Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Impact of combined nutrient inputs on French bean and wheat yields in sustainable poplar based agroforestry systems

Susmita .; Vineet Kumar Uzma Manzoor; Shani Gulaiya

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the year 2017-18 at the Agroforestry Research Centre, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. Nine treatment combinations involving different proportions of recommended NPK fertilizers, farmyard manure (FYM), vermi-compost (VC), and a microbial inoculant (Pantnagar Nodule Endophyte-PNE 21) were evaluated for French bean and wheat. Results indicated that treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sources significantly improved plant growth parameters, yield attributes, and overall productivity compared to sole nutrient sources or control treatments. In French bean, the highest grain yield (25.50 q ha⁻¹), pod number (37.66), and pod length (13.60 cm) were recorded under treatment T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum), reflecting the benefits of balanced nutrient availability. In wheat, treatment T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹) achieved the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹), accompanied by a favorable harvest index (36.29%). These results were attributed to improved soil structure, moisture retention, microbial activity, and enhanced nutrient uptake due to organic amendments, in combination with the readily available nutrients from chemical fertilizers. Overall, the study concludes that integrated nutrient management practices optimize nutrient use efficiency, enhance crop performance, and contribute to sustainable intensification in Poplar-based agroforestry systems. The findings provide practical insights for improving the productivity and profitability of such systems while preserving soil health and ecosystem services.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources improved plant growth parameters in French bean and wheat relative to sole sources or controls.

Taxon
French bean and wheatPhaseolus vulgarisTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sourcese0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole nutrient sources or control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sources significantly improved plant growth parameters, yield attributes, and overall productivity compared to sole nutrient sources or control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources improved yield attributes in French bean and wheat relative to sole sources or controls.

Taxon
French bean and wheatPhaseolus vulgarisTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sourcese0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole nutrient sources or control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sources significantly improved plant growth parameters, yield attributes, and overall productivity compared to sole nutrient sources or control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources improved overall productivity in French bean and wheat relative to sole sources or controls.

Taxon
French bean and wheatPhaseolus vulgarisTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sourcese0
Outcome
overall productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole nutrient sources or control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments integrating organic and inorganic nutrient sources significantly improved plant growth parameters, yield attributes, and overall productivity compared to sole nutrient sources or control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean had the highest grain yield under treatment T₇ (25.50 q ha⁻¹).

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.50 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In French bean, the highest grain yield (25.50 q ha⁻¹), pod number (37.66), and pod length (13.60 cm) were recorded under treatment T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean had the highest pod number under treatment T₇ (37.66).

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)e0
Outcome
pod numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
37.66e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In French bean, the highest grain yield (25.50 q ha⁻¹), pod number (37.66), and pod length (13.60 cm) were recorded under treatment T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean had the highest pod length under treatment T₇ (13.60 cm).

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)e0
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.60 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In French bean, the highest grain yield (25.50 q ha⁻¹), pod number (37.66), and pod length (13.60 cm) were recorded under treatment T₇ (50% N through RDF + FYM + VC + inoculum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under treatment T₈ had the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
37.14 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, treatment T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹) achieved the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹), accompanied by a favorable harvest index (36.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under treatment T₈ had the highest straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹)e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
65.17 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, treatment T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹) achieved the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹), accompanied by a favorable harvest index (36.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under treatment T₈ had the highest biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹).

Treatment
T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹)e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
102.31 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, treatment T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹) achieved the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹), accompanied by a favorable harvest index (36.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under treatment T₈ had a favorable harvest index (36.29%).

Treatment
T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹)e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
favorablee0
Value
36.29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, treatment T₈ (50% N through NPK + 25% N through FYM @ 6 t ha⁻¹ + 25% N through VC @ 2 t ha⁻¹) achieved the highest grain yield (37.14 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (65.17 q ha⁻¹), and biological yield (102.31 q ha⁻¹), accompanied by a favorable harvest index (36.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1130 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.