Paper · 2018 · Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)

Efficacy of Seed Treatments, Microbial and Biochemical Pesticides for Managing Early Tan Spot and Stripe Rust Diseases of Wheat

Collins Bugingo

19
claims
51
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat is a major cereal crop in the U.S.A and in the world. However, its production is hampered by a number of factors both biotic and abiotic. Foliar diseases like tan spot caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and stripe rust caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, are economically important diseases causing over 5-55 % yield loss. To assess the efficacy of fungicide seed treatments in the management of early tan spot, two hard red spring wheat cultivars “Select” and “Brick” were treated with seedapplied commercially available combo fungicides metalaxyl + pyraclostrobin + triticonazole and difenoconazole + mefenoxam + sedaxane + thiomexotham. A nontreated check consisting of naked seed for both cultivars was included. The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP). Disease severity, lesion size, and number of lesions ratings were taken from inoculated plants at 7 and 14 days after inoculation (DAI) for each inoculation period. To evaluate the efficacy of fungicide seed treatments on stripe rust, two hard red winter wheat cultivars “Expedition” (moderately susceptible) and “Alice” (susceptible) to stripe rust were seed treated with two commercial fungicides pyraclostrobin, and difenoconazole + mefenoxam and planted in cones and then transferred to a growth chamber at 10°C. A non-treated seed check was included for comparison. The plants were inoculated with Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici obtained from a wheat field near Brookings the previous season. Ratings for stripe rust severity were done at 20 days after inoculation for the plants inoculated at 2 weeks after planting. To test the effect of seed treatment on early tan spot development under field conditions, field trials were conducted from the South Dakota State University (SDSU) Northeast Research Farm near South shore in Watertown and at SDSU Volga Research Farm with seed treatments having active ingredients; prothioconazole+ penflufen+ metalaxyl; sedaxane; pyraclostrobin; metalaxyl + ipconazole; difenoconazole + mefenoxam and the untreated seeds as the check. Results from the greenhouse seed treatment control of early tan spot development indicated a significant difference among seed treatments with a low tan spot severity in the treated plants. Untreated plants for both cultivars had the highest percentage disease severity ranging from 50- 70 %, large lesions (0.5-0.6 centimeters) and high lesion counts (30-40) at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after planting compared to the treated pots that had significantly low percentage disease severity, lesion numbers, and lesion size. Similarly, significantly lower tan spot severity was observed in the seed treated plots compared to non-treated in the field trial at both locations. Plots with fungicide seed treatments had higher numbers of plants/m2 compared to the non-treated. Winter survival was significantly high in the treated plots than the untreated for both locations. Likewise, there was significantly a higher grain yield for plots treated with fungicides than the untreated plots. To assess the efficacy of the biochemical and microbial pesticides, a hard red spring wheat cultivar “Select” was planted in the cone-tainers. The 3 and 6 weeks old seedlings were pre-treated with products containing active ingredients Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 108, hydrogen peroxide + peroxyacetic acid and azadirachtin. Pyraclostrobin acted as a positive control. All greenhouse plants were then inoculated with Ptr three days after initial product application at three and six weeks after planting. The same treatments were used in a field setting and a split-plot design was used for two separate fields, namely; the organic and conventional plots at the Southeast Research Farm. Results from the greenhouse and field study showed significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse with low tan spot severities in cones treated with pyraclostrobin, Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108. Plant vigor was also significantly increased in terms of greenness with the treated plots having higher green ratings than the untreated. Azadirachtin was not significant at managing the tan spot disease or improving the plant greenness. Likewise, yield was significantly high in plots treated with microbial pesticides than in the control/untreated plots. In a study to establish the sensitivity of Pyrenphora tritici repentis to fungicides, ninety isolates collected from North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Kansas were tested for sensitivity using both spore and mycelia assays on picoxystrobin, prothioconazole + tebuconazole and azoxystrobin + propiconazole. From the mycelia assays, thirty out of the ninety isolates tested in microtiter plate assays showed insensitivity to picoxystrobin half and full rates with and without Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM). Further assessments of the five Ptr isolates involving spores showed germination of all isolates on all fungicides with picoxystrobin having the highest percentage spore germination. The double rate of the fungicides had the least germination percentage for all the isolates tested. Spore germination was nullified when the fungicide picoxystrobin was amended with Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) and no spore germination was recorded meaning all the isolates were sensitive to the fungicides and the prior registered insensitivity was a result Ptr evading the cytochrome b site of QoI action in the absence of SHAM. The findings of this study could be an important source of information for growers and the industry in making wheat production more profitable by informed tan spot and stripe rust management decisions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments significantly lowered tan spot disease severity in greenhouse-grown wheat cultivars Select and Brick compared with untreated plants.

Material
Selecte0
Treatment
seedapplied commercially available combo fungicidese0
Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise3pathogen
Outcome
percentage disease severitye1
Direction
significantly lowe2
Comparator
Untreated plantse1
Setting
greenhousee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hard red spring wheat cultivars “Select” and “Brick” were treated with seedapplied commercially available combo fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–559 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated plants for both cultivars had the highest percentage disease severity ranging from 50- 70 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2356–2457 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to the treated pots that had significantly low percentage disease severity, lesion numbers, and lesion size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2564–2680 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments significantly lowered lesion numbers and lesion size in greenhouse-grown wheat compared with untreated plants.

Treatment
seedapplied commercially available combo fungicidese0
Outcome
lesion numbers, and lesion sizee2
Direction
significantly lowe2
Comparator
Untreated plantse1
Setting
greenhousee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hard red spring wheat cultivars “Select” and “Brick” were treated with seedapplied commercially available combo fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–559 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated plants for both cultivars had the highest percentage disease severity ranging from 50- 70 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2356–2457 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to the treated pots that had significantly low percentage disease severity, lesion numbers, and lesion size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2564–2680 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments significantly lowered tan spot severity in seed-treated plots compared with non-treated plots in field trials at both locations.

Treatment
seedapplied commercially available combo fungicidese0
Outcome
tan spot severitye1
Direction
significantly lowere1
Comparator
non-treatede1
Setting
field triale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hard red spring wheat cultivars “Select” and “Brick” were treated with seedapplied commercially available combo fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–559 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly lower tan spot severity was observed in the seed treated plots compared to non-treated in the field trial at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2693–2830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments increased the number of wheat plants per square metre compared with non-treated plots.

Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse0
Outcome
numbers of plants/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plots with fungicide seed treatments had higher numbers of plants/m2 compared to the non-treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2832–2928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter survival of wheat was significantly higher in fungicide-treated plots than in untreated plots at both locations.

Treatment
seedapplied commercially available combo fungicidese0
Outcome
Winter survivale1
Direction
significantly highe1
Comparator
the untreatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hard red spring wheat cultivars “Select” and “Brick” were treated with seedapplied commercially available combo fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–559 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter survival was significantly high in the treated plots than the untreated for both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2930–3027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated wheat plots had a significantly higher grain yield than untreated plots.

Treatment
plots treated with fungicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Likewise, there was significantly a higher grain yield for plots treated with fungicides than the untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3029–3142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin gave significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse, with low tan spot severities in treated cones.

Treatment
pyraclostrobine0
Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
tan spot severitiese0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results from the greenhouse and field study showed significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse with low tan spot severities in cones treated with pyraclostrobin, Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3887–4147 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis QST713 gave significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse, with low tan spot severities in treated cones.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis QST713e0
Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilis QST713Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tan spot severitiese0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results from the greenhouse and field study showed significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse with low tan spot severities in cones treated with pyraclostrobin, Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3887–4147 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747 gave significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse, with low tan spot severities in treated cones.

Treatment
Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747e0
Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tan spot severitiese0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results from the greenhouse and field study showed significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse with low tan spot severities in cones treated with pyraclostrobin, Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3887–4147 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 108 gave significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse, with low tan spot severities in treated cones.

Treatment
Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108e0
Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108Streptomyces lydicuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tan spot severitiese0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results from the greenhouse and field study showed significant tan spot disease control in the greenhouse with low tan spot severities in cones treated with pyraclostrobin, Bacillus subtilis QST713, Bacillus amyloquafasciens D747, Streptomyces lydicus Wyec 108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3887–4147 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treated and non-treated seeds planted in the greenhouse and inoculated with P. tritici-repentis at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin had no significant effect on tan spot disease in wheat.

Treatment
Azadirachtine0
Outcome
tan spot diseasee0
Direction
not significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azadirachtin was not significant at managing the tan spot disease or improving the plant greenness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4287–4385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant greenness of wheat was significantly higher in treated plots than in untreated plots.

Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
greennesse0
Direction
higher green ratingse0
Comparator
the untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant vigor was also significantly increased in terms of greenness with the treated plots having higher green ratings than the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4149–4285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of wheat was significantly higher in plots treated with microbial pesticides than in control and untreated plots.

Treatment
microbial pesticidese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
significantly highe0
Comparator
the control/untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Likewise, yield was significantly high in plots treated with microbial pesticides than in the control/untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4387–4504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty of ninety Pyrenophora tritici-repentis isolates were insensitive to picoxystrobin in mycelia assays.

Interactor
Pyrenphora tritici repentise1pathogen
Outcome
insensitivity to picoxystrobine0
Value
thirty out of the ninetye0
Setting
North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Kansase1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“From the mycelia assays, thirty out of the ninety isolates tested in microtiter plate assays showed insensitivity to picoxystrobin half and full rates with and without Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4818–5015 · show in text ↑
e1

“In a study to establish the sensitivity of Pyrenphora tritici repentis to fungicides, ninety isolates collected from North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Kansas were tested for sensitivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4506–4698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore germination of five Ptr isolates occurred on all fungicides tested.

Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Outcome
germination of all isolatese0
Qualifier
on all fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further assessments of the five Ptr isolates involving spores showed germination of all isolates on all fungicides with picoxystrobin having the highest percentage spore germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5017–5198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picoxystrobin gave the highest spore germination of Ptr isolates among the fungicides tested.

Treatment
picoxystrobine0
Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Outcome
percentage spore germinatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further assessments of the five Ptr isolates involving spores showed germination of all isolates on all fungicides with picoxystrobin having the highest percentage spore germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5017–5198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The double rate of the fungicides gave the least spore germination percentage across all isolates tested.

Treatment
double rate of the fungicidese0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The double rate of the fungicides had the least germination percentage for all the isolates tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5200–5298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) nullified spore germination when added to picoxystrobin.

Treatment
Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM)e0
Outcome
Spore germinatione0
Direction
nullifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore germination was nullified when the fungicide picoxystrobin was amended with Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5300–5411 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The prior insensitivity of Ptr to picoxystrobin is attributed to Ptr evading the cytochrome b site of QoI action in the absence of SHAM.

Interactor
Ptre0pathogen
Outcome
insensitivitye0
Qualifier
evading the cytochrome b site of QoI actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Diseases of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“the prior registered insensitivity was a result Ptr evading the cytochrome b site of QoI action in the absence of SHAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5512–5630 · show in text ↑

salicylhydroxamic acid · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

picoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fungicide · Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.