Paper · 2022 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Cassava-cowpea intercropping system for controlling soil erosion in the Northern mountainous areas of Vietnam

Sutkhet Nakasathien

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

On sloping lands, cassava is a food crop that often promotes severe soil erosion. Moreover, repetitive monocropping of cassava dramatically increases soil erosion and reduces soil fertility. Intercropping, a key agroecological practice, effectively manages soil erosion by increasing soil cover and improving soil fertility. In 2017, a trial was set up in Mau Dong commune, Van Yen district, Yen Bai province, Vietnam, to evaluate the feasibility of intercropping cowpea into a cassava cropping system. The results showed strong feasibility for reducing soil erosion and maintaining cassava yield. In 2018, a follow-up field experiment was undertaken to assess the effects of a cassava-cowpea intercropping on the growth and yield of cassava, and its impact on soil and nutrient losses. A completely randomized design (CRD) was adopted with 3 replications composed of 4 treatments-cassava monocropped on gentle slope, cassava monocropped on steep slope, cassava-cowpea intercropped on gentle slope, and cassava-cowpea intercropped on steep slope. The results showed that intercropping cassava with cowpea on both gentle or steep slope fields significantly improved soil cover levels (2.2 level of cover out of 10 on gentle and 1.7 on steep), reduced soil erosion (40.0% gentle and 58.2% steep) and decreased nutrient losses (15.9-35.6% nitrogen, 0-18.8% phosphorus, and 14.8-22.5% potassium). Regression analysis revealed significant correlation between dry soil erosion, percentage of soil cover, and nutrients losses. The intercropping system enhanced cassava growth, yield, harvest index, and root dry matter. Thus, cassava-cowpea intercropping system shows great potential as a strategy for soil erosion control and sustainable agricultural production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping was feasible for reducing erosion while maintaining cassava yield in the 2017 trial.

Outcome
reducing soil erosion and maintaining cassava yielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed strong feasibility for reducing soil erosion and maintaining cassava yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved soil cover on gentle and steep slopes.

Treatment
intercropping cassava with cowpeae0
Outcome
soil cover levelse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.2 level of cover out of 10 on gentle and 1.7 on steepe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping cassava with cowpea on both gentle or steep slope fields significantly improved soil cover levels (2.2 level of cover out of 10 on gentle and 1.7 on steep)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced soil erosion on gentle slopes by 40.0%.

Outcome
soil erosione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40.0%e0
Qualifier
gentlee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil erosion (40.0% gentle and 58.2% steep)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced soil erosion on steep slopes by 58.2%.

Outcome
soil erosione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58.2%e0
Qualifier
steepe0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil erosion (40.0% gentle and 58.2% steep)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased nitrogen loss by 15.9-35.6%.

Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.9-35.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased nutrient losses (15.9-35.6% nitrogen, 0-18.8% phosphorus, and 14.8-22.5% potassium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased phosphorus loss by 0-18.8%.

Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0-18.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased nutrient losses (15.9-35.6% nitrogen, 0-18.8% phosphorus, and 14.8-22.5% potassium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased potassium loss by 14.8-22.5%.

Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.8-22.5%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased nutrient losses (15.9-35.6% nitrogen, 0-18.8% phosphorus, and 14.8-22.5% potassium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1391 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry soil erosion, soil cover and nutrient losses were significantly correlated.

Outcome
dry soil erosione0
Qualifier
percentage of soil cover, and nutrients lossese0

Not reportedTaxonSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Regression analysis revealed significant correlation between dry soil erosion, percentage of soil cover, and nutrients losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping enhanced cassava growth, yield, harvest index and root dry matter.

Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
growth, yield, harvest index, and root dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropping system enhanced cassava growth, yield, harvest index, and root dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1612 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.