Paper · 2014 · Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Sciences

IMPACT OF SHOOTS CUTTING TIMES AND THE FERTILIZER EQUATION ON GROWTH, PRODUCTIVITY, AND CHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted to study the effect of two shoots cutting times, and four fertilizer equations on growth, yield and chemical components. These trials were carried out during the two successive growing seasons of 2009 and 2010 at Kaha Research Farm, Kaluobia Governorate Egypt. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberoses L) 'Fuseau' cultivar was used for studying the effect of different cutting times (at 60 and 90 days and control, i.e., without cutting) and four fertilizer equations (FE1) 200 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate (15.5%P2O5) was applied once before planting during soil preparation,+{250 kg/fed. of Ammonium sulphate (20.5%N) + 200 Kg/fed. of Potassium sulphate (48%k2O)} both were added as two equal doses after 30 and 60 days after planting (control treatment). Fertilizer equation (FE2) 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied once before planting during soil preparation,+{250 kg/fed. of Ammonium sulphate + 200 Kg /fed. of Potassium sulphate was added as two equal doses after every cutting times (60 and 90 days after planting) and the remaining of 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied at 120 days after planting. Fertilizer equation (FE3) 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied once before planting during soil preparation, + 30% of quantity from {250 kg/fed. of Ammonium sulphate + 200 Kg/fed. of Potassium sulphate was added at 30 days after planting, as for the 70% that retained it has been added after each cutting times (every 60 and 90 days after planting) and the remaining of 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied at 120 days after planting Fertilizer equation (FE4) 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied once before planting during soil preparation, + 50% of quantity from {250 kg/fed. of Ammonium sulphate (20.5%N) + 200 Kg /fed. of Potassium sulphate were added at 30 days after planting, as for the 50% that retained have been added after each cutting times (at 60 and 90 days after planting) and the remaining of 100 kg/fed. of Calcium super phosphate was applied at 120 days after planting. . A split plot design was used. Obtained results indicated that control plants produced the greatest vegetative growth, yield and its components and chemical constituents compared with other treatments. As regard to the effect of fertilizer equations, plants fertilized with equation 2 produced the maximum growth and yield and its components. On the other hand, the fertilizer equation 4 gave the highest values in total and reducing sugar content in tubers.Concerning the interaction between cutting times and fertilizer equations, data indicated that plants which cut at 60 days after planting with added fertilizer equation 2or 4 produced maximum values in yield and its components.It can be recommended that plants with cutting at 60 days after planting and applied the fertilizer equations 2 or 4 gave the highest values in the most parameters in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants (no cutting) produced the greatest vegetative growth, yield and its components and chemical constituents compared with the other treatments.

Taxon
JERUSALEM ARTICHOKEHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
control plantse0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and its components and chemical constituentse0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“control plants produced the greatest vegetative growth, yield and its components and chemical constituents compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants fertilized with fertilizer equation 2 produced the maximum growth and yield and its components.

Taxon
JERUSALEM ARTICHOKEHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
equation 2e0
Outcome
growth and yield and its componentse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants fertilized with equation 2 produced the maximum growth and yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer equation 4 gave the highest total and reducing sugar content in tubers.

Taxon
JERUSALEM ARTICHOKEHelianthus tuberosust0
Organ / stage
tuberse0
Treatment
fertilizer equation 4e0
Outcome
total and reducing sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“the fertilizer equation 4 gave the highest values in total and reducing sugar content in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants cut at 60 days after planting with fertilizer equation 2 or 4 produced maximum yield and yield components.

Taxon
JERUSALEM ARTICHOKEHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
cut at 60 days after planting with added fertilizer equation 2or 4e0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants which cut at 60 days after planting with added fertilizer equation 2or 4 produced maximum values in yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2668–2799 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 60 days after planting with fertilizer equation 2 or 4 is recommended to obtain the highest values in most parameters.

Taxon
JERUSALEM ARTICHOKEHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
cutting at 60 days after planting and applied the fertilizer equations 2 or 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“It can be recommended that plants with cutting at 60 days after planting and applied the fertilizer equations 2 or 4 gave the highest values in the most parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2800–2963 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.