Abstract
Although chemical fertilizers provide essential nutrients, prolonged use of inorganic fertilizers not only deteriorates soil health but also damages crop yield.However, application of organic amendments like compost and plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) along with chemical fertilizers is considered as a sustainable approach for improving nutrient availability in soil-plant systems.A pot experiment was carried out according to completely randomized design (CRD) to assess their impact on pea (Pisum sativum L.) growth and yield.Following treatments: control, 100% NPK, 100% compost, 50% NPK + 50% compost both with and without PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation were established with four replications of each.The results revealed that plant growth and yield were highest in treatment T4 when PGPR-inoculated plants were subjected to 50% NPK + 50% compost.Organic amendment like 100% compost in conjunction with PGPR inoculation resulted in the maximum root nodulation (54.50 root nodules pot -1 ) and bacterial population (8x10 5 CFU g -1 fresh soil).By contrast, 100% compost and PGPR did not result in the maximum nutrient availability in soil-plant system as compared to inoculated 50% compost + 50% NPK.In conclusion, integration of 50% compost, 50% NPK and PGPR inoculation enhanced pea yield by 22.56% when compared with 100% NPK alone.Moreover, integrated approach like PGPR + 50% compost + 50% NPK enhanced pea yield by reducing NPK inputs up to 50%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Pea plant growth was highest with 50% NPK plus 50% compost and PGPR.
- Taxon
- PEA
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- 50% NPK + 50% composte0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant growth and yield were highest in treatment T4 when PGPR-inoculated plants were subjected to 50% NPK + 50% compost”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea yield was highest with 50% NPK plus 50% compost and PGPR.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- 50% NPK + 50% composte0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant growth and yield were highest in treatment T4 when PGPR-inoculated plants were subjected to 50% NPK + 50% compost”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost and PGPR produced maximum pea root nodulation at 54.50 nodules per pot.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- 100% compost in conjunction with PGPR inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- root nodulatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 54.50 root nodules pot -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“100% compost in conjunction with PGPR inoculation resulted in the maximum root nodulation (54.50 root nodules pot -1 )”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost and PGPR produced a maximum soil bacterial population of 8x10 5 CFU g -1 fresh soil.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- 100% compost in conjunction with PGPR inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- bacterial populatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 8x10 5 CFU g -1 fresh soile0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“100% compost in conjunction with PGPR inoculation resulted in the maximum root nodulation (54.50 root nodules pot -1 ) and bacterial population (8x10 5 CFU g -1 fresh soil)”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost plus PGPR gave less soil plant nutrient availability than inoculated 50% compost plus 50% NPK.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- 100% compost and PGPRe0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient availability in soil-plant systeme0
- Direction
- did not result in the maximume0
- Comparator
- inoculated 50% compost + 50% NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“100% compost and PGPR did not result in the maximum nutrient availability in soil-plant system as compared to inoculated 50% compost + 50% NPK”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated compost, NPK and PGPR increased pea yield by 22.56% versus NPK alone.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 50% compost, 50% NPK and PGPR inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilus RP-01e1symbiont
- Outcome
- pea yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 22.56%e0
- Comparator
- 100% NPK alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“integration of 50% compost, 50% NPK and PGPR inoculation enhanced pea yield by 22.56% when compared with 100% NPK alone”
e1“PGPR (Bacillus subtilus RP-01) inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
The integrated treatment increased pea yield while reducing NPK inputs up to 50%.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- PGPR + 50% compost + 50% NPKe0
- Outcome
- reducing NPK inputs up to 50%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PGPR + 50% compost + 50% NPK enhanced pea yield by reducing NPK inputs up to 50%”
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →fertilization · soil: biology · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.