Paper · 2025 · African Crop Science Journal

Improving dual purpose value of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum in Mali using brown midrib and juicy traits

M. Doumbia; K. Théra; O. S. Diakité; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The increasing fodder demand in West African livestock production systems has prompted sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) breeding programmes to develop dual-purpose varieties that produce grain for human consumption and fodder for livestock. This study examines the possibility of improving sorghum stalks quality of a photoperiodic variety, using two genes, which are known to improve straw digestibility by livestock. Three near-isogenic lines carrying either the brown midrib (bmr-12) allele, the juiciness (d) allele, or both alleles, were developed from an elite photoperiodic dual-purpose variety. Trials with three sowing dates were conducted from 2020 to 2021. Phenology, morphology and stem chemical composition were measured. Lines carrying bmr-12 allele showed a greater reduction in stem lignin content, than those carrying the ‘d’ allele alone. The two alleles have no cumulative effect on lignin content or stalk digestibility. Delayed sowing improved stalk digestibility significantly, but it is not an appropriate agronomic solution as it drastically reduces crop growth. The utilisation of the brown midrib trait appears to be a promising method of enhancing stalk digestibility; while preserving the climate adaptation provided by photoperiodism. These results pave way for new dual-purpose sorghum varieties in sub-Saharan Africa, contributing to the intensification of peri-urban livestock production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bmr-12 allele reduced stem lignin more than the d allele alone.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
bmr-12 allelee0
Treatment
bmr-12 allelee0
Outcome
stem lignin contente0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
‘d’ allele alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lines carrying bmr-12 allele showed a greater reduction in stem lignin content, than those carrying the ‘d’ allele alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the two alleles had no cumulative effect on lignin content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
both allelese2
Outcome
lignin contente0
Direction
no cumulative effecte0
Comparator
either the brown midrib (bmr-12) allele, the juiciness (d) allelee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two alleles have no cumulative effect on lignin content or stalk digestibility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“carrying either the brown midrib (bmr-12) allele, the juiciness (d) allele, or both alleles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the two alleles had no cumulative effect on stalk digestibility.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
both allelese2
Outcome
stalk digestibilitye0
Direction
no cumulative effecte0
Comparator
either the brown midrib (bmr-12) allele, the juiciness (d) allelee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two alleles have no cumulative effect on lignin content or stalk digestibility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“carrying either the brown midrib (bmr-12) allele, the juiciness (d) allele, or both alleles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly improved stalk digestibility.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
stalk digestibilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing improved stalk digestibility significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing drastically reduced crop growth.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing improved stalk digestibility significantly, but it is not an appropriate agronomic solution as it drastically reduces crop growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend using the brown midrib trait to improve stalk digestibility while preserving photoperiod adaptation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
utilisation of the brown midrib traite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The utilisation of the brown midrib trait appears to be a promising method of enhancing stalk digestibility; while preserving the climate adaptation provided by photoperiodism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–124 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.