Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Growth, crop productivity, nutrient uptake, and soil fertility as influenced by different organic manures in green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

O.P. Meena; J.R. Jat; Pramendra Kumar; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Enhancing crop productivity while maintaining soil health remains a significant challenge in tropical agroecosystems, particularly in pulse-based systems such as green gram ( Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Excessive use of chemical fertilizers has led to long-term declines in soil fertility, highlighting the need for sustainable nutrient management approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various organic composts and cow-based formulations on soil health, root growth, nutrient uptake, and productivity of green gram. A two-year field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design with three replications. Main plot treatments included five organic manures: cow farmyard manure (FYM 5.0 t ha -1 ), cow dung compost (CDC 5.0 t ha -1 ), buffalo dung compost (BDC 5.0 t ha -1 ), goat dung compost (GDC 5.0 t ha -1 ), and goat dung compost (GDC 2.5 t ha -1 ). Sub-plot treatments comprised cow urine spray (CU5%), biodynamic manure BD-500 (75 g ha -1 soil spray), and BD-501 (2.5 g ha -1 plant spray). Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased seed and stover yields by 17.4% and 23.1%, respectively, over FYM, and improved soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and phosphorus, comparable to CDC. Higher GDC rates (5 t ha -1 ) outperformed the lower dose (2.5 t ha -1 ), with consistent benefits across both years. Cow-based bioformulations provided additional improvements but were secondary to the effects of compost. Higher rates (5.0 t ha -1 ) of goat or cow compost substantially enhance green gram productivity and key soil fertility indicators. • Goat dung compost 5 t ha -1 (GDC5) improved greengram height to 53.9 cm and pod number to 24.1, boosting yield. • Root nodules peaked with GDC5 at 32 plant -1 and dry weight 0.256 g, 25% above goat dung compost 2.5 t ha -1 (GDC2.5). • Seed yield rose 17–23% and stover yield 14–20% under GDC5 compared to FYM5 control. • Soil fertility improved with GDC5, recording SOC 0.251% and N 174 kg ha -1 post-harvest. • Fresh cow urine 5% (CU5%) spray enhanced nutrient uptake, raising seed N to 28.5 kg ha -1 and P to 4.05 kg ha -1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased seed yield by 17.4% over FYM in green gram.

Organ / stage
seede1
Treatment
Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1e1
Outcome
seed and stover yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17.4%e1
Comparator
FYMe1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“A two-year field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design with three replications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased seed and stover yields by 17.4% and 23.1%, respectively, over FYM, and improved soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and phosphorus, comparable to CDC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased stover yield by 23.1% over FYM in green gram.

Organ / stage
stovere1
Treatment
Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1e1
Outcome
seed and stover yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
23.1%e1
Comparator
FYMe1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“A two-year field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design with three replications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased seed and stover yields by 17.4% and 23.1%, respectively, over FYM, and improved soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and phosphorus, comparable to CDC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 improved soil organic carbon, available nitrogen and phosphorus, comparable to cow dung compost.

Treatment
Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1e1
Outcome
soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and phosphoruse1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
comparable to CDCe1
Comparator
CDCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of GDC at 5 t ha -1 significantly increased seed and stover yields by 17.4% and 23.1%, respectively, over FYM, and improved soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, and phosphorus, comparable to CDC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher goat dung compost rate (5 t ha -1) outperformed the lower dose (2.5 t ha -1) in green gram, with consistent benefits across both years.

Treatment
Higher GDC rates (5 t ha -1 )e2
Outcome
outperformede2
Direction
outperformede2
Qualifier
consistent benefits across both yearse2
Comparator
lower dose (2.5 t ha -1 )e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher GDC rates (5 t ha -1 ) outperformed the lower dose (2.5 t ha -1 ), with consistent benefits across both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow-based bioformulations gave additional improvements in green gram, secondary to the effects of compost.

Treatment
Cow-based bioformulationse3
Outcome
additional improvementse3
Direction
secondarye3
Comparator
composte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cow-based bioformulations provided additional improvements but were secondary to the effects of compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 improved green gram height to 53.9 cm.

Treatment
Goat dung compost 5 t ha -1 (GDC5)e4
Outcome
heighte4
Direction
improvede4
Value
53.9 cme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e4

“Goat dung compost 5 t ha -1 (GDC5) improved greengram height to 53.9 cm and pod number to 24.1, boosting yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 improved green gram pod number to 24.1.

Treatment
Goat dung compost 5 t ha -1 (GDC5)e4
Outcome
pod numbere4
Direction
improvede4
Value
24.1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e4

“Goat dung compost 5 t ha -1 (GDC5) improved greengram height to 53.9 cm and pod number to 24.1, boosting yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 gave peak root nodule number of 32 per plant in green gram.

Organ / stage
Roote5
Treatment
GDC5e5
Outcome
Root nodulese5
Direction
peakede5
Value
32 plant -1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e5

“Root nodules peaked with GDC5 at 32 plant -1 and dry weight 0.256 g, 25% above goat dung compost 2.5 t ha -1 (GDC2.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nodule dry weight in green gram was 0.256 g under GDC5, 25% above goat dung compost 2.5 t ha -1.

Treatment
GDC5e5
Outcome
dry weighte5
Direction
abovee5
Value
0.256 ge5
Qualifier
25%e5
Comparator
goat dung compost 2.5 t ha -1 (GDC2.5)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e5

“Root nodules peaked with GDC5 at 32 plant -1 and dry weight 0.256 g, 25% above goat dung compost 2.5 t ha -1 (GDC2.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 raised soil organic carbon to 0.251% in green gram fields.

Treatment
GDC5e6
Outcome
SOCe6
Direction
improvede6
Value
0.251%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil fertility improved with GDC5, recording SOC 0.251% and N 174 kg ha -1 post-harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat dung compost at 5 t ha -1 gave post-harvest soil N of 174 kg ha -1 in green gram fields.

Treatment
GDC5e6
Outcome
Ne6
Direction
improvede6
Value
174 kg ha -1e6
Qualifier
post-harveste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil fertility improved with GDC5, recording SOC 0.251% and N 174 kg ha -1 post-harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh cow urine 5% spray enhanced nutrient uptake in green gram, raising seed N to 28.5 kg ha -1.

Organ / stage
seede7
Treatment
Fresh cow urine 5% (CU5%) spraye7
Outcome
nutrient uptakee7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
28.5 kg ha -1e7
Qualifier
seed Ne7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fresh cow urine 5% (CU5%) spray enhanced nutrient uptake, raising seed N to 28.5 kg ha -1 and P to 4.05 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh cow urine 5% spray enhanced nutrient uptake in green gram, raising seed P to 4.05 kg ha -1.

Organ / stage
seede7
Treatment
Fresh cow urine 5% (CU5%) spraye7
Outcome
nutrient uptakee7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
4.05 kg ha -1e7
Qualifier
Pe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fresh cow urine 5% (CU5%) spray enhanced nutrient uptake, raising seed N to 28.5 kg ha -1 and P to 4.05 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2111 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.