Paper · 2015 · Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Sciences

EFFECT OF SPRAYING SOME NUTRIENTS AND CITRIC ACID ON FRUITING OF WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out during 2013 and 2014 seasons to test the effect of single and combined applications of NPK each at 0.1%, Zn Fe Mn each at 0.05% and citric acid at 0.1% on growth characters, tree nutritional status, yield and fruit quality of Washington Navel orange trees.Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acid was effective in enhancing all growth characters, leaf nutrient content, yield and fruit quality over the control treatment. Using macro and micro nutrients was superior than using citric acid in this respect. All nutrients and citric acid together was preferable than using each alone in this connection.Treating Washington Navel orange trees three times at growth start, just after fruit setting and at one month later with a mixture of NPK each at 0.1% , Zn Fe Un each at 0.05% and citric acid at 0.1% was responsible for promoting yield and fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined nutrient and citric acid applications enhanced growth characters over the control.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acide0
Outcome
growth characterse0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acid was effective in enhancing all growth characters, leaf nutrient content, yield and fruit quality over the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined nutrient and citric acid applications enhanced leaf nutrient content over the control.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acide0
Outcome
leaf nutrient contente0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acid was effective in enhancing all growth characters, leaf nutrient content, yield and fruit quality over the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined nutrient and citric acid applications enhanced yield over the control.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acide0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acid was effective in enhancing all growth characters, leaf nutrient content, yield and fruit quality over the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined nutrient and citric acid applications enhanced fruit quality over the control.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acide0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Single and combined application of different nutrients and citric acid was effective in enhancing all growth characters, leaf nutrient content, yield and fruit quality over the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macro and micro nutrients were superior to citric acid for the reported growth, nutrition, yield and quality outcomes.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
macro and micro nutrientse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
citric acide0

Verbatim

e0

“Using macro and micro nutrients was superior than using citric acid in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrients and citric acid were preferable to each alone for the reported outcomes.

Taxon
WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
All nutrients and citric acid togethere0
Outcome
preferablee0
Direction
preferablee0
Comparator
each alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“All nutrients and citric acid together was preferable than using each alone in this connection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three applications of the nutrient and citric acid mixture promoted yield and fruit quality in Washington Navel orange trees.

Taxon
Washington Navel orange treesCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
a mixture of NPK each at 0.1% , Zn Fe Un each at 0.05% and citric acid at 0.1%e0
Outcome
yield and fruit qualitye0
Direction
promotinge0
Qualifier
three times at growth start, just after fruit setting and at one month latere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treating Washington Navel orange trees three times at growth start, just after fruit setting and at one month later with a mixture of NPK each at 0.1% , Zn Fe Un each at 0.05% and citric acid at 0.1% was responsible for promoting yield and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–912 · show in text ↑

iron atom · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

citric acid · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

citric acid · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.