Paper · 2023 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Weed-Control Measures on Yield, Weed Control, Economics, Energetics and Soil Microflora under Different Establishment Methods of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Sirazuddin; S. P. Singh; V. P. Singh; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods. The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1. Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 in each establishment method of wheat recorded 100% weed control efficiency at 60, 90 DAS and at maturity. Highest B: C ratio (2.5) was achieved under clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 which was at par with ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1. Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings and the lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) was recorded under RTW in weedy plot which was closely followed by weedy plots of ZTW. Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied. Energy intensity (3.0) was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1. The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (4688 kg ha-1) of wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste1
Value
4688 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Pantnagare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) of wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e1
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
12131 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest grain (4688 kg ha-1) and biological yield (12131 kg ha-1) was obtained in the plots treated with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 75.9% in wheat under RTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
75.9%e2
Qualifier
Graine2
Setting
RTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 30.8% in wheat under RTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
30.8%e2
Qualifier
biologicale2
Setting
RTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 22.3% in wheat under CTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
22.3%e2
Qualifier
Graine2
Setting
CTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 11.5% in wheat under CTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
11.5%e2
Qualifier
biologicale2
Setting
CTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a grain yield loss of 18.3% in wheat under ZTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
18.3%e2
Qualifier
Graine2
Setting
ZTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused a biological yield loss of 14.3% in wheat under ZTW.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedse2
Outcome
yield losse2
Value
14.3%e2
Qualifier
biologicale2
Setting
ZTWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain and biological yield loss under RTW, CTW and ZTW due to weeds was 75.9% and 30.8%, 22.3% and 11.5% and 18.3% and 14.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave 100% weed control efficiency at 60 and 90 DAS and at maturity in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
Outcome
weed control efficiencye3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
100%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e3

“Ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 in each establishment method of wheat recorded 100% weed control efficiency at 60, 90 DAS and at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1 gave the highest B:C ratio (2.5) in wheat, at par with the ready mix.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e4
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
2.5e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest B: C ratio (2.5) was achieved under clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) in wheat was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
two hand weedingse5
Outcome
energy inpute5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
15717 MJ ha-1e5
Setting
CTWe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum energy input (15717 MJ ha-1) was recorded under CTW with two hand weedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) in wheat was recorded under RTW in the weedy plot.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
weedy plote6
Outcome
energy inpute6
Direction
loweste6
Value
15113 MJ ha-1e6
Setting
RTWe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e6

“the lowest energy input (15113 MJ ha-1) was recorded under RTW in weedy plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
Outcome
Energy outpute7
Direction
maximume7
Value
171483 MJ ha-1e7
Setting
RTW plotse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e7

“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
Outcome
net energy returne7
Direction
maximume7
Value
156354 MJ ha-1e7
Setting
RTW plotse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e7

“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy use efficiency (11.3) of wheat was maximum in RTW plots with the ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1e7
Outcome
energy use efficiencye7
Direction
maximume7
Value
11.3e7
Setting
RTW plotse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e7

“Energy output (171483 MJ ha-1), net energy return (156354 MJ ha-1) and energy use efficiency (11.3) was maximum in case of RTW plots where ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 gha-1 was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy intensity (3.0) of wheat was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1e2
Outcome
Energy intensitye2
Direction
loweste2
Value
3.0e2
Setting
RTWe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e2

“Energy intensity (3.0) was lowest under RTW with clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave the lowest bacterial population (6.87 log cfu) in wheat soil.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
Outcome
population of bacteriae3
Direction
loweste3
Value
6.87 log cfue3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1 gave the lowest actinomycetes population (5.46 log cfu) in wheat soil.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1e3
Outcome
actinomycetese3
Direction
loweste3
Value
5.46 log cfue3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2013-2014 at Pantnagar, District, Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) to assess the effect of weed-control measures on grain yield, weed control efficiency (WCE), economics, energetic and soil microflora of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different establishment methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest population of bacteria (6.87 log cfu) and actinomycetes (5.46 log cfu) was recorded under ready mix of clodinafop-propargyl+MSM @ 64 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1564 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.