Abstract
An experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm of RGSC, Banaras Hindu University, Brakachha, Mirzapur during winter (rabi) season 2019. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications and a set of 10 treatments on Indian Mustard involving with three levels each of phosphorus (30, 50, 70 kg P2O5 ha-1) and lime (150, 300, 450 kg lime ha-1) with one control (no P2O5 and no lime). Indian Mustard cv. “Giriraj’ was sown on 16th November in 30 cm × 10 cm apart. Results stated that application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 increased the seed yield up to 11.9% and 8.7% as compared to 30 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 150 kg lime ha-1 respectively. Similarly, 70 kg P2O5 and 450 kg lime ha-1 showed increment in oil yield, biological yield, plant height, dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) over 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1. The results of yield and physical parameters obtained by the application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 have shown significant increment as compared to 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1 respectively but was mostly at par when compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 300 kg lime ha-1. It was also observed that the difference between 70 kg and 50 kg P2O5 for plant height and yield was found to be statistically at par and couldn’t meet the critical difference.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 increased Indian mustard seed yield by up to 11.9% compared with 30 kg P2O5 ha-1.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0 - Treatment
- 70 kg P2O5 ha-1e1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 11.9%e1
- Comparator
- 30 kg P2O5 ha-1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 increased the seed yield up to 11.9% and 8.7% as compared to 30 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 150 kg lime ha-1 respectively”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 450 kg lime ha-1 increased Indian mustard seed yield by up to 8.7% compared with 150 kg lime ha-1.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 450 kg lime ha-1e1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 8.7%e1
- Comparator
- 150 kg lime ha-1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 increased the seed yield up to 11.9% and 8.7% as compared to 30 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 150 kg lime ha-1 respectively”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
70 kg P2O5 increased oil yield, biological yield and plant height of Indian mustard over 30 kg P2O5.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 70 kg P2O5e2
- Outcome
- oil yield, biological yield, plant heighte2
- Direction
- incremente2
- Comparator
- 30 kg P2O5e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“70 kg P2O5 and 450 kg lime ha-1 showed increment in oil yield, biological yield, plant height, dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) over 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
70 kg P2O5 increased dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) of Indian mustard over 30 kg P2O5.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 70 kg P2O5e2
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK)e2
- Direction
- incremente2
- Comparator
- 30 kg P2O5e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“70 kg P2O5 and 450 kg lime ha-1 showed increment in oil yield, biological yield, plant height, dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) over 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
450 kg lime ha-1 increased oil yield, biological yield and plant height of Indian mustard over 150 kg lime.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 450 kg lime ha-1e2
- Outcome
- oil yield, biological yield, plant heighte2
- Direction
- incremente2
- Comparator
- 150 kg lime-1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“70 kg P2O5 and 450 kg lime ha-1 showed increment in oil yield, biological yield, plant height, dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) over 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
450 kg lime ha-1 increased dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) of Indian mustard over 150 kg lime.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 450 kg lime ha-1e2
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK)e2
- Direction
- incremente2
- Comparator
- 150 kg lime-1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“70 kg P2O5 and 450 kg lime ha-1 showed increment in oil yield, biological yield, plant height, dry matter accumulation, and nutrient uptake percentage (NPK) over 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and physical parameters were significantly increased by 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 compared with 30 kg P2O5.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 70 kg P2O5 ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yield and physical parameterse3
- Direction
- significant incremente3
- Comparator
- 30 kg P2O5e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“yield and physical parameters obtained by the application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 have shown significant increment as compared to 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1 respectively but was mostly at par when compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 300 kg lime ha-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and physical parameters were significantly increased by 450 kg lime ha-1 compared with 150 kg lime.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 450 kg lime ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yield and physical parameterse3
- Direction
- significant incremente3
- Comparator
- 150 kg lime-1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“yield and physical parameters obtained by the application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 have shown significant increment as compared to 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1 respectively but was mostly at par when compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 300 kg lime ha-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and physical parameters with 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 were mostly at par with 50 kg P2O5 ha-1.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 70 kg P2O5 ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yield and physical parameterse3
- Direction
- mostly at pare3
- Comparator
- 50 kg P2O5 ha-1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“yield and physical parameters obtained by the application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 have shown significant increment as compared to 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1 respectively but was mostly at par when compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 300 kg lime ha-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and physical parameters with 450 kg lime ha-1 were mostly at par with 300 kg lime ha-1.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 450 kg lime ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yield and physical parameterse3
- Direction
- mostly at pare3
- Comparator
- 300 kg lime ha-1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“yield and physical parameters obtained by the application of 70 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 450 kg lime ha-1 have shown significant increment as compared to 30 kg P2O5 and 150 kg lime-1 respectively but was mostly at par when compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 300 kg lime ha-1”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The difference between 70 kg and 50 kg P2O5 for plant height and yield was statistically at par and did not meet the critical difference.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 70 kge4
- Outcome
- plant height and yielde4
- Direction
- statistically at pare4
- Comparator
- 50 kg P2O5e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“the difference between 70 kg and 50 kg P2O5 for plant height and yield was found to be statistically at par and couldn’t meet the critical difference”
t0“Indian mustard”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →lime · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
lime · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
lime · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →phosphorus · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
30 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.