Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of 2024 at the Research Farm, Abhilashi University, Mandi (H.P.) to examine effect of foliar and soil application of zinc for improving the production and productivity of Wheat in rainfed Rice-Wheat cropping system under mid-hill zone of Himachal Pradesh. Eight treatments were used in the randomized block design trial, which was replicated thrice. The experiment was performed in RBD design with 8 treatment and were replicated thrice. The different treatment combination were T₁ - Control, T₂ - 100% RDN, T₃ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @25 kg ha-1, T₄ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 0.5%, T₅ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 1%, T₆ - 100% RDN + 2 foliar applications of zinc @ 0.5%, T₇ - 100% RDN + 2 foliar applications of zinc @ 1%, and T₈ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 0.5% + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 1%. Treatment T₈ had the greatest values of growth metrics, such as plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2), according to the data analysis. Among the other treatments, treatment T8 also produced the highest yield qualities, including the number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1. Throughout the research, the highest yields (grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹) were all observed under treatment T₈. This was statistically equivalent to treatment T₇, which consisted of two foliar sprays of zinc at 1% and 100% RDN. The test weight (g) and harvest index (%) were not significant. The study revealed that the both foliar and soil application of zinc has improved the growth characteristics, yield attribute and yield of wheat. Finally, the study's findings also demonstrated the significance of zinc in raising grain production, and a thorough, large-scale examination is a good goal for raising grain yield in cereals.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
T₈ gave the greatest plant height, tiller count and matter accumulation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T₈e0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2)e0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity of wheat”
e0“Treatment T₈ had the greatest values of growth metrics, such as plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave the highest effective tillers, spike length and grains per spike.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T8e0
- Outcome
- number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity of wheat”
e0“treatment T8 also produced the highest yield qualities, including the number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T₈ produced the highest grain, straw and biological yields.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T₈e0
- Outcome
- grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity of wheat”
e0“highest yields (grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹) were all observed under treatment T₈”
Claim · model-written summary
T₈ yields were statistically equivalent to T₇ yields.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T₈e1
- Outcome
- statistically equivalente0
- Direction
- statistically equivalente0
- Comparator
- treatment T₇e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity of wheat”
e0“This was statistically equivalent to treatment T₇, which consisted of two foliar sprays of zinc at 1% and 100% RDN”
e1“under treatment T₈”
Claim · model-written summary
Test weight and harvest index differences were not significant.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- test weight (g) and harvest index (%)e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“productivity of wheat”
e0“The test weight (g) and harvest index (%) were not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined foliar and soil zinc improved wheat growth, yield attributes and yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- both foliar and soil application of zince0
- Outcome
- growth characteristics, yield attribute and yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“both foliar and soil application of zinc has improved the growth characteristics, yield attribute and yield of wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.