Paper · 2011 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal(AM)Fungi Suppresses Root Knot Nematode on Cucumber

Guoyuan Zou

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus mosseae,Glomus intraradices,and the mixed inocula on the root knot nematode(Meloidogyne incognita)on the young seedling and transplant seedling of cucumber.The results showed that the mixed inocula could not restrain the root knot to colonize the root of the young seedling when the colonization rate of the AM fungi was lower.After the seedling of cucumber transplanted,the three AM fungi tested significantly reduced the root knot index,and increased shoot dry weight,root dry weight,height of plant,and nutrient uptake.It was showed that AM fungi can restrain the disease of the root knot nematode on the cucumber by the mycorrhizal symbiont.G.intraradices,G.mosseae were more effective than others at increasing plant growth,nutrient uptake,and the supression of the root knot nematode.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed mycorrhizal inoculum did not restrain nematode root colonization of young cucumber seedlings at low fungal colonization.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
mixed inoculae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
root knot to colonize the roote0
Direction
could not restraine0
Qualifier
when the colonization rate of the AM fungi was lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixed inocula could not restrain the root knot to colonize the root of the young seedling when the colonization rate of the AM fungi was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“young seedling and transplant seedling of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–251 · show in text ↑
e2

“root knot nematode(Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three AM fungi significantly reduced the root knot index after transplanting cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
three AM fungie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
root knot indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the seedling of cucumber transplanted,the three AM fungi tested significantly reduced the root knot index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–534 · show in text ↑
e1

“root knot nematode(Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three AM fungi increased shoot dry weight, root dry weight and plant height after transplanting.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
three AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight,root dry weight,height of plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the seedling of cucumber transplanted,the three AM fungi tested significantly reduced the root knot index,and increased shoot dry weight,root dry weight,height of plant,and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three AM fungi increased cucumber nutrient uptake after transplanting.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
three AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the seedling of cucumber transplanted,the three AM fungi tested significantly reduced the root knot index,and increased shoot dry weight,root dry weight,height of plant,and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices was more effective than other fungi for growth, nutrient uptake and nematode suppression.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
G.intraradicese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
G.intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth,nutrient uptake,and the supression of the root knot nematodee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G.intraradices,G.mosseae were more effective than others at increasing plant growth,nutrient uptake,and the supression of the root knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplant seedling of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–251 · show in text ↑
e2

“root knot nematode(Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae was more effective than other fungi for growth, nutrient uptake and nematode suppression.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
G.mosseaee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
G.mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth,nutrient uptake,and the supression of the root knot nematodee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G.intraradices,G.mosseae were more effective than others at increasing plant growth,nutrient uptake,and the supression of the root knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplant seedling of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–251 · show in text ↑
e2

“root knot nematode(Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.