Paper · 2005 · Acta Horticulturae

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RATES OF PROHEXADIONECALCIUM AND GIRDLING ON SHOOT GROWTH AND FRUIT QUALITY WHEN APPLIED TO DIFFERENT PEAR CULTIVARS

J.J. Meintjes; P. Stassen; K.I. Theron

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Prohexadione-Calcium (P-Ca) is a promising new shoot growth retardant that is already registered on apples in North America (Apogee®) and in Europe (Regalis®). This gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor with limited persistence and low toxicity was tested on five Pyrus communis cultivars: ‘Rosemarie’, ‘Flamingo’, ‘Early Bon Chretien’, ‘Packham’s Triumph’ and ‘Forelle’. P-Ca was able to reduce shoot growth in all of the cultivars, but there was a marked difference in sensitivity towards different rates of P-Ca between the different cultivars. Fruit set was improved in ‘Rosemarie’, ‘Forelle’ and ‘Early Bon Chretien’, which led to a decrease in final fruit size of ‘Rosemarie’. P-Ca caused a decrease in return bloom in ‘Packham’s Triumph’ and ‘Forelle’. Girdling only reduced shoot growth in ‘Forelle’ but did not improve fruit set in any of the cultivars. Girdling improved final fruit weight of ‘Flamingo’, increased fruit length in ‘Early Bon Chretien’ and increased return bloom in all of the cultivars except ‘Packham’s Triumph’. The five cultivars are categorised according to their sensitivity towards P-Ca: ‘Rosemarie’ > ‘Flamingo’ = ‘Early Bon Chretien’ = ‘Packham’s Triumph’ > ‘Forelle’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca reduced shoot growth in all five pear cultivars.

Treatment
P-Cae0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P-Ca was able to reduce shoot growth in all of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear cultivars differed in sensitivity to P-Ca rate.

Treatment
different rates of P-Cae0
Outcome
sensitivitye0
Direction
differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a marked difference in sensitivity towards different rates of P-Ca between the different cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca improved fruit set in Rosemarie.

Material
‘Rosemarie’e0
Treatment
P-Cae1
Outcome
Fruit sete0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit set was improved in ‘Rosemarie’, ‘Forelle’ and ‘Early Bon Chretien’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“P-Ca was able to reduce shoot growth in all of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca improved fruit set in Forelle.

Material
‘Forelle’e0
Treatment
P-Cae1
Outcome
Fruit sete0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit set was improved in ‘Rosemarie’, ‘Forelle’ and ‘Early Bon Chretien’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“P-Ca was able to reduce shoot growth in all of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca improved fruit set in Early Bon Chretien.

Material
‘Early Bon Chretien’e0
Treatment
P-Cae1
Outcome
Fruit sete0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit set was improved in ‘Rosemarie’, ‘Forelle’ and ‘Early Bon Chretien’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“P-Ca was able to reduce shoot growth in all of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–429 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved fruit set decreased final fruit size in Rosemarie.

Material
‘Rosemarie’e0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
final fruit sizee0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which led to a decrease in final fruit size of ‘Rosemarie’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca decreased return bloom in Packham’s Triumph.

Material
‘Packham’s Triumph’e0
Treatment
P-Cae0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P-Ca caused a decrease in return bloom in ‘Packham’s Triumph’ and ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca decreased return bloom in Forelle.

Material
‘Forelle’e0
Treatment
P-Cae0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P-Ca caused a decrease in return bloom in ‘Packham’s Triumph’ and ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling reduced shoot growth in Forelle only.

Material
‘Forelle’e0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling only reduced shoot growth in ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling did not improve fruit set in any cultivar.

Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling only reduced shoot growth in ‘Forelle’ but did not improve fruit set in any of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling improved final fruit weight in Flamingo.

Material
‘Flamingo’e0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
final fruit weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling improved final fruit weight of ‘Flamingo’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased fruit length in Early Bon Chretien.

Material
‘Early Bon Chretien’e0
Treatment
Girdlinge1
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fruit length in ‘Early Bon Chretien’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Girdling only reduced shoot growth in ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased return bloom in all cultivars except Packham’s Triumph.

Treatment
Girdlinge1
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except ‘Packham’s Triumph’e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased return bloom in all of the cultivars except ‘Packham’s Triumph’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Girdling only reduced shoot growth in ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–804 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar ranking for P-Ca sensitivity was Rosemarie above Flamingo, Early Bon Chretien and Packham’s Triumph, above Forelle.

Material
‘Rosemarie’e0
Outcome
sensitivitye1
Direction
higherinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Rosemarie’ > ‘Flamingo’ = ‘Early Bon Chretien’ = ‘Packham’s Triumph’ > ‘Forelle’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a marked difference in sensitivity towards different rates of P-Ca between the different cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–543 · show in text ↑

prohexadione-calcium · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

prohexadione-calcium · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.