Paper · 2009

Direct seeding of Diospyros lotus in rocky hills.

Qingmei Li; Hou LongYu; Liu Yan; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to relieve chilling and drought injuries and improve the emergence rate and preserving rate to ensure the vegetation restoration in rocky hills in northern China,taking Diospyros lotus,an indigenous tree species with stress resistance as sample,effects of different treatments,including mulching film,grass cover,block cover,a water retaining agent,rooting powder and open field (control),on direct seeding were studied. The results showed that:1) mulching film increased average daily temperature of soil,while grass cover and block cover decreased it; 2) mulching film,grass cover and water retaining agent could improve the content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soil; 3) mulching film,grass cover and block cover had significant higher emergence speed and emergence rate; mulching film could promote the growth of seedlings,while water retaining agent and rooting powder had no significant effect; 4) after 180 d of seeding,no significant differences were found in preserving rate,seedling height and ground diameter among all treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching film increased average daily soil temperature.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
mulching filme0
Outcome
average daily temperature of soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film increased average daily temperature of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass cover decreased average daily soil temperature.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
grass covere0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grass cover and block cover decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Block cover decreased average daily soil temperature.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
block covere0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grass cover and block cover decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching film improved soil water content and soil drought resistance.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
mulching filme0
Outcome
content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soile0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and water retaining agent could improve the content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass cover improved soil water content and soil drought resistance.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
grass covere0
Outcome
content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soile0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and water retaining agent could improve the content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water retaining agent improved soil water content and soil drought resistance.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
water retaining agente0
Outcome
content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soile0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and water retaining agent could improve the content of soil water and enhance the dry resistance of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching film significantly increased emergence speed and emergence rate.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
mulching filme0
Outcome
emergence speed and emergence ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and block cover had significant higher emergence speed and emergence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass cover significantly increased emergence speed and emergence rate.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
grass covere0
Outcome
emergence speed and emergence ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and block cover had significant higher emergence speed and emergence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Block cover significantly increased emergence speed and emergence rate.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
block covere0
Outcome
emergence speed and emergence ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film,grass cover and block cover had significant higher emergence speed and emergence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching film promoted seedling growth.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
mulching filme0
Outcome
growth of seedlingse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film could promote the growth of seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water retaining agent had no significant effect on seedling growth.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
water retaining agente0
Outcome
growth of seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film could promote the growth of seedlings,while water retaining agent and rooting powder had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting powder had no significant effect on seedling growth.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Treatment
rooting powdere0
Outcome
growth of seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching film could promote the growth of seedlings,while water retaining agent and rooting powder had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 180 days after seeding, preserving rate did not differ significantly across treatments.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Outcome
preserving ratee0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
after 180 d of seedinge0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 180 d of seeding,no significant differences were found in preserving rate,seedling height and ground diameter among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 180 days after seeding, seedling height did not differ significantly across treatments.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Outcome
seedling heighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
after 180 d of seedinge0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 180 d of seeding,no significant differences were found in preserving rate,seedling height and ground diameter among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 180 days after seeding, ground diameter did not differ significantly across treatments.

Taxon
Diospyros lotusDiospyros lotust0
Outcome
ground diametere0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
after 180 d of seedinge0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros lotus
Diospyros lotus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 180 d of seeding,no significant differences were found in preserving rate,seedling height and ground diameter among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Diospyros lotus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑