Paper · 2025 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Physio-biochemical and antioxidative enzymatic changes in ambient stored ‘Misribhog’ mango in response to chitosan and aloe vera gel coatings

Md. Rukunuzzaman; Md. Atikur Rahman; Mst. Ananya Khatun; et al.

16
claims
74
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Purpose: Mango shelf life has significance for both market availability and long-distance transportation. So, effective treatments of postharvest are vital for maintaining the climacteric character of mangoes by limiting postharvest losses during storage. Research method: A total of 96 physiologically mature mango fruits (8 fruits in each replication) were taken. This study assessed the effect of Aloe vera gel (1:1 AVG), chitosan (1.5% CTS), and combinations (CTS+AVG) on mango shelf life and postharvest features following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH). The experiment was conducted using completely randomized design. Findings: The results demonstrated that either CTS or AVG had a positive effect compared to control on different parameters but their combinations was considerably superior treatment equated to the control in terms of weight loss (13.09, 20.03%), reduced respiration rate (11.22, 19.89 mlCO2/kg/h), ethylene production (0.50, 0.56 µl/kg/h), total soluble solids (17.33, 22.23 oBrix), pH (5.86, 7.40) and decay percentage (13.14, 27.64%). Fruit quality metrics were all higher when CTS+AVG was used than the control, such as titratable acidity (0.66, 0.61), fruit firmness (28.61, 21.95 N/m2), ascorbic acid (14.52, 10.84 mg/100g), total phenolic content (112.99, 80.02 mg GAE/100g) and antioxidant activity (274.86, 196.65 µmol/g). Coated fruits exhibited a considerable reduction in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (5.49, 7.87 U/mg FW), while higher levels of catalase (CAT) (0.54, 0.45 U/mg FW) and peroxidase (POD) (0.75, 0.70 U/mg FW) enzyme activity. During storage, coated fruit peels exhibited notably less discoloration than control fruits. Research limitations: In future, mechanism of CTS and AVG for prolonging shelf life of mangoes will be revealed using molecular approach. Originality/Value: These results suggest that chitosan (CTS) and Aloe vera gel (AVG) coatings combined can preserve ‘Mishribhog’ mango shelf life and postharvest quality for 16 days during ambient storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating was superior to control in weight loss of mango fruit during 16 days of ambient storage (values 13.09 and 20.03%).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
superiore1
Value
13.09, 20.03%e1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“considerably superior treatment equated to the control in terms of weight loss (13.09, 20.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–888 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating reduced respiration rate of mango fruit relative to control (values 11.22 and 19.89 mlCO2/kg/h).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
respiration ratee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
11.22, 19.89 mlCO2/kg/he1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“reduced respiration rate (11.22, 19.89 mlCO2/kg/h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–940 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating lowered ethylene production of mango fruit relative to control (values 0.50 and 0.56 µl/kg/h).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
ethylene productione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
0.50, 0.56 µl/kg/he1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ethylene production (0.50, 0.56 µl/kg/h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–982 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating lowered total soluble solids of mango fruit relative to control (values 17.33 and 22.23 oBrix).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
total soluble solidse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
17.33, 22.23 oBrixe1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“total soluble solids (17.33, 22.23 oBrix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1025 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating lowered pH of mango fruit relative to control (values 5.86 and 7.40).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
5.86, 7.40e1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“pH (5.86, 7.40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1042 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS+AVG combined coating lowered decay percentage of mango fruit relative to control (values 13.14 and 27.64%).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
decay percentagee1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
13.14, 27.64%e1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“decay percentage (13.14, 27.64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1079 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit titratable acidity of mango was higher with CTS+AVG than with control (values 0.66 and 0.61).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe1
Outcome
titratable aciditye1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.66, 0.61e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruit quality metrics were all higher when CTS+AVG was used than the control, such as titratable acidity (0.66, 0.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1198 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness of mango was higher with CTS+AVG than with control (values 28.61 and 21.95 N/m2).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
fruit firmnesse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
28.61, 21.95 N/m2e1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“fruit firmness (28.61, 21.95 N/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1234 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid of mango was higher with CTS+AVG than with control (values 14.52 and 10.84 mg/100g).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
ascorbic acide1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
14.52, 10.84 mg/100ge1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ascorbic acid (14.52, 10.84 mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content of mango was higher with CTS+AVG than with control (values 112.99 and 80.02 mg GAE/100g).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
total phenolic contente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
112.99, 80.02 mg GAE/100ge1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“total phenolic content (112.99, 80.02 mg GAE/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1324 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity of mango was higher with CTS+AVG than with control (values 274.86 and 196.65 µmol/g).

Treatment
CTS+AVGe4
Outcome
antioxidant activitye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
274.86, 196.65 µmol/ge1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“antioxidant activity (274.86, 196.65 µmol/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1373 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e4

“combinations (CTS+AVG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–472 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated mango fruit showed a considerable reduction in polyphenol oxidase activity relative to control (values 5.49 and 7.87 U/mg FW).

Treatment
Coated fruitse1
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e1
Direction
reductione1
Value
5.49, 7.87 U/mg FWe1
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Coated fruits exhibited a considerable reduction in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (5.49, 7.87 U/mg FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1472 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated mango fruit showed higher catalase activity than control (values 0.54 and 0.45 U/mg FW).

Treatment
Coated fruitse1
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e7
Direction
highere7
Value
0.54, 0.45 U/mg FWe7
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Coated fruits exhibited a considerable reduction in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (5.49, 7.87 U/mg FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1472 · show in text ↑
e7

“higher levels of catalase (CAT) (0.54, 0.45 U/mg FW) and peroxidase (POD) (0.75, 0.70 U/mg FW) enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1590 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated mango fruit showed higher peroxidase activity than control (values 0.75 and 0.70 U/mg FW).

Treatment
Coated fruitse1
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e7
Direction
highere7
Value
0.75, 0.70 U/mg FWe7
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Coated fruits exhibited a considerable reduction in polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (5.49, 7.87 U/mg FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1472 · show in text ↑
e7

“higher levels of catalase (CAT) (0.54, 0.45 U/mg FW) and peroxidase (POD) (0.75, 0.70 U/mg FW) enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1590 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
e5

“compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated mango fruit peels showed notably less discoloration than control fruit during storage.

Organ / stage
peelse6
Treatment
coated fruit peelse6
Outcome
discoloratione6
Direction
lesse6
Comparator
control fruitse6
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“coated fruit peels exhibited notably less discoloration than control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1683 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Either CTS or AVG alone had a positive effect on several mango parameters compared to control.

Treatment
CTS or AVGe1
Outcome
different parameterse1
Direction
positivee1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
ambient storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“either CTS or AVG had a positive effect compared to control on different parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“96 physiologically mature mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“following 16 days at ambient storage (28±3°C and 80±5% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–576 · show in text ↑

Aloe vera · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Aloe vera · physiology: hormones · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · soil: chemistry · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Aloe vera · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Aloe vera · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Aloe vera · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · physiology: hormones · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.