Paper · 2025 · PeerJ

Physiochemical screening of road avenue plants in better landscape management of highly polluted urbanized city (Lahore), Pakistan

Bushra Munam; Sohaib Muhammad; Muhammad Tayyab; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lahore has been consistently ranked as the world’s most polluted city. Because of combative ideas to construct highways, underpasses and flyovers, Lahore had lost a remarkable percentage of its tree cover over the past 15 years. The present study focuses on the outcomes of rapidly increasing air pollution on roadside vegetation. In current study, species such as Alstonia scholaris L. , Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd., Dalbergia sissoo Roxb . Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus virens Aiton, Ficus benjamina L. , Ficus religiosa Linn. , Morus alba L. , Murraya paniculata L ., Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., Polyalthia longifolia Sonn., Rubia tinctorum L. found on the seven busiest roads of Lahore were selected (on the basis of traffic densities) for biomonitoring. These plants were selected due to their prevalence and commonly occurrence on these selected roads. Variation on biochemical parameters like chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll content & carotenoids and physiological parameters like stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate were found in triplicate. By analyzing these parameters quality of air and health of plants can also be assessed. In this study the dust load was maximum on the leaves of Alstonia scholaris L. (0.02 ± 0.005), Ficus religiosa Linn. (0.02 ± 0.003), and Morus alba L . (0.02 ± 0.003) Reduction in chlorophyll was noticed in Alstonia scholaris L. (0.44 ± 0.22) and Polyalthia longiflia Sonn. (0.41 ± 0.22) while the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16), followed by Ficus benjamina L . (0.80 ± 0.25), Ficus religiosa Linn . (0.81 ± 0.30), Ficus virens Aiton . (0.64 ± 0.22), Morus alba L. (1.80 ± 0.27) and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall . (2.55 ± 0.43), was higher at polluted sites . The reduction in carotenoid content was found in Murraya paniculata L. (4.12 ± 2.18) while it was highest in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (9.12 ± 0.71) Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of Alstonia scholaris L . (25.36 ± 13.10), Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. (34.37 ± 19.92), Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. (28.23 ± 11.25), Murraya paniculata L. (26.80 ± 7.75), Polyalthia longifolia Sonn. (42.27 ± 22.87), and Rubia tinctorum L. (30.60 ± 4.07) was observed. The current research distinctly signifies Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus benjamina L., Ficus religiosa Linn., Ficus virens Aiton., Morus alba L. and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., have capability to hold on the stress triggered by roadside pollutants. The findings are useful to urban green space landscapers in harsh climates as they choose appropriate species that can offer a variety of ecosystem services, such as resistance to air pollution and lowering of temperature without compromising plant survival.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust load was maximum on the leaves of Alstonia scholaris.

Taxon
Alstonia scholarisAlstonia scholarise1
Outcome
dust loade0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.02 ± 0.005e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alstonia scholaris
Alstonia scholaris · TaxonWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dust load was maximum on the leaves of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alstonia scholaris L. (0.02 ± 0.005)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust load was maximum on the leaves of Ficus religiosa.

Taxon
Ficus religiosaFicus religiosae1
Outcome
dust loade0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.02 ± 0.003e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus religiosa
Ficus religiosa · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dust load was maximum on the leaves of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus religiosa Linn. (0.02 ± 0.003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1313 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust load was maximum on the leaves of Morus alba.

Taxon
Morus albaMorus albae1
Outcome
dust loade0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.02 ± 0.003e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dust load was maximum on the leaves of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Morus alba L . (0.02 ± 0.003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll was reduced in Alstonia scholaris (0.44 ± 0.22).

Taxon
Alstonia scholarisAlstonia scholarise0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.44 ± 0.22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alstonia scholaris
Alstonia scholaris · TaxonWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in chlorophyll was noticed in Alstonia scholaris L. (0.44 ± 0.22) and Polyalthia longiflia Sonn. (0.41 ± 0.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll was reduced in Polyalthia longiflia (0.41 ± 0.22).

Taxon
Polyalthia longiflia Sonn.e0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.41 ± 0.22e0

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in chlorophyll was noticed in Alstonia scholaris L. (0.44 ± 0.22) and Polyalthia longiflia Sonn. (0.41 ± 0.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Eucalyptus globulus (0.71 ± 0.16).

Taxon
Eucalyptus globulusEucalyptus globuluse0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
0.71 ± 0.16e0
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus · TaxonMurray Fagg · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Ficus benjamina (0.80 ± 0.25).

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
0.80 ± 0.25e1
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina L . (0.80 ± 0.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1597 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Ficus religiosa (0.81 ± 0.30).

Taxon
Ficus religiosaFicus religiosae1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
0.81 ± 0.30e1
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus religiosa
Ficus religiosa · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus religiosa Linn . (0.81 ± 0.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1635 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Ficus virens (0.64 ± 0.22).

Taxon
Ficus virensFicus virense1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
0.64 ± 0.22e1
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus virens
Ficus virens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus virens Aiton . (0.64 ± 0.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1671 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Morus alba (1.80 ± 0.27).

Taxon
Morus albaMorus albae1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
1.80 ± 0.27e1
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Morus alba L. (1.80 ± 0.27)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1700 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher at polluted sites in Putranjiva roxburghii (2.55 ± 0.43).

Taxon
Putranjiva roxburghiiPutranjiva roxburghiie1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere2
Value
2.55 ± 0.43e1
Setting
polluted sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Putranjiva roxburghii
Putranjiva roxburghii · TaxonHatem Moushir · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentration of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (0.71 ± 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Putranjiva roxburghii Wall . (2.55 ± 0.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1747 · show in text ↑
e2

“was higher at polluted sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content was reduced in Murraya paniculata (4.12 ± 2.18).

Taxon
Murraya paniculataMurraya paniculatae0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4.12 ± 2.18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Murraya paniculata
Murraya paniculata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in carotenoid content was found in Murraya paniculata L. (4.12 ± 2.18) while it was highest in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (9.12 ± 0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content was highest in Eucalyptus globulus (9.12 ± 0.71).

Taxon
Eucalyptus globulusEucalyptus globuluse0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.12 ± 0.71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus · TaxonMurray Fagg · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in carotenoid content was found in Murraya paniculata L. (4.12 ± 2.18) while it was highest in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (9.12 ± 0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Alstonia scholaris (25.36 ± 13.10).

Taxon
Alstonia scholarisAlstonia scholarise1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
25.36 ± 13.10e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alstonia scholaris
Alstonia scholaris · TaxonWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alstonia scholaris L . (25.36 ± 13.10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2035 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Bougainvillea spectabilis (34.37 ± 19.92).

Taxon
Bougainvillea spectabilisBougainvillea spectabilise1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
34.37 ± 19.92e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bougainvillea spectabilis
Bougainvillea spectabilis · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. (34.37 ± 19.92)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Dalbergia sissoo (28.23 ± 11.25).

Taxon
Dalbergia sissooDalbergia sissooe1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
28.23 ± 11.25e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dalbergia sissoo
Dalbergia sissoo · Taxon5ezez8 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. (28.23 ± 11.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Murraya paniculata (26.80 ± 7.75).

Taxon
Murraya paniculataMurraya paniculatae1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
26.80 ± 7.75e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Murraya paniculata
Murraya paniculata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Murraya paniculata L. (26.80 ± 7.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Polyalthia longifolia (42.27 ± 22.87).

Taxon
Polyalthia longifoliaMonoon longifoliume1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
42.27 ± 22.87e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monoon longifolium
Monoon longifolium · TaxonOriginal uploader was Omoo at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Polyalthia longifolia Sonn. (42.27 ± 22.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate under pollution stress was changed in Rubia tinctorum (30.60 ± 4.07).

Taxon
Rubia tinctorumRubia tinctorume1
Treatment
pollution stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
30.60 ± 4.07e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubia tinctorum
Rubia tinctorum · TaxonCarstor · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the pollution stress the changes in photosynthetic rate of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rubia tinctorum L. (30.60 ± 4.07)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2247 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six roadside species (Eucalyptus globulus, Ficus benjamina, Ficus religiosa, Ficus virens, Morus alba and Putranjiva roxburghii) have capability to hold on to roadside-pollutant stress.

Taxon
Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus benjamina L., Ficus religiosa Linn., Ficus virens Aiton., Morus alba L. and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall.Morus albaPutranjiva roxburghiiEucalyptus globulusFicus religiosaFicus virensFicus benjaminae0
Outcome
capability to hold on the stresse0
Qualifier
triggered by roadside pollutantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Putranjiva roxburghii
Putranjiva roxburghii · TaxonHatem Moushir · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus · TaxonMurray Fagg · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ficus religiosa
Ficus religiosa · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The current research distinctly signifies Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Ficus benjamina L., Ficus religiosa Linn., Ficus virens Aiton., Morus alba L. and Putranjiva roxburghii Wall., have capability to hold on the stress triggered by roadside pollutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2262–2514 · show in text ↑