Claim · model-written summary
Early spur ringing (ESR) significantly inhibited fruit growth in young pear trees.
- Taxon
- pear trees
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communise0 - Treatment
- ESRe1
- Outcome
- fruit growthe1
- Direction
- inhibitede1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“young pear trees”
e1“ESR and LSR significantly inhibited fruit growth”
Title
Effects of local source-sink manipulations on fruits and leaves of young pear trees
P.I. Garriz; G.M. Colavita; H.L. Alvarez Biologia Plantarum 1998. doi:10.1023/a:1001865021614
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Late spur ringing (LSR) significantly inhibited fruit growth in young pear trees.
- Intervention effect Early 15 % spur leaf area removal (ELAR) had little effect on fruit size in young pear trees.
- Intervention effect Late 15 % spur leaf area removal (LLAR) had little effect on fruit size in young pear trees.
- Mechanism The authors interpret that sink strength was demonstrated because the presence of the fruit caused an efficient transfer of photoassimilates.
- Mechanism The authors suggest that fruiting spurs were not fully autonomous in their carbon economy.
- Intervention effect Early spur ringing decreased specific leaf mass (SLM) by 23.84 % when measured 94 days after full bloom.
- Intervention effect Early spur leaf area removal (ELAR) did not significantly influence specific leaf mass.
- Intervention effect The treatments had no marked influence on fruit quality of young pear trees.