Paper · 2025 · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Effects of fungicide application timing on foliar fungal diseases, Fusarium head blight and economic returns in two winter wheat cultivars

Mahnoor Asif; Stephen N. Wegulo; Katherine Frels; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant). Metconazole + prothioconazole (Sphaerex) and picoxystrobin (Aproach) were applied once, twice, or three times during growth stages BBCH 31, BBCH 39, or BBCH 60. Disease levels were low in both years. Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON) were higher (p = 0.05) in Wesley than in Zenda. Applications at BBCH 39 and BBCH 60 reduced foliar disease severity. Due to low FHB levels, there were no differences among treatments in FHB index, FDK and DON. Yield did not differ among treatments in Zenda. In Wesley, yield in untreated plots was lower (p = 0.05) than in fungicide-treated plots. Applications in Zenda were unprofitable, with net returns ranging from ‒$469 ha‒1 to $92 ha‒1. In Wesley, net returns were positive in 93% of the treatments and ranged from ‒$269 ha‒1 to $329 ha‒1. Single applications were more profitable than multiple applications. These results suggest that a single fungicide application on a susceptible winter wheat cultivar at BBCH 39 or BBCH 60 can effectively and economically control foliar fungal diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium-damaged kernels and deoxynivalenol were higher in susceptible Wesley than in Zenda

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Wesleye1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Zendae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON) were higher (p = 0.05) in Wesley than in Zenda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applications at BBCH 39 and BBCH 60 reduced foliar disease severity in winter wheat

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Applications at BBCH 39 and BBCH 60e2
Outcome
foliar disease severitye2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
Field experiments in 2022 and 2024e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applications at BBCH 39 and BBCH 60 reduced foliar disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments did not differ in FHB index, FDK or DON under low FHB levels

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Metconazole + prothioconazole (Sphaerex) and picoxystrobin (Aproach)e3
Outcome
FHB index, FDK and DONe4
Direction
no differencese4
Qualifier
Due to low FHB levelse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“Metconazole + prothioconazole (Sphaerex) and picoxystrobin (Aproach) were applied once, twice, or three times during growth stages BBCH 31, BBCH 39, or BBCH 60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–380 · show in text ↑
e4

“Due to low FHB levels, there were no differences among treatments in FHB index, FDK and DON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–685 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ among fungicide treatments in Zenda

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Zendae5
Outcome
Yielde5
Direction
did not differe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yield did not differ among treatments in Zenda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in untreated plots was lower than in fungicide-treated plots of susceptible Wesley

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Wesleye6
Treatment
fungicidee6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
untreated plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e6

“In Wesley, yield in untreated plots was lower (p = 0.05) than in fungicide-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applications in Zenda were unprofitable, with net returns from -$469 to $92 per hectare

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Zendae7
Outcome
net returnse7
Value
‒$469 ha‒1 to $92 ha‒1e7
Qualifier
unprofitablee7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e7

“Applications in Zenda were unprofitable, with net returns ranging from ‒$469 ha‒1 to $92 ha‒1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–918 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns in Wesley were positive in 93% of the fungicide treatments

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Wesleye1
Outcome
net returnse1
Value
93%e1
Qualifier
positive in 93% of the treatmentse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Wesley, net returns were positive in 93% of the treatments and ranged from ‒$269 ha‒1 to $329 ha‒1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1021 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns in Wesley ranged from -$269 to $329 per hectare

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Wesleye1
Outcome
net returnse1
Value
‒$269 ha‒1 to $329 ha‒1e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Wesley, net returns were positive in 93% of the treatments and ranged from ‒$269 ha‒1 to $329 ha‒1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single fungicide applications were more profitable than multiple applications in winter wheat

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Single applicationse1
Outcome
profitablee1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
multiple applicationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments in 2022 and 2024 evaluated fungicide applications and timing on foliar fungal diseases and Fusarium head blight (FHB) in the winter wheat cultivars Wesley (susceptible) and Zenda (moderately resistant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single applications were more profitable than multiple applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1090 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A single fungicide application on a susceptible winter wheat cultivar at BBCH 39 or BBCH 60 can effectively and economically control foliar fungal diseases

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
single fungicide applicatione1
Outcome
control foliar fungal diseasese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results suggest that a single fungicide application on a susceptible winter wheat cultivar at BBCH 39 or BBCH 60 can effectively and economically control foliar fungal diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1274 · show in text ↑

metconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

prothioconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

picoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.