Paper · 2025 · Molecules

Selenium and Sulphur as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Assessment of the Content of Organic and Mineral Nitrogen Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

For many years, deficiencies in selenium (Se) and, sometimes, sulphur (S) have been observed in populations in most European countries and other parts of the world. This study aimed to determine the effect of selenium (0, 10 and 20 g Se ha−1) and the date of its application (in the tillering phase—BBCH 22–24 and in the stem elongation phase—BBCH 31–34) and sulphur application (0, 15 and 30 kg S ha−1) on the content of various forms of nitrogen (total nitrogen, protein nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, and nitrate nitrogen) in winter spelt wheat and winter common wheat. Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat. In spelt, grain total-N decreased by 4%, while common wheat straw increased by 13%. Application timing had no significant effect on total-N. Sulphur slightly raised total-N in common wheat grain and straw. Selenium reduced protein-N in spelt grain by 7% but increased it in common wheat straw by 18%. Ammonium-N in straw rose by 24–27%, while nitrate-N declined in grain and straw of both species. Sulphur-enhanced mineral N forms (ammonium-N by 6–16%, nitrate-N by 7–24%), especially in the early stages. Se–S fertilization strategies should consider their competitive uptake and impact on N metabolism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium reduced grain total nitrogen in spelt by 4%.

Material
spelte0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Seleniume1
Outcome
grain total-Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spelt, grain total-N decreased by 4%, while common wheat straw increased by 13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common wheat straw total nitrogen increased by 13% after selenium application.

Material
common wheate0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Seleniume1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spelt, grain total-N decreased by 4%, while common wheat straw increased by 13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing had no significant effect on total nitrogen.

Treatment
Application timinge0
Outcome
total-Ne0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application timing had no significant effect on total-N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur slightly increased total nitrogen in common wheat grain and straw.

Material
common wheate0
Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
total-N in common wheat grain and strawe0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur slightly raised total-N in common wheat grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium reduced protein nitrogen in spelt grain by 7%.

Material
spelte0
Treatment
Seleniume0
Outcome
protein-N in spelt graine0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenium reduced protein-N in spelt grain by 7% but increased it in common wheat straw by 18%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium increased protein nitrogen in common wheat straw by 18%.

Material
common wheate0
Treatment
Seleniume0
Outcome
common wheat strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenium reduced protein-N in spelt grain by 7% but increased it in common wheat straw by 18%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw ammonium nitrogen rose by 24–27%.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Seleniume1
Outcome
Ammonium-N in strawe0
Direction
rosee0
Value
24–27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N in straw rose by 24–27%, while nitrate-N declined in grain and straw of both species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate nitrogen declined in grain and straw of both species.

Treatment
Seleniume1
Outcome
nitrate-Ne0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
grain and straw of both speciese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N in straw rose by 24–27%, while nitrate-N declined in grain and straw of both species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur increased ammonium nitrogen by 6–16%.

Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
ammonium-Ne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
6–16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur-enhanced mineral N forms (ammonium-N by 6–16%, nitrate-N by 7–24%), especially in the early stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur increased nitrate nitrogen by 7–24%.

Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
nitrate-Ne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
7–24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur-enhanced mineral N forms (ammonium-N by 6–16%, nitrate-N by 7–24%), especially in the early stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selenium application influenced nitrogen distribution in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–634 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.