Paper · 2025 · PLoS ONE

Exploring the potential of microbial inoculant to enhance common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L:) yield via increased root nodulation and soil macro-nutrients

Sien Tigah Fortu; Aaron Suh Tening; Solange Takwi Ndzeshala; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil fertility constraints for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production are often resolved using chemical fertilizers, but microbial inoculants can be used as a sustainable option/complement. Microbial inoculant formulation was tested on common bean in a randomized-complete-block-design field experiment with eight treatments and four replicates. The treatments included no input(control), chemical fertilizer(NPK), poultry manure(PM), Microbial inoculants(MI), NPK + PM, NPK + MI, PM + MI, and NPK + PM + MI. Microbial inoculant treatment had the highest fertilizer replacement value (proportion of chemical fertilizer that an alternative input can substitute) relative to poultry manure(41.6%) and chemical fertilizer(26.7%). The highest bean yield(3.46 tons ha-1) that was observed in the NPK + PM + MI treatment was significantly (P < 0.001) different from the microbial inoculant treatment(1.71 tons ha-1) and the control(1.42 tons ha-1). The highest 1000-grain weight (494 g) that occurred in NPK + PM + MI inoculant treatment was significantly (P < 0.05) different from the MI(457 g), NPK(448 g), PM(436 g), and control(421 g) treatments. Effective root nodules correlated positively (P < 0.05) with bean yield (r = 0.77) and 1000-grain weight (r = 0.90). Application of NPK + PM + MI had higher nodule number (9) and effectiveness than the control (2). Soil pH (6.6) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in NPK + PM + MI than MI + PM (6.5), control (5.5) and NPK (5.0). Soil nitrogen and available phosphorus increased significantly (P < 0.05) in NPK + PM + MI 0.25% and 8.68 mg/kg, respectively, than the control(0.13% and 6.31 mg/kg), while higher potassium(2.80 cmol/kg) occurred in NPK than control(1.70 cmol/kg). These findings highlight the potential to explore the ability of bio-inoculant to boost root nodulation, enhance soil macro-nutrients, and modulate soil pH in bean production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculant had 41.6% fertilizer replacement value relative to poultry manure.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Microbial inoculant treatmente0
Outcome
fertilizer replacement valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.6%e0
Comparator
poultry manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculant treatment had the highest fertilizer replacement value (proportion of chemical fertilizer that an alternative input can substitute) relative to poultry manure(41.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculant had 26.7% fertilizer replacement value relative to chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
fertilizer replacement valuee1
Value
26.7%e0
Comparator
chemical fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative to poultry manure(41.6%) and chemical fertilizer(26.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Microbial inoculant treatment had the highest fertilizer replacement value (proportion of chemical fertilizer that an alternative input can substitute) relative to poultry manure(41.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK, poultry manure, and microbial inoculant together produced 3.46 tons ha-1 bean yield, significantly above microbial inoculant alone.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.46 tons ha-1e0
Qualifier
1.71 tons ha-1e0
Comparator
microbial inoculant treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest bean yield(3.46 tons ha-1) that was observed in the NPK + PM + MI treatment was significantly (P < 0.001) different from the microbial inoculant treatment(1.71 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK, poultry manure, and microbial inoculant together yielded more beans than control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.46 tons ha-1e0
Qualifier
1.42 tons ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest bean yield(3.46 tons ha-1) that was observed in the NPK + PM + MI treatment was significantly (P < 0.001) different from the microbial inoculant treatment(1.71 tons ha-1) and the control(1.42 tons ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined input had the highest 1000-grain weight, 494 g, above MI, NPK, PM, and control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
494 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest 1000-grain weight (494 g) that occurred in NPK + PM + MI inoculant treatment was significantly (P < 0.05) different from the MI(457 g), NPK(448 g), PM(436 g), and control(421 g) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective root nodules correlated positively with bean yield, r = 0.77.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Organ / stage
root nodulese0
Outcome
bean yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Value
r = 0.77e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective root nodules correlated positively (P < 0.05) with bean yield (r = 0.77)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective root nodules correlated positively with 1000-grain weight, r = 0.90.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Organ / stage
root nodulese0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
positivelye0
Value
r = 0.90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective root nodules correlated positively (P < 0.05) with bean yield (r = 0.77) and 1000-grain weight (r = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inputs produced nine nodules versus two under control, with greater effectiveness.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
highere0
Value
9e0
Qualifier
2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NPK + PM + MI had higher nodule number (9) and effectiveness than the control (2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inputs raised soil pH to 6.6 relative to MI plus PM, control, and NPK.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
Soil pHe0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.6e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH (6.6) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in NPK + PM + MI than MI + PM (6.5), control (5.5) and NPK (5.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inputs significantly increased soil nitrogen to 0.25% from 0.13% under control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
Soil nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.25%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil nitrogen and available phosphorus increased significantly (P < 0.05) in NPK + PM + MI 0.25% and 8.68 mg/kg, respectively, than the control(0.13% and 6.31 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inputs significantly increased available phosphorus to 8.68 mg/kg.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPK + PM + MIe0
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.68 mg/kge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil nitrogen and available phosphorus increased significantly (P < 0.05) in NPK + PM + MI 0.25% and 8.68 mg/kg, respectively, than the control(0.13% and 6.31 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK raised soil potassium to 2.80 cmol/kg versus 1.70 under control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.80 cmol/kge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher potassium(2.80 cmol/kg) occurred in NPK than control(1.70 cmol/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

35 papers: 20 positive, 15 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 52 positive, 13 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.