Paper · 2025 · Weed Science

Competitive ability of drought-tolerant corn hybrids in the presence of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) under optimal and reduced irrigation levels

Mercy A. Odemba; Earl Creech; Corey Ransom; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) is among the most troublesome weeds in the Intermountain West affecting corn ( Zea mays L.) production and contributing to significant yield losses, in addition to losses caused by water stress. Improvements in agricultural technology such as use of drought-tolerant (DT) corn hybrids has helped minimize the impact of water stress on corn yields. However, it is not known how the use of hybrids affects the interactions between weeds and corn. This work evaluated the competitive effects of A. retroflexus on DT and drought-susceptible (DS) corn hybrids exposed to optimal and reduced irrigation levels in a semi-controlled study. The semi-controlled environment was established in a rainout shelter with corn maintained at a density of 66,482 plants ha −1 and A. retroflexus varied at densities of 0, 33,241, and 66,482 plants ha −1 that were then provided either optimal or reduced irrigation (100% and 50%). We observed a 45% reduction in the shoot biomass of DS corn under reduced irrigation, while the shoot biomass of DT corn remained the same under both irrigation levels in Season 1. In Season 2, both hybrids experienced a decrease in shoot biomass under reduced irrigation. Amaranthus retroflexus exhibited an 80% increase in shoot biomass when growing with DS corn exposed to reduced irrigation, compared with its growth with DS corn exposed to optimal irrigation. Conversely, DT corn negatively impacted A. retroflexus shoot biomass under reduced irrigation, resulting in only a 9% difference between the reduced and optimally irrigated plots. These findings suggest that DT corn may mitigate water stress while also providing the additional benefit of improved competition against weeds, effectively suppressing their growth in water-stressed environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation lowered drought-susceptible corn shoot biomass by 45% in Season 1.

Material
DS corne0
Treatment
reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a 45% reduction in the shoot biomass of DS corn under reduced irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant corn shoot biomass remained unchanged across irrigation levels in Season 1.

Material
DT corne0
Treatment
both irrigation levelse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
remained the samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot biomass of DT corn remained the same under both irrigation levels in Season 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both corn hybrids had lower shoot biomass under reduced irrigation in Season 2.

Material
both hybridse0
Treatment
reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Season 2, both hybrids experienced a decrease in shoot biomass under reduced irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigweed shoot biomass was 80% higher with drought-susceptible corn under reduced than optimal irrigation.

Material
DS corne0
Treatment
reduced irrigatione0
Interactor
Amaranthus retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weed
Outcome
Amaranthus retroflexus exhibited an 80% increase in shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
optimal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus retroflexus exhibited an 80% increase in shoot biomass when growing with DS corn exposed to reduced irrigation, compared with its growth with DS corn exposed to optimal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With drought-tolerant corn, pigweed shoot biomass differed by only 9% between irrigation levels.

Material
DT corne0
Treatment
reduced irrigatione0
Interactor
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weed
Outcome
A. retroflexus shoot biomasse0
Direction
negatively impactede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
optimally irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DT corn negatively impacted A. retroflexus shoot biomass under reduced irrigation, resulting in only a 9% difference between the reduced and optimally irrigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1609 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

irrigation · Amaranthus retroflexus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.