Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The listed other chemical fungicides were ineffective at inhibiting I. liriodendri mycelia.

A claim from MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF BLACK FOOT DISEASE PATHOGENS IN GRAPEVINE NURSERIES AND EVALUATION OF SOME FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROL OF THE MOST VIRULENT ISOLATES · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed other chemical fungicides were ineffective at inhibiting I. liriodendri mycelia.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment
boscalid + kresoxim-methyl, promocarb hydrochloride (HCL) + fosetyl-al, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, fludioxonil + metalaxyl–me0
Outcome
mycelial inhibitione0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical fungicides mixtures of boscalid + kresoxim-methyl, promocarb hydrochloride (HCL) + fosetyl-al, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, fludioxonil + metalaxyl–m and individual fungicides; cyprodinil, fluoxapyroxad, hymexazole, fenhexamid and 8-hydroxyquinoline sulphate were not effective on mycelial inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1989
t0

“GRAPEVINE NURSERIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–81

Title

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF BLACK FOOT DISEASE PATHOGENS IN GRAPEVINE NURSERIES AND EVALUATION OF SOME FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROL OF THE MOST VIRULENT ISOLATES

Murat YILDIZ; Necip TOSUN Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences 2022. doi:10.23902/trkjnat.1037376

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e550325be6e84a36460044a3d5ea1c9f9647bc8f86e98f0302e067188e836c00 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

boscalid · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

kresoxim-methyl · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

difenoconazole · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.