Paper · 2010 · eScholarship (California Digital Library)

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2009 field trial

Ian S. Bay; Christopher N. Janousek; W. D. Gubler

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phomopsis cane and leaf spot is a disease that can be economically important in California during wet years along the northern coast and in the northern San Joaquin Valley. A field trial was conducted in Solano County, CA to evaluate the efficacy of several registered and experimental fungicides on control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on Thompson seedless grapes. Fungicide treatment significantly affected leaf severity. Kresoxim methyl (at 6.4 oz/acre) and pyraclostrobin + boscalid provided the best protection; kresoxim methyl (at 4.0 oz/acre) and Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 (12 oz/acre) also reduced leaf severity. Shoot disease severity also differed significantly among treatments; data suggested that the best disease control was achieved by treatment with pyraclostrobin + boscalid or kresoxim methyl (both application rates).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatment significantly affected grape leaf disease severity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
leaf severitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treatment significantly affected leaf severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kresoxim methyl at 6.4 oz/acre provided the best grape leaf protection.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Kresoxim methyl (at 6.4 oz/acre)e0
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Kresoxim methyl (at 6.4 oz/acre) and pyraclostrobin + boscalid provided the best protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin plus boscalid provided the best grape leaf protection.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + boscalide0
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Kresoxim methyl (at 6.4 oz/acre) and pyraclostrobin + boscalid provided the best protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kresoxim methyl at 4.0 oz/acre reduced grape leaf severity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
kresoxim methyl (at 4.0 oz/acre)e0
Outcome
leaf severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“kresoxim methyl (at 4.0 oz/acre) and Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 (12 oz/acre) also reduced leaf severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 at 12 oz/acre reduced grape leaf severity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 (12 oz/acre)e0
Interactor
Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108Streptomyces lydicuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“kresoxim methyl (at 4.0 oz/acre) and Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 (12 oz/acre) also reduced leaf severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot disease severity differed significantly among treatments.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Shoot disease severitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot disease severity also differed significantly among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin plus boscalid achieved the best shoot disease control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pyraclostrobin + boscalide0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“best disease control was achieved by treatment with pyraclostrobin + boscalid or kresoxim methyl (both application rates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kresoxim methyl at both rates achieved the best shoot disease control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
kresoxim methyle0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
both application ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“best disease control was achieved by treatment with pyraclostrobin + boscalid or kresoxim methyl (both application rates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑

kresoxim-methyl · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

kresoxim-methyl · control · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boscalid · control · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.