Paper · 2025 · Environmental and Experimental Biology

Relationship between pruning severity and reproductive performance in commercial pear orchards

Abdelkader Harizia; Abdelkader Benguerai; Yahia Boukhari; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Pruning is a key horticultural practice, which strongly influences flowering, fruit set, and overall yield in pear orchards. This study evaluated the effects of severe (short) versus conventional (long) winter pruning on reproductive performance and yield of ‘Santa Maria’ pear trees grown in an intensive orchard in Algeria. The findings demonstrated that severe pruning promoted floral bud initiation, increased flower abundance, and improved fruit set, with fruit set rates of 40.9% under severe pruning and 37.4% under conventional pruning. Strong positive correlations among floral bud number, flower density, and fruit set highlighted the coordinated nature of the reproductive response. Overall, severe winter pruning enhanced reproductive development and yield without compromising fruit set efficiency. These results suggest that optimizing pruning intensity may be an effective strategy to enhance productivity and sustainability in commercial pear production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning promoted floral bud initiation compared with conventional pruning in Santa Maria pear trees.

Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
floral bud initiatione0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
conventional pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings demonstrated that severe pruning promoted floral bud initiation, increased flower abundance, and improved fruit set, with fruit set rates of 40.9% under severe pruning and 37.4% under conventional pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe pruning increased flower abundance compared with conventional pruning.

Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
flower abundancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings demonstrated that severe pruning promoted floral bud initiation, increased flower abundance, and improved fruit set, with fruit set rates of 40.9% under severe pruning and 37.4% under conventional pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit set was 40.9% under severe pruning and exceeded 37.4% under conventional pruning.

Treatment
severe pruninge0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
improvede0
Value
40.9%e0
Qualifier
37.4%e0
Comparator
conventional pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings demonstrated that severe pruning promoted floral bud initiation, increased flower abundance, and improved fruit set, with fruit set rates of 40.9% under severe pruning and 37.4% under conventional pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral bud number, flower density, and fruit set were strongly positively correlated.

Organ / stage
floral bude0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
positive correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strong positive correlations among floral bud number, flower density, and fruit set highlighted the coordinated nature of the reproductive response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe winter pruning enhanced yield.

Treatment
severe winter pruninge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, severe winter pruning enhanced reproductive development and yield without compromising fruit set efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe winter pruning did not compromise fruit set efficiency.

Treatment
severe winter pruninge0
Outcome
fruit set efficiencye0
Direction
without compromisinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, severe winter pruning enhanced reproductive development and yield without compromising fruit set efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest optimizing pruning intensity to improve commercial pear productivity and sustainability.

Outcome
optimizing pruning intensitye0
Qualifier
enhance productivity and sustainabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that optimizing pruning intensity may be an effective strategy to enhance productivity and sustainability in commercial pear production systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–978 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.