Paper · 2025 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS AND ESSENTIAL OILS ON EARLY BLIGHT OF TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.) CAUSED BY ALTERNARIA SOLANI (ELLIS) MARTIN

Aditi Thakur; Shashi Tiwari; N Bessadat; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the principal vegetable crop grown for its nutritional and economic value.Major limiting factor in tomato production is early blight caused by Alternaria solani, which causes severe yield loss.This study was carried out in the Rabi season of 2023-2024 at SHUATS, Prayagraj to evaluate the efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens in combination with essential oils for the biological management of early blight.The field experiment followed a Randomized Block Design (RBD) where seven treatments were compared against three replications.Seed treatment and foliar sprays consisting of 2-10 ml of P. fluorescens and 3% concentration of essential oils (neem, castor, clove, eucalyptus, and mustard) were included in treatments.For comparison, a chemical control was also included.Percent Disease Intensity (PDI) were observed at 60-, 75-, and 90-days post transplanting, growth attributes, yield and cost benefit ratio.Among the combinations the combination of P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%) was the most effective, having the lowest PDI (16.23% at 90 DAT), improved plant height and branching, and the highest yield (25.63 t ha-1).In addition, this treatment provided the highest economic return.These results suggest that the integration of biological control agents and essential oils may provide sustainable, ecofriendly alternative to control early blight in tomatoes.Using this approach decreases chemical pesticide use and promotes better sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens plus neem oil had the lowest early-blight intensity, 16.23% at 90 DAT.

Treatment
P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%)e0
Interactor
Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
16.23%e0
Qualifier
90 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%) was the most effective, having the lowest PDI (16.23% at 90 DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.) CAUSED BY ALTERNARIA SOLANI (ELLIS) MARTIN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination improved plant height and branching.

Treatment
P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%)e0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height and branchinge0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%) was the most effective, having the lowest PDI (16.23% at 90 DAT), improved plant height and branching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest yield, 25.63 t ha-1.

Treatment
P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%)e0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.63 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of P. fluorescens (2 ml) + neem oil (3%) was the most effective, having the lowest PDI (16.23% at 90 DAT), improved plant height and branching, and the highest yield (25.63 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the highest economic return.

Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
economic returne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this treatment provided the highest economic return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–104 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Alternaria solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · Alternaria solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

botanical · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 126 positive, 12 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.