Paper · 2025 · Pest Management Science

A novel nematicide application method based on nematode life cycle for managing root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita

Denis Gitonga; Abolfazl Hajihassani

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organic vegetable growers face significant challenges in managing plant-parasitic nematodes, particularly root-knot nematodes (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.), because of restrictions on the use of synthetic chemicals. This study evaluated the efficacy of seven commercially available Organic Materials Review Institute-certified bionematicides against Meloidogyne incognita under greenhouse and field conditions. A cucumber plasticulture field study was also conducted to compare the efficacy of four best-performing bionematicides, including azadirachtin, cold-pressed neem oil, thyme oil and saponins of Quillaja saponaria, identified in the greenhouse study and a chemical nematicde (oxamyl) using two application regimes: calendar-based (following the product label) and nematode life-cycle-based (following the M. incognita life cycle using degree-days assessment). RESULTS: In the greenhouse study with tomato, azadirachtin and thyme oil significantly reduced M. incognita root galling and reproduction factor (final nematode population/initial nematode population) compared with a positive control. In the field trial with cucumber, the nematode life cycle was completed in 23 days during the spring season and 24 days during the fall season, accumulating 380 and 398 degree-days, respectively, above a base temperature of 10 °C. For calendar-based applications, only azadirachtin significantly reduced nematode density, whereas for life-cycle-based applications, all treatments except saponins of Q. saponaria were effective. Oxamyl was more effective when applied according to the nematode life cycle than on a calendar-based regime. Life-cycle-based applications generally outperformed calendar-based applications based on numerical values, even in cases in which the differences were not significant. For the galling index, calendar-based applications of azadirachtin and cold-pressed neem oil reduced the galling index more than life-cycle-based applications at mid-season. At the end of the season, only azadirachtin under the calendar-based application differed significantly from the control, while all other treatments (except saponins of Q. saponaria) had lower root galling indices than the calendar-based applications. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that both application regimes can be used to manage M. incognita in organic farming systems. Of particular significance is the novel life-cycle-based approach developed in this study, which may confer enhanced sustainability benefits by optimizing nematicide application timing and reducing treatment frequency, ultimately leading to a decline in soil nematode population densities. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin reduced tomato root galling and nematode reproduction factor in the greenhouse.

Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita root galling and reproduction factore0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
positive controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse study with tomato, azadirachtin and thyme oil significantly reduced M. incognita root galling and reproduction factor (final nematode population/initial nematode population) compared with a positive control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thyme oil reduced tomato root galling and nematode reproduction factor in the greenhouse.

Treatment
thyme oile0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita root galling and reproduction factore0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
positive controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse study with tomato, azadirachtin and thyme oil significantly reduced M. incognita root galling and reproduction factor (final nematode population/initial nematode population) compared with a positive control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cucumber-field nematode life cycle lasted 23 days and accumulated 380 degree-days in spring.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Outcome
nematode life cyclee0
Value
23 dayse0
Qualifier
380e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nematode life cycle was completed in 23 days during the spring season and 24 days during the fall season, accumulating 380 and 398 degree-days, respectively, above a base temperature of 10 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1339 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cucumber-field nematode life cycle lasted 24 days and accumulated 398 degree-days in fall.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Outcome
nematode life cyclee0
Value
24 dayse0
Qualifier
398 degree-dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nematode life cycle was completed in 23 days during the spring season and 24 days during the fall season, accumulating 380 and 398 degree-days, respectively, above a base temperature of 10 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1339 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only calendar-applied azadirachtin significantly reduced cucumber-field nematode density.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Outcome
nematode densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
calendar-based applicationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For calendar-based applications, only azadirachtin significantly reduced nematode density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1430 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Life-cycle applications were effective for all treatments other than Quillaja saponaria saponins.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
life-cycle-based applicationse0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
except saponins of Q. saponariae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for life-cycle-based applications, all treatments except saponins of Q. saponaria were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1536 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxamyl worked better with life-cycle timing than calendar timing.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
Oxamyle0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
calendar-based regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oxamyl was more effective when applied according to the nematode life cycle than on a calendar-based regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1645 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Life-cycle applications generally numerically outperformed calendar applications, though some differences were not significant.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
Life-cycle-based applicationse0
Outcome
outperformede0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
calendar-based applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Life-cycle-based applications generally outperformed calendar-based applications based on numerical values, even in cases in which the differences were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1814 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At mid-season calendar-applied azadirachtin reduced galling index more than life-cycle application.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Outcome
galling indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
life-cycle-based applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calendar-based applications of azadirachtin and cold-pressed neem oil reduced the galling index more than life-cycle-based applications at mid-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1988 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At mid-season calendar-applied neem oil reduced galling index more than life-cycle application.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
cold-pressed neem oile0
Outcome
galling indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
life-cycle-based applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calendar-based applications of azadirachtin and cold-pressed neem oil reduced the galling index more than life-cycle-based applications at mid-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1988 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At season end only calendar-applied azadirachtin differed significantly from control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Outcome
differed significantlye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only azadirachtin under the calendar-based application differed significantly from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2110 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At season end other treatments except Quillaja saponaria saponins had lower galling indices than calendar applications.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
all other treatmentse0
Outcome
root galling indicese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
calendar-based applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all other treatments (except saponins of Q. saponaria) had lower root galling indices than the calendar-based applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2240 · show in text ↑
e7

“A cucumber plasticulture field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–453 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.