Paper · 1997 · jpa

Sorghum Hybrid Selection and Planting Management under Moisture Limiting Conditions

V. L. Martin; R. L. Vanderlip

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using the proper planting window and hybrid maturity for grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] under moisture‐limiting conditions would produce consistent yields of higher test weight grain. The main objective of the research was to determine the effect of planting date and hybrid maturity on sorghum grain yield. Study duration was 1993 through 1995 at the Sandyland Experiment Field, Stafford County, Kansas, on a Naron loamy fine sand (fine‐loamy, mixed, thermic Udic Argiustoll). Main plots were planting date (mid‐April through early July), subplots were hybrid maturities (early, medium, full), and sub‐subplots were individual hybrids. Planting prior to mid‐June did not separate bloom dates although planting dates were spread over 6 wk. The optimal planting period for consistent grain yield was 25 May through 5 June, regardless of maturity. Yields decreased with planting both earlier and later than this optimum, but early planting decreased yield less than late. Except at planting date extremes, hybrid maturity did not affect yield. Individual hybrid yield response within maturity groups interacted with planting date. Test weight was unaffected by early planting, but late planting was detrimental. An optimal planting window exists to produce consistent grain sorghum yields. Under conditions of moisture stress, individual hybrid characteristics, not maturity, are most important. Research Question Producers in areas of limited moisture plant grain sorghum during the later portion of the recommended planting period to permit mechanical weed control and move reproduction beyond heat and water stress. Full‐season hybrids are selected to optimize yield. These practices increase risk of low yield and quality. Early planting and use of early hybrids could improve yield consistency and quality. Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study. Literature Summary Planting date work has focused on no‐tillage, especially for corn. Unlike sorghum, corn plant development responds linearly to heat accumulation and increasing hybrid maturity increases hybrid yield under Corn Belt conditions. Unlike sorghum, corn maturity ratings use heat accumulation. Most sorghum is planted where corn production risk is high because of heat and moisture stress. Unlike corn, grain sorghum under stress delays reproduction. Because stress is typical in areas of sorghum production, full‐season hybrids are at greater risk with late planting. Limited work demonstrates the possibility of planting sorghum earlier. Data are needed across a number of planting dates and a range of maturities to determine the optimal planting period and hybrid maturity. Study Description Sorghum was planted following wheat from 1993 to 1995 at the Sandyland Experiment Field, Stafford County, Kansas, on a Naron loamy fine sand. Fertilization consisted of 20 lb P/acre and 143 lb N/acre. Metolachlor was used for grass control; broadleaf control was achieved with bromoxynil in 1993 and 1994, and atrazine plus dicamba in 1995. Treatments: Planting dates: five (mid‐April to early July). Split plots — hybrid maturity (early, medium, full). Subplots — individual hybrids (16 hybrids total). April–September moisture: 29.8 in.(1993); 12.3 in.(1994); 23.5 in.(1995); rainfall distribution varied markedly. Applied Questions Is there an optimal planting period and does hybrid maturity affect yield under moisture‐limiting conditions? During the study, across extremes in rainfall and temperature, consistent, optimal yields were achieved by planting from 25 May to 5 June regardless of maturity (Fig. ). Except at planting date extremes, hybrid maturity did not affect yield. The optimal planting window was widest with early hybrids and decreased as hybrid maturity increased. Abnormally wet, cool conditions shift the planting window into mid‐June, whereas dry, hot conditions favor mid‐May. Does planting early or late minimize risk to grain yield? Effect of planting date on grain sorghum yields in 1993, 1994, and 1995. LSD (0.05) = 10 (1993), 8 (1994), 6 (1995). image Planting early presents less risk, especially as hybrid maturity increases (Fig. ). Risks of early planting (cool, wet conditions; frost; seedling disease) are less in this region than those of late planting (dry, hot conditions; delayed maturity; freeze).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield decreased with planting both earlier and later than the optimum planting window.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
planting both earlier and later than this optimume3
Outcome
Yieldse3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
this optimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yields decreased with planting both earlier and later than this optimum, but early planting decreased yield less than late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting decreased yield less than late planting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
early plantinge3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
latee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yields decreased with planting both earlier and later than this optimum, but early planting decreased yield less than late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual hybrid yield response within maturity groups interacted with planting date.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
planting datee6
Outcome
Individual hybrid yield response within maturity groupse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e6

“Individual hybrid yield response within maturity groups interacted with planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight was unaffected by early planting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
early plantinge7
Outcome
Test weighte7
Direction
unaffectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e7

“Test weight was unaffected by early planting, but late planting was detrimental”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting was detrimental to test weight.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
late plantinge7
Outcome
Test weighte7
Direction
detrimentale7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e7

“Test weight was unaffected by early planting, but late planting was detrimental”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1222 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moisture stress, individual hybrid characteristics matter more than maturity for sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
individual hybrid characteristicse0
Qualifier
not maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under conditions of moisture stress, individual hybrid characteristics, not maturity, are most important”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting before mid-June did not separate sorghum bloom dates.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
Planting prior to mid‐Junee0
Outcome
bloom datese0
Direction
did not separatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e0

“Planting prior to mid‐June did not separate bloom dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting presents less risk to sorghum grain yield, especially as hybrid maturity increases.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
Planting earlye0
Outcome
riske0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
especially as hybrid maturity increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e0

“Planting early presents less risk, especially as hybrid maturity increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4130–4204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abnormally wet, cool conditions shift the sorghum planting window into mid-June, whereas dry, hot conditions favor mid-May.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
Abnormally wet, cool conditionse0
Outcome
planting windowe0
Direction
shifte0
Value
mid‐Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e0

“Abnormally wet, cool conditions shift the planting window into mid‐June, whereas dry, hot conditions favor mid‐May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3833–3947 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal sorghum planting window was widest with early hybrids and narrowed as hybrid maturity increased.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume5
Treatment
hybrid maturitye0
Outcome
optimal planting windowe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
widest with early hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Determining sorghum grain yield response to planting date and hybrid maturity was the objective of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1933 · show in text ↑
e0

“The optimal planting window was widest with early hybrids and decreased as hybrid maturity increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3731–3831 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.