Paper · 2025 · The Plant Phenome Journal

Hyperspectral reflectance‐based partial least squares regression models for predicting cotton leaf physiological traits

Ved Parkash; John L. Snider; Christopher M. Montes; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Alterations in the mechanistic drivers of photosynthesis have the potential to improve crop productivity, but their measurement is inherently time‐consuming using traditional methods. High‐throughput approaches to estimate photosynthesis using hyperspectral reflectance could be developed by leveraging variation in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf traits generated through nitrogen (N) management, synthetic growth regulation strategies, and leaf position within the canopy. Currently, no such models exist for cotton, and interactions among the aforementioned factors are relatively unexplored for cotton leaf traits. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of N application rate, mepiquat chloride (MC) management, and leaf position within the canopy on photosynthesis and its components, and (2) develop and validate hyperspectral reflectance‐based partial least squares regression (PLSR) models for predicting cotton leaf physiological traits. N rate and leaf position interacted to affect net photosynthetic rate ( A N ), electron transport rate, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b, while MC influenced only leaf pigments and specific leaf weight (SLW). A N reductions under N deficiency were driven by declines in the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation ( V c,max ) and ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate regeneration ( J max ), whereas high N had no effect on A N . PLSR models exhibited good to high predictive accuracy, with R 2 values ranging from 0.62 to 0.87 for most traits, except for SLW. These findings enhance our understanding of the physiological responses to N rate, MC strategy, and leaf position and highlight the potential of hyperspectral reflectance‐based PLSR as a high‐throughput tool for predicting leaf physiological traits to improve photosynthetic efficiency in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and leaf position interacted in their association with net photosynthetic and electron transport rates and chlorophyll a.

Organ / stage
leaf positione1
Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate ( A N ), electron transport rate, chlorophyll ae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“N rate and leaf position interacted to affect net photosynthetic rate ( A N ), electron transport rate, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and leaf position interacted to affect chlorophyll b.

Organ / stage
leaf positione1
Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
chlorophyll be1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“N rate and leaf position interacted to affect net photosynthetic rate ( A N ), electron transport rate, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride influenced leaf pigments and specific leaf weight only.

Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
leaf pigments and specific leaf weight (SLW)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“MC influenced only leaf pigments and specific leaf weight (SLW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1174 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency reduced net photosynthetic rate through declines in carboxylation and regeneration rates.

Treatment
N deficiencye1
Outcome
A Ne1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
declines in the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation ( V c,max ) and ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate regeneration ( J max )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“A N reductions under N deficiency were driven by declines in the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation ( V c,max ) and ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate regeneration ( J max )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen had no effect on net photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
high Ne1
Outcome
A Ne1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“high N had no effect on A N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1380 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflectance PLSR models predicted most traits with R² from 0.62 to 0.87.

Outcome
predictive accuracye1
Value
0.62 to 0.87e1
Qualifier
except for SLWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“PLSR models exhibited good to high predictive accuracy, with R 2 values ranging from 0.62 to 0.87 for most traits, except for SLW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1512 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Nitrogen deficiency decreased carbon assimilation in maize, cotton, and bean.

    Carbon Dioxide Uptake in Nitrogen‐Deficient Plants1 · 1969

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.