with G. fasciculatum @ 2 g per m2 applied at the time of planting (ATP) and 45 days after planting (DAP), followed by G. mosseae @ 2 g per m2 ATP and 45 DAP, respectively. The study has revealed that mycorrhizae can be used for managing root-knot nematode in cucumber.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus fasciculatum application reduced final root-knot nematode populations by 37.5% in screenhouse pots.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0 - Treatment
- Application of Glomus fasciculatum and G. mosseae at 10 mge1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pest - Second interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
- Outcome
- final populations of rootknot nematodee1
- Direction
- suppressinge1
- Value
- 37.5e1
- Setting
- screenhousee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e1“Application of Glomus fasciculatum and G. mosseae at 10 mg was found effective in suppressing final populations of rootknot nematode to the extent of 37.5 and 33.7%, respectively, in a pot experiment conducted in screenhouse”
Claim · model-written summary
G. mosseae application reduced final root-knot nematode populations by 33.7% in screenhouse pots.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Application of Glomus fasciculatum and G. mosseae at 10 mge1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- G. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee1symbiont - Outcome
- final populations of rootknot nematodee1
- Direction
- suppressinge1
- Value
- 33.7%e1
- Setting
- screenhousee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e1“Application of Glomus fasciculatum and G. mosseae at 10 mg was found effective in suppressing final populations of rootknot nematode to the extent of 37.5 and 33.7%, respectively, in a pot experiment conducted in screenhouse”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatments significantly enhanced shoot growth and yield of cucumber compared with control under protected conditions.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Each treatmente2
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- shoot growth and yielde2
- Direction
- significantly enhancede2
- Comparator
- controle2
- Setting
- protected conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e2“Each treatment significantly enhanced shoot growth and yield, while it reduced the galls, egg masses, eggs and final nematode population compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatments reduced galls, egg masses and eggs on cucumber compared with control.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Each treatmente2
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- galls, egg masses, eggse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e2“Each treatment significantly enhanced shoot growth and yield, while it reduced the galls, egg masses, eggs and final nematode population compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatments reduced the final nematode population on cucumber compared with control.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Each treatmente2
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- final nematode populatione2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e2“Each treatment significantly enhanced shoot growth and yield, while it reduced the galls, egg masses, eggs and final nematode population compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
G. fasciculatum at 2 g per m2 applied at planting reduced the nematode population by up to 70.0% under protected conditions.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- G. fasciculatum @ 2 g per m2 applied at the time of planting (ATP)e3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse3symbiont
- Outcome
- nematode populatione3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 70.0e3
- Setting
- protected conditione3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e3“Under protected condition, the nematode population was reduced up to 70.0 and 68.8% with G. fasciculatum @ 2 g per m2 applied at the time of planting (ATP) and 45 days after planting (DAP), followed by G. mosseae @ 2 g per m2 ATP and 45 DAP, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
G. mosseae at 2 g per m2 applied at planting and 45 days later reduced the nematode population by 68.8% under protected conditions.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- G. mosseae @ 2 g per m2 ATPe3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee3symbiont
- Outcome
- nematode populatione3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 68.8%e3
- Setting
- protected conditione3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e3“Under protected condition, the nematode population was reduced up to 70.0 and 68.8% with G. fasciculatum @ 2 g per m2 applied at the time of planting (ATP) and 45 days after planting (DAP), followed by G. mosseae @ 2 g per m2 ATP and 45 DAP, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatments augmented plant growth variables in cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizae treatmentse4
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- plant growth variablese4
- Direction
- augmentede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e4“Besides suppressing nematode reproduction parameters, mycorrhizae treatments also augmented plant growth variables”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal treatments suppressed nematode reproduction parameters.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizae treatmentse4
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- nematode reproduction parameterse4
- Direction
- suppressinge4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e4“Besides suppressing nematode reproduction parameters, mycorrhizae treatments also augmented plant growth variables”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizae can be used to manage root-knot nematode in cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizaee5
- Outcome
- managing root-knot nematodee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potential of mycorrhizae was assessed against Meloidogyne incognita on cucumber under screenhouse and protected conditions”
e5“mycorrhizae can be used for managing root-knot nematode in cucumber”
The same questions in other papers
Funneliformis mosseae · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.