Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of foliar and soil application of zinc for improving the production and productivity of wheat in rainfed rice-wheat cropping system under mid-hill zone of Himachal Pradesh

Nishant Thakur; Mohd Shah Alam

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of 2024 at the Research Farm, Abhilashi University, Mandi (H.P.) to examine effect of foliar and soil application of zinc for improving the production and productivity of Wheat in rainfed Rice-Wheat cropping system under mid-hill zone of Himachal Pradesh. Eight treatments were used in the randomized block design trial, which was replicated thrice. The experiment was performed in RBD design with 8 treatment and were replicated thrice. The different treatment combination were T₁ - Control, T₂ - 100% RDN, T₃ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @25 kg ha-1, T₄ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 0.5%, T₅ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 1%, T₆ - 100% RDN + 2 foliar applications of zinc @ 0.5%, T₇ - 100% RDN + 2 foliar applications of zinc @ 1%, and T₈ - 100% RDN + Soil application of zinc @ 25 kg ha⁻¹ + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 0.5% + 1 foliar application of zinc @ 1%. Treatment T₈ had the greatest values of growth metrics, such as plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2), according to the data analysis. Among the other treatments, treatment T8 also produced the highest yield qualities, including the number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1. Throughout the research, the highest yields (grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹) were all observed under treatment T₈. This was statistically equivalent to treatment T₇, which consisted of two foliar sprays of zinc at 1% and 100% RDN. The test weight (g) and harvest index (%) were not significant. The study revealed that the both foliar and soil application of zinc has improved the growth characteristics, yield attribute and yield of wheat. Finally, the study's findings also demonstrated the significance of zinc in raising grain production, and a thorough, large-scale examination is a good goal for raising grain yield in cereals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₈ gave the greatest plant height, tiller count and matter accumulation.

Treatment
T₈e0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2)e0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment T₈ had the greatest values of growth metrics, such as plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), and matter accumulation (g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave the highest effective tillers, spike length and grains per spike.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment T8 also produced the highest yield qualities, including the number of effective tillers (m-2), spike length (cm) and number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T₈ produced the highest grain, straw and biological yields.

Treatment
T₈e0
Outcome
grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest yields (grain yield (q ha⁻¹), straw yield (q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (q ha⁻¹) were all observed under treatment T₈”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T₈ yields were statistically equivalent to T₇ yields.

Treatment
T₈e1
Outcome
statistically equivalente0
Direction
statistically equivalente0
Comparator
treatment T₇e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was statistically equivalent to treatment T₇, which consisted of two foliar sprays of zinc at 1% and 100% RDN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1666 · show in text ↑
e1

“under treatment T₈”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight and harvest index differences were not significant.

Outcome
test weight (g) and harvest index (%)e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The test weight (g) and harvest index (%) were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar and soil zinc improved wheat growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
both foliar and soil application of zince0
Outcome
growth characteristics, yield attribute and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both foliar and soil application of zinc has improved the growth characteristics, yield attribute and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1876 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.