Paper · 1991 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Improved Late Season Nitrogen Fertilizer Management with Irrigated Durum Wheat Using Stem Nitrate Analyses

Thomas A. Doerge; Mike Ottman

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a Trix clay loam at the Maricopa Agricultural Center to 1) determine the optimum rates of late season N needed to achieve optimum yield and quality of irrigated durum wheat in conjunction with varying rates of early season N, and 2) to evaluate the usefulness of stem NO₃⁻N analysis in predicting the late season N rates which optimize grain production but minimize the potential for nitrate pollution of groundwater. The application of 75, 150 and 300 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with highly deficient, slightly deficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis. The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to highly N-deficient and slightly N-deficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels of 12.7 and 14.3 % respectively but had little effect on grain yield. Applications from 0 to 60 lbs. N /acre at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield but did increase grain protein levels from 15.2 to 17.4 %. The use of stem NO₃⁻N analysis appears to be a useful tool in predicting the minimum N rate to be applied during the early reproductive period to insure acceptable levels of grain protein at harvest in cases where N status during the vegetative period was not highly deficient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nitrogen rate 75 produced highly deficient nitrogen status at boot stage.

Organ / stage
boot stagee0t0
Treatment
75e0t0
Outcome
highly deficiente0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75, 150 and 300 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with highly deficient, slightly deficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nitrogen rate 150 produced slightly deficient nitrogen status at boot stage.

Organ / stage
boot stagee0t0
Treatment
150e0t0
Outcome
slightly deficiente0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75, 150 and 300 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with highly deficient, slightly deficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nitrogen rate 300 produced excessive nitrogen status at boot stage.

Organ / stage
boot stagee0t0
Treatment
300e0t0
Outcome
excessivee0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75, 150 and 300 lbs. N/a during vegetative growth resulted in wheat with highly deficient, slightly deficient and excessive N status at the boot stage as indicated by stem NO₃⁻N analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late application of 60 lbs. N/a gave grain protein 12.7 in highly N-deficient wheat.

Treatment
60 lbs. N/a at headinge0t0
Outcome
grain protein levelse0t0
Value
12.7e0t0
Qualifier
highly N-deficiente0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to highly N-deficient and slightly N-deficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels of 12.7 and 14.3 % respectively but had little effect on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late application of 60 lbs. N/a gave grain protein 14.3 % in slightly N-deficient wheat.

Treatment
60 lbs. N/a at headinge0t0
Outcome
grain protein levelse0t0
Value
14.3 %e0t0
Qualifier
slightly N-deficiente0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to highly N-deficient and slightly N-deficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels of 12.7 and 14.3 % respectively but had little effect on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen had little effect on grain yield in deficient wheat.

Treatment
60 lbs. N/a at headinge0t0
Outcome
grain yielde0t0
Direction
little effecte0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 60 lbs. N/a at heading to highly N-deficient and slightly N-deficient wheat resulted in grain protein levels of 12.7 and 14.3 % respectively but had little effect on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen rates of 0 to 60 lbs. N/acre did not affect yield after excessive early nitrogen.

Treatment
0 to 60 lbs. N /acre at headinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
previously received excessive Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications from 0 to 60 lbs. N /acre at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen increased grain protein from 15.2 to 17.4% after excessive early nitrogen.

Treatment
0 to 60 lbs. N /acre at headinge0
Outcome
grain protein levelse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15.2 to 17.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications from 0 to 60 lbs. N /acre at heading to wheat which had previously received excessive N did not affect grain yield but did increase grain protein levels from 15.2 to 17.4 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1045 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem nitrate analysis was judged useful for selecting minimum early reproductive nitrogen rates for acceptable protein when vegetative deficiency was not high.

Outcome
predicting the minimum N ratee0t0
Qualifier
N status during the vegetative period was not highly deficiente0t0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of stem NO₃⁻N analysis appears to be a useful tool in predicting the minimum N rate to be applied during the early reproductive period to insure acceptable levels of grain protein at harvest in cases where N status during the vegetative period was not highly deficient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.