Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Economic Feasibility and Nutritional Security of Tribal Farmers through Grow Bag-based Organic Vegetables Production in Chhattisgarh Plain Agro-climatic Zone, Madhya Pradesh

R. K. Thakur; S. K. Rai; S. Bhalawe; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present study was conducted in January-December, 2023 under the ICAR-supported Tribal Sub Plan (TSP) at 150 tribal farmers across the Baihar, Paraswada, and Birsa developmental blocks of the Balaghat district, Madhya Pradesh, India to assess the impact of grow bag-based organic vegetable cultivation on productivity, profitability, and nutritional well-being among tribal communities in the Chhattisgarh Plain Agro-climatic Zone of Madhya Pradesh. Farmers were provided with complete input kits, including grow bags, drip irrigation setups, enriched organic nutrients, and seedlings of four vegetable crops i.e. tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chili. In comparison to traditional farming, the grow bag system showed marked improvements. Average yields per 25 bags reached 356 kg for tomato, 230 kg for brinjal, 40 kg for cabbage, and 33 kg for chili, nearly doubling the output from existing conventional methods. Economic analysis revealed a sharp rise in the benefit–cost ratio from 1.40 (farmers' practice) to 2.88 under the improved package. Extension and technology gap studies highlighted critical knowledge shortfalls, emphasizing the value of focused capacity-building. Beyond yield and income, the initiative enhanced household dietary diversity and vegetable intake frequency. Largely, the intervention demonstrated high adaptability and scalability, offering a sustainable, space-efficient model for year-round vegetable cultivation, improved nutrition, and livelihood security in resource-poor tribal settings. Thus, the grow bag based organic vegetable production technology significantly superior from the traditional methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grow bag tomato yield reached 356 kg per 25 bags, nearly doubling conventional output.

Treatment
the grow bag systeme1
Outcome
yields per 25 bagse0
Direction
nearly doublinge0
Value
356 kge0
Comparator
traditional farminge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average yields per 25 bags reached 356 kg for tomato, 230 kg for brinjal, 40 kg for cabbage, and 33 kg for chili, nearly doubling the output from existing conventional methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grow bag system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“traditional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grow bag brinjal yield reached 230 kg per 25 bags, nearly doubling conventional output.

Treatment
the grow bag systeme1
Outcome
yields per 25 bagse0
Direction
nearly doublinge0
Value
230 kge0
Comparator
traditional farminge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average yields per 25 bags reached 356 kg for tomato, 230 kg for brinjal, 40 kg for cabbage, and 33 kg for chili, nearly doubling the output from existing conventional methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grow bag system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“traditional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grow bag cabbage yield reached 40 kg per 25 bags, nearly doubling conventional output.

Treatment
the grow bag systeme1
Outcome
yields per 25 bagse0
Direction
nearly doublinge0
Value
40 kge0
Comparator
traditional farminge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average yields per 25 bags reached 356 kg for tomato, 230 kg for brinjal, 40 kg for cabbage, and 33 kg for chili, nearly doubling the output from existing conventional methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grow bag system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“traditional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grow bag chili yield reached 33 kg per 25 bags, nearly doubling conventional output.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
the grow bag systeme1
Outcome
yields per 25 bagse0
Direction
nearly doublinge0
Value
33 kge0
Comparator
traditional farminge2

Verbatim

e0

“Average yields per 25 bags reached 356 kg for tomato, 230 kg for brinjal, 40 kg for cabbage, and 33 kg for chili, nearly doubling the output from existing conventional methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grow bag system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“traditional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved package raised the benefit–cost ratio to 2.88 from 1.40 under farmers practice.

Taxon
tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chilie1
Treatment
the improved packagee0
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
sharp risee0
Value
2.88e0
Qualifier
1.40e0
Comparator
farmers' practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“Economic analysis revealed a sharp rise in the benefit–cost ratio from 1.40 (farmers' practice) to 2.88 under the improved package.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extension and technology gap studies found critical knowledge shortfalls.

Taxon
tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chilie1
Outcome
critical knowledge shortfallse0

Verbatim

e0

“Extension and technology gap studies highlighted critical knowledge shortfalls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initiative enhanced household dietary diversity and vegetable intake frequency.

Taxon
tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chilie1
Treatment
the initiativee0
Outcome
household dietary diversity and vegetable intake frequencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Beyond yield and income, the initiative enhanced household dietary diversity and vegetable intake frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–652 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged grow bag organic vegetable technology significantly superior to traditional methods.

Taxon
tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chilie1
Outcome
grow bag based organic vegetable production technologye0
Comparator
traditional methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the grow bag based organic vegetable production technology significantly superior from the traditional methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1643 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, brinjal, cabbage, and chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–652 · show in text ↑

storage · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

storage · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.