Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods. The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1. Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 in each establishment method of wheat recorded 100% weed control efficiency at 60, 90 DAS and at maturity. Highest B: C ratio (2.5) was achieved under clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 which was at par with ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1. Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings and the lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) was recorded under RTW in weedy plot which was closely followed by weedy plots of ZTW. Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied. Energy intensity (3.0) was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1. The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (4688 kg ha-1) of wheat.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 4688 kg ha-1e1
- Setting
- Pantnagare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e1“The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) of wheat.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e1
- Outcome
- biological yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 12131 kg ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e1“The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 75.9% in wheat under RTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 75.9%e2
- Qualifier
- Graine2
- Setting
- RTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 30.8% in wheat under RTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 30.8%e2
- Qualifier
- biologicale2
- Setting
- RTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 22.3% in wheat under CTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 22.3%e2
- Qualifier
- Graine2
- Setting
- CTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 11.5% in wheat under CTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 11.5%e2
- Qualifier
- biologicale2
- Setting
- CTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 18.3% in wheat under ZTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 18.3%e2
- Qualifier
- Graine2
- Setting
- ZTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 14.3% in wheat under ZTW.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedse2
- Outcome
- yield losse2
- Value
- 14.3%e2
- Qualifier
- biologicale2
- Setting
- ZTWe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave 100% weed control efficiency at 60 and 90 DAS and at maturity in wheat.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 100%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e3“Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 in each establishment method of wheat recorded 100% weed control efficiency at 60, 90 DAS and at maturity”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest B:C ratio (2.5) in wheat, at par with the ready mix.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e4
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe4
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 2.5e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e4“Highest B: C ratio (2.5) was achieved under clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) in wheat was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- two hand weedingse5
- Outcome
- energy inpute5
- Direction
- Maximume5
- Value
- 15717 MJ ha-1e5
- Setting
- CTWe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e5“Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) in wheat was recorded under RTW in the weedy plot.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- weedy plote6
- Outcome
- energy inpute6
- Direction
- loweste6
- Value
- 15113 MJ ha-1e6
- Setting
- RTWe6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e6“the lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) was recorded under RTW in weedy plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
- Outcome
- Energy outpute7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- 171483 MJ ha-1e7
- Setting
- RTW plotse7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e7“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
- Outcome
- net energy returne7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- 156354 MJ ha-1e7
- Setting
- RTW plotse7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e7“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy use efficiency (11.3) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
- Outcome
- energy use efficiencye7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- 11.3e7
- Setting
- RTW plotse7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e7“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy intensity (3.0) of wheat was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e2
- Outcome
- Energy intensitye2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 3.0e2
- Setting
- RTWe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e2“Energy intensity (3.0) was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave the lowest bacterial population (6.87 log cfu) in wheat soil.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
- Outcome
- population of bacteriae3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 6.87 log cfue3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e3“The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave the lowest actinomycetes population (5.46 log cfu) in wheat soil.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum L.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
- Outcome
- actinomycetese3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 5.46 log cfue3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”
e3“The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.