Paper · 2025 · Carbon Balance and Management

Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage in three gorges reservoir’s water-level fluctuation zone

Xianglong Liu; Qiuhong Li; Peng Xu; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The water level fluctuation zone (WLFZ) of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) represents a unique ecotone shaped by reversed hydrological rhythms that significantly influence plant dynamics and soil organic carbon (SOC) processes. However, the contribution of plants to SOC storage after the establishment of stable plant communities remains unclear. A field investigation and soil sampling were conducted in the WLFZ of the TGR in 2023, covering both the main stream and tributary regions in middle- (155-165 m) and high-elevation (165-175 m) zones. The plant composition, diversity, and carbon and nitrogen contents of soil and vegetation and the carbon stable isotope ratio signatures were analyzed. Results showed that plant diversity increased with elevation, while biomass allocation varied significantly between elevation zones. Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. had a significantly higher biomass than Xanthium strumarium L., both of which were identified as dominant species in the WLFZ based on their high importance values. The response of SOC storage to elevation differed between regions: in the main stream, SOC storage was 23% higher in the middle-elevation than in the high-elevation zone, while in the tributary, SOC storage in the high-elevation zone exceeding that in the middle-elevation zone by 38%. Soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratio were the primary factors controlling SOC storage, explaining 68.6% of the variance, while plant effects were relatively weak. Isotopic mixing model results indicated that X. strumarium contributed 34.84% to SOC storage at 165-175m, whereas C. dactylon contributed 21.06% at 155-165 m, but this difference occurred within the context of a minor overall plant contribution to SOC. These results highlight that SOC dynamics are primarily controlled by soil factors (soil nitrogen and the C/N ratio), with plants having a secondary effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant diversity increased with elevation in the water-level fluctuation zone.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Treatment
elevatione1
Outcome
plant diversitye1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
water level fluctuation zonee0

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that plant diversity increased with elevation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–761 · show in text ↑
e0

“The water level fluctuation zone (WLFZ) of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cynodon dactylon had significantly higher biomass than Xanthium strumarium.

Taxon
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.Cynodon dactylone2
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Xanthium strumarium L.e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. had a significantly higher biomass than Xanthium strumarium L., both of which were identified as dominant species in the WLFZ based on their high importance values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cynodon dactylon was a dominant species in the WLFZ based on high importance values.

Taxon
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.Cynodon dactylone2
Outcome
dominant speciese2
Qualifier
based on their high importance valuese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. had a significantly higher biomass than Xanthium strumarium L., both of which were identified as dominant species in the WLFZ based on their high importance values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xanthium strumarium was a dominant species in the WLFZ based on high importance values.

Taxon
Xanthium strumarium L.Xanthium strumariume2
Outcome
dominant speciese2
Qualifier
based on their high importance valuese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium
Xanthium strumarium · TaxonGeorge Chernilevsky · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. had a significantly higher biomass than Xanthium strumarium L., both of which were identified as dominant species in the WLFZ based on their high importance values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass allocation varied significantly between elevation zones.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Outcome
biomass allocatione3
Direction
variede3
Qualifier
between elevation zonese3

Verbatim

e3

“biomass allocation varied significantly between elevation zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the main stream, SOC storage was 23% higher in the middle-elevation zone than in the high-elevation zone.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Treatment
middle-elevatione4
Outcome
SOC storagee4
Direction
highere4
Value
23%e4
Comparator
high-elevation zonee4
Setting
main streame4

Verbatim

e4

“in the main stream, SOC storage was 23% higher in the middle-elevation than in the high-elevation zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the tributary, SOC storage in the high-elevation zone exceeded that in the middle-elevation zone by 38%.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Treatment
high-elevation zonee5
Outcome
SOC storagee5
Direction
exceedinge5
Value
38%e5
Comparator
middle-elevation zonee5
Setting
tributarye5

Verbatim

e5

“in the tributary, SOC storage in the high-elevation zone exceeding that in the middle-elevation zone by 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratio were the primary factors controlling SOC storage, explaining 68.6% of the variance.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Treatment
Soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratioe6
Outcome
SOC storagee6
Value
68.6%e6
Qualifier
explaining 68.6% of the variancee6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e6

“Soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratio were the primary factors controlling SOC storage, explaining 68.6% of the variance, while plant effects were relatively weak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant effects on SOC storage were relatively weak.

Taxon
Dominant plantst0
Outcome
plant effectse6
Direction
relatively weake6

Verbatim

e6

“Soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratio were the primary factors controlling SOC storage, explaining 68.6% of the variance, while plant effects were relatively weak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

X. strumarium contributed 34.84% to SOC storage at 165-175 m.

Taxon
X. strumariumXanthium strumariume7
Outcome
SOC storagee7
Value
34.84%e7
Setting
165-175me7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium
Xanthium strumarium · TaxonGeorge Chernilevsky · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Isotopic mixing model results indicated that X. strumarium contributed 34.84% to SOC storage at 165-175m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

C. dactylon contributed 21.06% to SOC storage at 155-165 m.

Taxon
C. dactylonCynodon dactylone6
Outcome
SOC storagee7
Value
21.06%e6
Setting
155-165 me6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Isotopic mixing model results indicated that X. strumarium contributed 34.84% to SOC storage at 165-175m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1581 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas C. dactylon contributed 21.06% at 155-165 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dominant plants drive soil organic carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑