Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Storage effects on the quality of osmotically dehydrated cauliflower

Vijai Kumar; Neelash Chauhan; Jaivir Singh; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Dehydration is a widely adopted method for extending the shelf life of vegetables and ensuring their availability throughout the year. This study evaluated the impact of four pre-treatments Control (untreated), Blanching, Citric Acid (0.25%), and Potassium Metabisulfite (KMS, 0.25%) on the physico-chemical quality of osmotic dehydrated cauliflower (Brassica oleracea botrytis) stored for 120 days under ambient conditions. Fresh cauliflower was processed into dehydrated form and samples were analyzed at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days for pH, moisture content, titratable acidity, optical density, ash content, and ascorbic acid levels. The Results showed a gradual decline in pH and ascorbic acid across all treatments, with the control group deteriorating most rapidly. KMS-treated samples exhibited minimal pH reduction (from ~6.0 to ~5.7) and superior ascorbic acid retention, indicating strong preservation potential. The Citric acid treatment maintained a lower pH due to its acidic nature and demonstrated effective antimicrobial action. The Blanching offered better quality retention than the control but was less effective than chemical treatments. The Moisture content increased over time in all treatments, likely due to packaging permeability and ambient humidity, with KMS and citric acid showing the least gain. Titratable acidity increased during storage, particularly in untreated samples, reflecting microbial and enzymatic activity. Optical density decreased steadily, with KMS-treated powders retaining better visual quality. The Ash content showed slight reductions across treatments, with chemical treatments providing better mineral retention than control samples. Overall, potassium metabisulfite proved most effective in preserving the nutritional, chemical, and visual quality of cauliflower during storage. The use of KMS or citric acid as practical pre-treatments for commercial dehydration and storage, ensuring extended shelf life and enhanced market value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pH declined during storage across treatments, fastest in control.

Outcome
pHe0
Direction
declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gradual decline in pH and ascorbic acid across all treatments, with the control group deteriorating most rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid declined during storage across treatments.

Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gradual decline in pH and ascorbic acid across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KMS minimized pH reduction from about 6.0 to about 5.7.

Treatment
KMSe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
from ~6.0 to ~5.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KMS-treated samples exhibited minimal pH reduction (from ~6.0 to ~5.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KMS improved ascorbic acid retention.

Treatment
KMSe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid retentione0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KMS-treated samples exhibited minimal pH reduction (from ~6.0 to ~5.7) and superior ascorbic acid retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid maintained lower pH.

Treatment
Citric acide0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citric acid treatment maintained a lower pH due to its acidic nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid showed antimicrobial action.

Treatment
Citric acide0
Outcome
antimicrobial actione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citric acid treatment maintained a lower pH due to its acidic nature and demonstrated effective antimicrobial action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanching retained quality better than control but less than chemical treatments.

Treatment
Blanchinge0
Outcome
quality retentione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blanching offered better quality retention than the control but was less effective than chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture increased during storage in all treatments.

Outcome
Moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content increased over time in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KMS and citric acid showed the least moisture gain.

Outcome
Moisture contente1
Direction
least gaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with KMS and citric acid showing the least gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1328 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moisture content increased over time in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity increased during storage, especially untreated.

Outcome
Titratable aciditye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity increased during storage, particularly in untreated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optical density decreased steadily.

Outcome
Optical densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optical density decreased steadily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KMS retained better visual quality.

Treatment
KMSe0
Outcome
visual qualitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KMS-treated powders retaining better visual quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash content fell slightly.

Outcome
Ash contente0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ash content showed slight reductions across treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments retained minerals better than controls.

Treatment
chemical treatmentse0
Outcome
mineral retentione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical treatments providing better mineral retention than control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium metabisulfite was most effective overall in preserving cauliflower quality.

Treatment
potassium metabisulfitee0
Outcome
nutritional, chemical, and visual qualitye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium metabisulfite proved most effective in preserving the nutritional, chemical, and visual quality of cauliflower during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1835 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend KMS or citric acid pretreatment for commercial dehydration and storage.

Outcome
practical pre-treatments for commercial dehydration and storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of KMS or citric acid as practical pre-treatments for commercial dehydration and storage, ensuring extended shelf life and enhanced market value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1989 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.