Paper · 2007 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effect of chitosan on ripening, enzymatic activity, and disease development in mango ( mangifera indica ) fruit

Pongphen Jitareerat; Sudkanueng Paumchai; Sirichai Kanlayanarat; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
97
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of chitosan on mycelial growth and spore germination of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides were investigated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) containing 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% (w/v) chitosan dissolved in 0.5% acetic acid. Complete inhibition of mycelial growth and spore germination was observed in the medium containing only 0.5% acetic acid. Media containing chitosan were less inhibitory, but the highest concentrations of chitosan, at 1.5% and 2.0%, were more inhibitory than the lower concentrations (0.5% and 1.0%). Chitosan treatment (0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) of mangoes {Mangifera indica) previously inoculated with C. gloeosporioides resulted in a lower rate of disease progression compared with the controls. Chitosan concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0% had stimulatory effects on chitinase and β‐1,3‐glucanase activities. Additionally, chitosan coatings in mangoes delayed ripening and reduced respiration rate, ethylene production, and the loss of weight, ascorbic acid, and total titratable acidity. However, the firmness of mangoes treated at concentrations above 1% caused a perceptible decline in sensory quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid alone fully inhibited pathogen growth and germination in medium.

Treatment
0.5% acetic acide0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth and spore germinatione0
Direction
Complete inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete inhibition of mycelial growth and spore germination was observed in the medium containing only 0.5% acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan media were less inhibitory than acetic acid alone.

Treatment
chitosane0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
less inhibitorye0
Direction
less inhibitorye0
Comparator
0.5% acetic acide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Media containing chitosan were less inhibitory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“medium containing only 0.5% acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–364 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5% and 2.0% chitosan media were more inhibitory than lower concentrations.

Treatment
chitosan, at 1.5% and 2.0%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitorye0
Direction
more inhibitorye0
Comparator
lower concentrations (0.5% and 1.0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest concentrations of chitosan, at 1.5% and 2.0%, were more inhibitory than the lower concentrations (0.5% and 1.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan reduced mango disease progression versus controls.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
Chitosan treatment (0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%)e0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
rate of disease progressione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan treatment (0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) of mangoes {Mangifera indica) previously inoculated with C. gloeosporioides resulted in a lower rate of disease progression compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.5% and 1.0% stimulated chitinase and glucanase activities.

Treatment
Chitosan concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0%e0
Outcome
chitinase and β‐1,3‐glucanase activitiese0
Direction
stimulatorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0% had stimulatory effects on chitinase and β‐1,3‐glucanase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coatings delayed mango ripening.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
chitosan coatingse0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan coatings in mangoes delayed ripening and reduced respiration rate, ethylene production, and the loss of weight, ascorbic acid, and total titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coatings reduced respiration rate and ethylene production.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
chitosan coatingse0
Outcome
respiration rate, ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan coatings in mangoes delayed ripening and reduced respiration rate, ethylene production, and the loss of weight, ascorbic acid, and total titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coatings reduced losses of weight, ascorbic acid and titratable acidity.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
chitosan coatingse0
Outcome
loss of weight, ascorbic acid, and total titratable aciditye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan coatings in mangoes delayed ripening and reduced respiration rate, ethylene production, and the loss of weight, ascorbic acid, and total titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations above 1% reduced mango sensory quality through firmness.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
concentrations above 1%e0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
firmnesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the firmness of mangoes treated at concentrations above 1% caused a perceptible decline in sensory quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1149 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: hormones · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.