Paper · 1990 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Predicting Late Season Nitrogen Fertilizer Requirements of Irrigated Durum Wheat Using Stem Nitrate Analyses

Thomas A. Doerge; Mike Ottman

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a Casa Grande sandy loam at the Maricopa Agricultural Center to 1) determine the optimum rates of late season N needed to achieve optimum yield and quality of irrigated dumm wheat in conjunction with varying rates of early season N, and 2) to evaluate the usefulness of stem NO₃⁻N analysis in predicting the late season N rates which optimize grain production but minimize the potential for nitrate pollution of groundwater. The application of 80, 195 and 350 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with deficient, sufficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis. The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to N-deficient wheat and 15 lbs. N/a to N-sufficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels above 14% but had little effect on grain yield. Applications of N at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield or quality. The use of stem NO₃⁻N analysis appears to be a useful tool in predicting the minimum N rate to be applied during the early reproductive period to insure acceptable levels of grain protein at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 80 lbs. N/a produced deficient wheat nitrogen status.

Treatment
80e0
Outcome
deficiente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 80, 195 and 350 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with deficient, sufficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 195 lbs. N/a produced sufficient wheat nitrogen status.

Treatment
195e0
Outcome
sufficiente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 80, 195 and 350 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with deficient, sufficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 350 lbs. N/a produced excessive wheat nitrogen status.

Treatment
350 lbs. N/ae0
Outcome
excessive N statuse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 80, 195 and 350 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with deficient, sufficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading nitrogen in deficient wheat yielded grain protein above 14%.

Treatment
60 lbs. N/a at headinge0
Outcome
grain protein levelse0
Direction
abovee0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to N-deficient wheat and 15 lbs. N/a to N-sufficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels above 14% but had little effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading nitrogen in sufficient wheat yielded grain protein above 14%.

Treatment
15 lbs. N/ae0
Outcome
grain protein levelse0
Direction
abovee0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to N-deficient wheat and 15 lbs. N/a to N-sufficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels above 14% but had little effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These heading nitrogen applications had little effect on grain yield.

Treatment
The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to N-deficient wheat and 15 lbs. N/a to N-sufficient wheate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to N-deficient wheat and 15 lbs. N/a to N-sufficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels above 14% but had little effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading nitrogen did not affect grain yield after excessive early nitrogen.

Treatment
Applications of N at headinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of N at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading nitrogen did not affect grain quality after excessive early nitrogen.

Treatment
Applications of N at headinge0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of N at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–952 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem nitrate analysis appeared useful for predicting minimum nitrogen to secure grain protein.

Outcome
predicting the minimum N ratee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The use of stem NO₃⁻N analysis appears to be a useful tool in predicting the minimum N rate to be applied during the early reproductive period to insure acceptable levels of grain protein at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1152 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 410 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.