Abstract
Using the optical vulnerability method, we evaluated leaf and stem embolism resistance across three Populus species (P. trichocarpa, P. deltoides, and P. grandidentata) grown under field and glasshouse conditions to explore the mechanisms of vulnerability segmentation between organs. Classical vulnerability segmentation occurs when leaf xylem is more vulnerable to embolism than stem xylem, with leaves serving as hydraulic 'fuses' that protect the hydraulic integrity of the stem during drought. Recent evidence suggests that reverse vulnerability segmentation-when leaves have higher embolism resistance than stems-may occur in Populus species. We observed reverse segmentation exclusively in field-grown older stems, while no segmentation was found in glasshouse-grown or newly formed stems. X-ray micro-computed tomography and hydraulic measurements confirmed that the more vulnerable field-grown older stems had significant native embolism (>25% loss of conductivity). These findings support the hypothesis that reverse segmentation arises not from inherent xylem properties, but from the accumulation of native embolism, probably induced by winter freeze-thaw cycles or stem age. Our results provide a mechanistic explanation for reverse segmentation and suggest that its occurrence in Populus may be a byproduct of environment and life history rather than an adaptive trait of xylem architecture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Reverse segmentation occurred exclusively in field-grown older stems.
PopulusNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“We observed reverse segmentation exclusively in field-grown older stems”
t0“Populus”
Claim · model-written summary
No segmentation was found in glasshouse-grown stems.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no segmentation was found in glasshouse-grown or newly formed stems”
t0“Populus”
Claim · model-written summary
No segmentation was found in newly formed stems.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no segmentation was found in glasshouse-grown or newly formed stems”
t0“Populus”
Claim · model-written summary
More vulnerable field-grown older stems had native embolism exceeding 25% conductivity loss.
- Organ / stage
- older stemse0
- Outcome
- native embolisme0
- Direction
- more vulnerablee0
- Value
- >25% loss of conductivitye0
- Setting
- field-growne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the more vulnerable field-grown older stems had significant native embolism (>25% loss of conductivity)”
t0“Populus”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed reverse segmentation to accumulated native embolism, possibly from freezing or age.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reverse segmentation arises not from inherent xylem properties, but from the accumulation of native embolism, probably induced by winter freeze-thaw cycles or stem age”
t0“Populus”